Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2_NB_MBD subplatform
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:15:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k0kwv6t.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <784a071a-02c4-6a8a-0022-7f833841057b@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 16/06/2022 13:01, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>> DG2 NB SKU need to distinguish between MBD and AIC to probe
>> the VRAM Self Refresh feature support. Adding those sub platform
>> accordingly.
>> 
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  3 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 11 +++++++----
>>   include/drm/i915_pciids.h                | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>   4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index a5bc6a774c5a..f1f8699eedfd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1007,10 +1007,13 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>   #define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_PONTEVECCHIO)
>>   
>>   #define IS_DG2_G10(dev_priv) \
>> +	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD) || \
>>   	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10)
>>   #define IS_DG2_G11(dev_priv) \
>> +	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD) || \
>>   	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11)
>>   #define IS_DG2_G12(dev_priv) \
>> +	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD) || \
>>   	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)
>>   #define IS_ADLS_RPLS(dev_priv) \
>>   	IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index f0bf23726ed8..93da555adc4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,18 @@ static const u16 subplatform_rpl_ids[] = {
>>   	INTEL_RPLP_IDS(0),
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const u16 subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const u16 subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const u16 subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const u16 subplatform_g10_ids[] = {
>>   	INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(0),
>>   	INTEL_ATS_M150_IDS(0),
>> @@ -246,6 +258,15 @@ void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>   	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_rpl_ids,
>>   			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_rpl_ids))) {
>>   		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL);
>> +	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids,
>> +			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>> +		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD);
>> +	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids,
>> +			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>> +		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD);
>> +	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids,
>> +			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>> +		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD);
>>   	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids,
>>   			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids))) {
>>   		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> index 08341174ee0a..c929e2d7e59c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ enum intel_platform {
>>    * it is fine for the same bit to be used on multiple parent platforms.
>>    */
>>   
>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (3)
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (6)
>>   #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK (BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1)
>>   
>>   /* HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL */
>> @@ -111,9 +111,12 @@ enum intel_platform {
>>   #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_UY	(0)
>>   
>>   /* DG2 */
>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10	0
>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11	1
>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12	2
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD	0
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD	1
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD	2
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10	3
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11	4
>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12	5
>
> Ugh I feel this "breaks" the subplatform idea.. feels like it is just 
> too many bits when two separate sets of information get tracked (Gxx 
> plus MBD).

I think they could be specified independent of each other, though. The
subplatform if-else ladder would have to be replaced with independent
ifs. You'd have the G10/G11/G12 and 1 bit separately for MBD.

Only the macros for PCI IDs need to be separate (MBD vs not). You'll
then have:

static const u16 subplatform_g10_ids[] = {
	INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(0),
	INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
	INTEL_ATS_M150_IDS(0),
};

Ditto for g11 and g12, and separately:

static const u16 subplatform_mbd_ids[] = {
	INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
	INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
	INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
};

The IS_DG2_G10() etc. macros would remain unchanged. IS_DG2_MBD() would
only be IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MBD).

Main point is, a platform could belong to multiple independent
subplatforms.

Unless I'm missing something. ;)

> How about a separate "is_mbd" flag in runtime_info? You can split the 
> PCI IDs split as you have done, but do a search against the MBD ones and 
> set the flag.

What I dislike about this is that it's really not *runtime* info in any
sense, and it adds another way to define platform features. And we
already have too many.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>>   
>>   /* ADL */
>>   #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL	0
>> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>> index 4585fed4e41e..198be417bb2d 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>> @@ -693,32 +693,41 @@
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0xA7A9, info)
>>   
>>   /* DG2 */
>> -#define INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info) \
>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5690, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5691, info), \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5692, info), \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5692, info)
>> +
>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5693, info), \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5694, info), \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5695, info)
>> +
>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5696, info), \
>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5697, info)
>> +
>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info) \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A0, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A1, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A2, info)
>>   
>>   #define INTEL_DG2_G11_IDS(info) \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5693, info), \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5694, info), \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5695, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A5, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A6, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B0, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B1, info)
>>   
>>   #define INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(info) \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5696, info), \
>> -	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5697, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A3, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A4, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B2, info), \
>>   	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B3, info)
>>   
>>   #define INTEL_DG2_IDS(info) \
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>> +	INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>>   	INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info), \
>>   	INTEL_DG2_G11_IDS(info), \
>>   	INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(info)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-16 12:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] DG2 VRAM_SR Support Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/dgfx: OpRegion VRAM Self Refresh Support Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:56   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-17  9:46     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-06-16 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/dg1: OpRegion PCON DG1 MBD config support Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 13:00   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2_NB_MBD subplatform Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-16 14:15     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-06-16 14:38       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-06-16 14:47         ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-17  0:12   ` Matt Roper
2022-06-17  6:10     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915/dg2: DG2 MBD config Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/dgfx: Add has_lmem_sr Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/dgfx: Setup VRAM SR with D3COLD Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 12:46   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/rpm: Enable D3Cold VRAM SR Support Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 14:32   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-17  9:36     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Store lmem region in gt Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 14:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-17 13:45   ` Andi Shyti
2022-06-16 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/rpm: d3cold Policy Anshuman Gupta
2022-06-16 14:28   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-21  6:14     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-06-16 16:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for DG2 VRAM_SR Support (rev3) Patchwork
2022-06-16 17:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-06-16 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k0kwv6t.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox