From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt 5/5] igt/perf_pmu: Speed up frequency measurement
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:27:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa125c2d-e0bc-b62c-79c4-e3a46e5f4558@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222110323.21230-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 22/12/2017 11:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Use the normal batch_duration_ns and display the sampled frequency:
>
> Frequency: min=100, max=750, boost=750 MHz
> Min frequency: requested 100.0, actual 100.0
> Max frequency: requested 755.6, actual 755.6
>
> v2: Remove the early spin_batch_end and assert the measured frequencies
> are within tolerance of our target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index d88287c17..eb8791cd4 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -931,9 +931,10 @@ test_interrupts(int gem_fd)
> static void
> test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> {
> - const uint64_t duration_ns = 2e9;
> uint32_t min_freq, max_freq, boost_freq;
> - uint64_t min[2], max[2], start[2];
> + uint64_t val[2], start[2];
> + double min[2], max[2];
> + unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> int fd, sysfs;
>
> @@ -962,17 +963,18 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "gt_boost_freq_mhz", min_freq));
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_boost_freq_mhz") == min_freq);
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd); /* Idle to be sure the change takes effect */
> + spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, start);
>
> - spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, duration_ns);
> - gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>
> - pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, min);
> - min[0] -= start[0];
> - min[1] -= start[1];
> + pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val);
> + min[0] = 1e9*(val[0] - start[0]) / slept;
> + min[1] = 1e9*(val[1] - start[1]) / slept;
>
> igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd); /* Don't leak busy bo into the next phase */
>
> usleep(1e6);
>
> @@ -987,17 +989,18 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz", max_freq));
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz") == max_freq);
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
> + spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, start);
>
> - spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, duration_ns);
> - gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>
> - pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, max);
> - max[0] -= start[0];
> - max[1] -= start[1];
> + pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val);
> + max[0] = 1e9*(val[0] - start[0]) / slept;
> + max[1] = 1e9*(val[1] - start[1]) / slept;
>
> igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
>
> /*
> * Restore min/max.
> @@ -1008,8 +1011,12 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> min_freq, igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz"));
> close(fd);
>
> - igt_assert(min[0] < max[0]);
> - igt_assert(min[1] < max[1]);
> + igt_info("Min frequency: requested %.1f, actual %.1f\n",
> + min[0], min[1]);
> + igt_info("Max frequency: requested %.1f, actual %.1f\n",
> + max[0], max[1]);
> + assert_within_epsilon(min[0], min_freq, tolerance);
> + assert_within_epsilon(max[0], max_freq, tolerance);
> }
>
> static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 11:03 [PATCH igt 1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 2/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten measurements for most-busy Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 3/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 4/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for all-busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 5/5] igt/perf_pmu: Speed up frequency measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2017-12-22 12:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Patchwork
2017-12-22 13:18 ` [PATCH igt 1/5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 13:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/5] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa125c2d-e0bc-b62c-79c4-e3a46e5f4558@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox