* [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
@ 2017-03-16 16:03 Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
4 billion times before retiring!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (!ce->state) {
ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e895c99f5dd9..758191e69403 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (ce->state) {
ret = context_pin(ctx);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-03-16 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
!ce->pin_count?
-Mika
> if (!ce->state) {
> ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index e895c99f5dd9..758191e69403 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (ce->state) {
> ret = context_pin(ctx);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Kuoppala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> > 4 billion times before retiring!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> >
> > if (ce->pin_count++)
> > return 0;
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
> >
>
> !ce->pin_count?
You might be right ;)
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 16:45 ` Patchwork
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-16 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21390/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 21390v1 drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21390/revisions/1/mbox/
Test core_auth:
Subgroup basic-auth:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test core_prop_blob:
Subgroup basic:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_getparams_basic:
Subgroup basic-eu-total:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-subslice-total:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_hangman:
Subgroup error-state-basic:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_module_reload:
Subgroup basic-no-display:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-reload:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650) fdo#100045
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-reload-final:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650) fdo#100045
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Test gem_basic:
Subgroup bad-close:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
WARNING: Long output truncated
fi-skl-6700k failed to connect after reboot
c1374a7a4a7fb0093d98ad6aa7071c8671fcdf08 drm-tip: 2017y-03m-16d-14h-28m-12s UTC integration manifest
716f41c drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4204/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2017-03-16 17:16 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
4 billion times before retiring!
v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 73386b7b22fa..aad107337530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (!ce->state) {
ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e895c99f5dd9..be908e2a52ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (ce->state) {
ret = context_pin(ctx);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-03-16 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 73386b7b22fa..aad107337530 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (!ce->state) {
> ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index e895c99f5dd9..be908e2a52ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (ce->state) {
> ret = context_pin(ctx);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Kuoppala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> > 4 billion times before retiring!
> >
> > v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Ta, applied because I like seeing CI churn (still reassuring myself that
the sporadic bug is now fixed).
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-03-17 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
On to, 2017-03-16 at 17:16 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
<SNIP>
> @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
An average engineer is able to tell this is about overflow, even
without the comment :P
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2)
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 17:59 ` Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-16 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21390/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 21390v2 drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21390/revisions/2/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time: 462s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time: 584s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time: 533s
fi-bxt-t5700 total:278 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time: 570s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time: 498s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:247 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 time: 494s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 432s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 429s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time: 443s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 517s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 490s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 475s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 483s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17 time: 592s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 477s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 510s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time: 551s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time: 409s
da5a30c70988b681c2a75b81d283bc66470a2216 drm-tip: 2017y-03m-16d-16h-30m-22s UTC integration manifest
304d2ce drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4207/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-17 7:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox