From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:18:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <809592eb-0450-8d0d-cfbe-0b1e9a13af91@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156199186516.1583.17662429049479365764@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 01/07/2019 17:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-07-01 13:10:53)
>> On 01/07/2019 15:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-07-01 12:34:35)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>>>> index f92bace9caff..012d6d7f54e2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>>>> @@ -2104,6 +2104,14 @@ static int eb_oa_config(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>>> if (err)
>>>> return err;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * If the perf stream was opened with hold preemption, flag the
>>>> + * request properly so that the priority of the request is bumped once
>>>> + * it reaches the execlist ports.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (eb->i915->perf.oa.exclusive_stream->hold_preemption)
>>>> + eb->request->flags |= I915_REQUEST_FLAGS_PERF;
>>> Just to reassure myself that this is the behaviour you:
>>>
>>> If the exclusive_stream is changed before the request is executed, it is
>>> likely that we no longer notice the earlier preemption-protection. This
>>> should not matter because the listener is no longer interested in those
>>> events?
>>> -Chris
>>>
>> Yeah, dropping the perf stream before your queries complete and you're
>> in undefined behavior territory.
> Then this should do what you want, and if I break it in future, I have
> to fix it ;)
>
> Hmm, this definitely merits some selftest/igt as I am very liable to
> break it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris
>
I had an IGT test that used a spinning batch for a couple of seconds
(same trick as the noa wait patch) and verified that no other context
would come up in the OA buffer.
This might need allowing the preempt context or whatever is used for
hang checks.
-Lionel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-09 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-01 11:34 [PATCH v6 00/11] drm/i915: Vulkan performance query support Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] drm/i915/perf: add missing delay for OA muxes configuration Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] drm/i915/perf: introduce a versioning of the i915-perf uapi Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 12:45 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] drm/i915/perf: allow for CS OA configs to be created lazily Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 13:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 13:45 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 15:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-09 6:47 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-09 8:31 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-09 8:30 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] drm/i915: enumerate scratch fields Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 12:07 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] drm/i915/perf: implement active wait for noa configurations Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 12:43 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 13:10 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] drm/i915: introduce a mechanism to extend execbuf2 Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 15:17 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-02 11:36 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] drm/i915: add syncobj timeline support Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 13:13 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 13:15 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 13:18 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 13:22 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-03 8:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-03 9:17 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-15 11:30 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-07-16 8:17 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] drm/i915: add a new perf configuration execbuf parameter Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 12:05 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 12:14 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 12:03 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 12:10 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 14:37 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-09 9:18 ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915/perf: execute OA configuration from command stream Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 13:32 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-01 13:42 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] drm/i915: add support for perf configuration queries Lionel Landwerlin
2019-07-01 13:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Vulkan performance query support (rev6) Patchwork
2019-07-01 13:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-07-01 13:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-02 18:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=809592eb-0450-8d0d-cfbe-0b1e9a13af91@intel.com \
--to=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox