Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/vbt: Parse power conservation features block
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:29:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127225451.60023-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> wrote:
> From VBT 228+ this is block that PSR and other power saving
> features configuration should be read from.
>
> v3:
> Using DRRS from this new block
>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 36 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 29 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index f6a9a5ccb556..2d06f1f5734d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -659,16 +659,45 @@ parse_driver_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
> +	if (bdb->version < 228) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
> +		/*
> +		 * If DRRS is not supported, drrs_type has to be set to 0.
> +		 * This is because, VBT is configured in such a way that
> +		 * static DRRS is 0 and DRRS not supported is represented by
> +		 * driver->drrs_enabled=false
> +		 */
> +		if (!driver->drrs_enabled)
> +			dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +
> +		dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = driver->psr_enabled;
> +	}
> +}

Maybe this review comment gives you an idea what we have to think of and
deal with when working with VBT and VBT parsing.

Imagine VBT version >= 228 without lvds power block, and
driver->drrs_enabled == false.

> +
> +static void
> +parse_power_conservation_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				  const struct bdb_header *bdb)
> +{
> +	const struct bdb_lfp_power *power;
> +	u8 panel_type = dev_priv->vbt.panel_type;
> +
> +	if (bdb->version < 228)
> +		return;
> +
> +	power = find_section(bdb, BDB_LVDS_POWER);
> +	if (!power)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = power->psr & (1 << panel_type);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If DRRS is not supported, drrs_type has to be set to 0.
>  	 * This is because, VBT is configured in such a way that
>  	 * static DRRS is 0 and DRRS not supported is represented by
>  	 * driver->drrs_enabled=false
>  	 */
> -	if (!driver->drrs_enabled)
> +	if (!(power->drrs & (1 << panel_type)))
>  		dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> -	dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = driver->psr_enabled;
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -1973,6 +2002,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	parse_lfp_backlight(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_sdvo_panel_data(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_driver_features(dev_priv, bdb);
> +	parse_power_conservation_features(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_edp(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_psr(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_mipi_config(dev_priv, bdb);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> index f0338da3a82a..98b71dc32d2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> @@ -793,6 +793,35 @@ struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data {
>  	struct lfp_backlight_control_method backlight_control[16];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/*
> + * Block 44 - LFP Power Conservation Features Block
> + */
> +
> +struct als_data_entry {
> +	u16 backlight_adjust;
> +	u16 lux;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct agressiveness_profile_entry {
> +	u8 dpst_agressiveness : 4;
> +	u8 lace_agressiveness : 4;

Nitpick, none of the other bitfields have spaces around : here.

> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct bdb_lfp_power {

The idea is that the bdb struct name is the same as the block id enum,
just lower case. Please fix either.

BR,
Jani.


> +	u8 lfp_feature_bits;
> +	struct als_data_entry als[5];
> +	u8 lace_aggressiveness_profile;
> +	u16 dpst;
> +	u16 psr;
> +	u16 drrs;
> +	u16 lace_support;
> +	u16 adt;
> +	u16 dmrrs;
> +	u16 adb;
> +	u16 lace_enabled_status;
> +	struct agressiveness_profile_entry aggressivenes[16];
> +} __packed;
> +
>  /*
>   * Block 52 - MIPI Configuration Block
>   */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/vbt: Parse power conservation features block
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:29:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191128142956.G14DLjta70smxxYE2s5ssmvwzHXLt4NM5ZlR76uKLgI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127225451.60023-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> wrote:
> From VBT 228+ this is block that PSR and other power saving
> features configuration should be read from.
>
> v3:
> Using DRRS from this new block
>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 36 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 29 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index f6a9a5ccb556..2d06f1f5734d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -659,16 +659,45 @@ parse_driver_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
> +	if (bdb->version < 228) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS State Enabled:%d\n", driver->drrs_enabled);
> +		/*
> +		 * If DRRS is not supported, drrs_type has to be set to 0.
> +		 * This is because, VBT is configured in such a way that
> +		 * static DRRS is 0 and DRRS not supported is represented by
> +		 * driver->drrs_enabled=false
> +		 */
> +		if (!driver->drrs_enabled)
> +			dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +
> +		dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = driver->psr_enabled;
> +	}
> +}

Maybe this review comment gives you an idea what we have to think of and
deal with when working with VBT and VBT parsing.

Imagine VBT version >= 228 without lvds power block, and
driver->drrs_enabled == false.

> +
> +static void
> +parse_power_conservation_features(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				  const struct bdb_header *bdb)
> +{
> +	const struct bdb_lfp_power *power;
> +	u8 panel_type = dev_priv->vbt.panel_type;
> +
> +	if (bdb->version < 228)
> +		return;
> +
> +	power = find_section(bdb, BDB_LVDS_POWER);
> +	if (!power)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = power->psr & (1 << panel_type);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If DRRS is not supported, drrs_type has to be set to 0.
>  	 * This is because, VBT is configured in such a way that
>  	 * static DRRS is 0 and DRRS not supported is represented by
>  	 * driver->drrs_enabled=false
>  	 */
> -	if (!driver->drrs_enabled)
> +	if (!(power->drrs & (1 << panel_type)))
>  		dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type = DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> -	dev_priv->vbt.psr.enable = driver->psr_enabled;
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -1973,6 +2002,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	parse_lfp_backlight(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_sdvo_panel_data(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_driver_features(dev_priv, bdb);
> +	parse_power_conservation_features(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_edp(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_psr(dev_priv, bdb);
>  	parse_mipi_config(dev_priv, bdb);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> index f0338da3a82a..98b71dc32d2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
> @@ -793,6 +793,35 @@ struct bdb_lfp_backlight_data {
>  	struct lfp_backlight_control_method backlight_control[16];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/*
> + * Block 44 - LFP Power Conservation Features Block
> + */
> +
> +struct als_data_entry {
> +	u16 backlight_adjust;
> +	u16 lux;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct agressiveness_profile_entry {
> +	u8 dpst_agressiveness : 4;
> +	u8 lace_agressiveness : 4;

Nitpick, none of the other bitfields have spaces around : here.

> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct bdb_lfp_power {

The idea is that the bdb struct name is the same as the block id enum,
just lower case. Please fix either.

BR,
Jani.


> +	u8 lfp_feature_bits;
> +	struct als_data_entry als[5];
> +	u8 lace_aggressiveness_profile;
> +	u16 dpst;
> +	u16 psr;
> +	u16 drrs;
> +	u16 lace_support;
> +	u16 adt;
> +	u16 dmrrs;
> +	u16 adb;
> +	u16 lace_enabled_status;
> +	struct agressiveness_profile_entry aggressivenes[16];
> +} __packed;
> +
>  /*
>   * Block 52 - MIPI Configuration Block
>   */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26  0:53 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/psr: Refactor psr short pulse handler José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-28  0:38   ` Matt Roper
2019-11-28  0:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-26  0:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/psr: Enable ALPM lock timeout error interruption José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-28  1:01   ` Matt Roper
2019-11-28  1:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-26  0:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/psr: Check if sink PSR capability changed José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-28  1:21   ` Matt Roper
2019-11-28  1:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-28  1:30     ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-28  1:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-26  0:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915/vbt: Parse power conservation features block José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-26  0:54   ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-27 22:54   ` [PATCH v3 " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-27 22:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-28  0:38     ` Matt Roper
2019-11-28  0:38       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-28 14:29     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-11-28 14:29       ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-04  1:38       ` Souza, Jose
2019-12-05  7:59         ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-26  1:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation Patchwork
2019-11-26  1:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-26 10:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-26 10:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-26 22:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation (rev2) Patchwork
2019-11-26 22:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-27  9:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-27  9:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-27 21:58   ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-27 21:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-28  0:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation Matt Roper
2019-11-28  0:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-28  1:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation (rev3) Patchwork
2019-11-28  1:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-29  6:21 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-11-29  6:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox