Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/pcode: Extend pcode functions for multiple gt's
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:55:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k2guvm9.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e9c13234fe510235688e774d70326870eb7e219.1650435571.git.ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> wrote:
> Each gt contains an independent instance of pcode. Extend pcode functions
> to interface with pcode on different gt's. Previous (GT0) pcode read/write
> interfaces are preserved.

Replying here as well. I'd prefer it if a dependency on gt wasn't
introduced here. You could just pass the uncore.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h |  27 ++++++--
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c
> index ac727546868e..0cff212cc81b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  #include "i915_reg.h"
>  #include "intel_pcode.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
>  
>  static int gen6_check_mailbox_status(u32 mbox)
>  {
> @@ -52,14 +53,14 @@ static int gen7_check_mailbox_status(u32 mbox)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int __snb_pcode_rw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
> -			  u32 *val, u32 *val1,
> -			  int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms,
> -			  bool is_read)
> +static int __gt_pcode_rw(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox,
> +			 u32 *val, u32 *val1,
> +			 int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms,
> +			 bool is_read)
>  {
> -	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
> +	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>  
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->sb_lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * GEN6_PCODE_* are outside of the forcewake domain, we can use
> @@ -88,60 +89,60 @@ static int __snb_pcode_rw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
>  	if (is_read && val1)
>  		*val1 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, GEN6_PCODE_DATA1);
>  
> -	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) > 6)
> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) > 6)
>  		return gen7_check_mailbox_status(mbox);
>  	else
>  		return gen6_check_mailbox_status(mbox);
>  }
>  
> -int snb_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 *val, u32 *val1)
> +int intel_gt_pcode_read(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 *val, u32 *val1)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&i915->sb_lock);
> -	err = __snb_pcode_rw(i915, mbox, val, val1, 500, 20, true);
> -	mutex_unlock(&i915->sb_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
> +	err = __gt_pcode_rw(gt, mbox, val, val1, 500, 20, true);
> +	mutex_unlock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
>  
>  	if (err) {
> -		drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> -			"warning: pcode (read from mbox %x) mailbox access failed for %ps: %d\n",
> -			mbox, __builtin_return_address(0), err);
> +		drm_dbg(&gt->i915->drm,
> +			"gt %d: warning: pcode (read from mbox %x) mailbox access failed for %ps: %d\n",
> +			gt->info.id, mbox, __builtin_return_address(0), err);
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -int snb_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 val,
> -			    int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms)
> +int intel_gt_pcode_write_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 val,
> +				 int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&i915->sb_lock);
> -	err = __snb_pcode_rw(i915, mbox, &val, NULL,
> -			     fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms, false);
> -	mutex_unlock(&i915->sb_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
> +	err = __gt_pcode_rw(gt, mbox, &val, NULL,
> +			    fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms, false);
> +	mutex_unlock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
>  
>  	if (err) {
> -		drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> -			"warning: pcode (write of 0x%08x to mbox %x) mailbox access failed for %ps: %d\n",
> -			val, mbox, __builtin_return_address(0), err);
> +		drm_dbg(&gt->i915->drm,
> +			"gt %d: warning: pcode (write of 0x%08x to mbox %x) mailbox access failed for %ps: %d\n",
> +			gt->info.id, val, mbox, __builtin_return_address(0), err);
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static bool skl_pcode_try_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
> -				  u32 request, u32 reply_mask, u32 reply,
> -				  u32 *status)
> +static bool __gt_pcode_try_request(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox,
> +				   u32 request, u32 reply_mask, u32 reply,
> +				   u32 *status)
>  {
> -	*status = __snb_pcode_rw(i915, mbox, &request, NULL, 500, 0, true);
> +	*status = __gt_pcode_rw(gt, mbox, &request, NULL, 500, 0, true);
>  
>  	return (*status == 0) && ((request & reply_mask) == reply);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * skl_pcode_request - send PCODE request until acknowledgment
> - * @i915: device private
> + * intel_gt_pcode_request - send PCODE request until acknowledgment
> + * @gt: gt
>   * @mbox: PCODE mailbox ID the request is targeted for
>   * @request: request ID
>   * @reply_mask: mask used to check for request acknowledgment
> @@ -158,16 +159,16 @@ static bool skl_pcode_try_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
>   * Returns 0 on success, %-ETIMEDOUT in case of a timeout, <0 in case of some
>   * other error as reported by PCODE.
>   */
> -int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
> -		      u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms)
> +int intel_gt_pcode_request(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 request,
> +			   u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&i915->sb_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
>  
>  #define COND \
> -	skl_pcode_try_request(i915, mbox, request, reply_mask, reply, &status)
> +	__gt_pcode_try_request(gt, mbox, request, reply_mask, reply, &status)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Prime the PCODE by doing a request first. Normally it guarantees
> @@ -193,35 +194,48 @@ int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
>  	 * requests, and for any quirks of the PCODE firmware that delays
>  	 * the request completion.
>  	 */
> -	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> +	drm_dbg_kms(&gt->i915->drm,
>  		    "PCODE timeout, retrying with preemption disabled\n");
> -	drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, timeout_base_ms > 3);
> +	drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&gt->i915->drm, timeout_base_ms > 3);
>  	preempt_disable();
>  	ret = wait_for_atomic(COND, 50);
>  	preempt_enable();
>  
>  out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&i915->sb_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&gt->i915->sb_lock);
>  	return status ? status : ret;
>  #undef COND
>  }
>  
> +static int __gt_pcode_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	int ret = intel_gt_pcode_request(gt, DG1_PCODE_STATUS,
> +					 DG1_UNCORE_GET_INIT_STATUS,
> +					 DG1_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE,
> +					 DG1_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE, 180000);
> +
> +	drm_dbg(&gt->i915->drm, "gt %d: PCODE init status %d\n", gt->info.id, ret);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(&gt->i915->drm, "gt %d: Pcode did not report uncore initialization completion!\n",
> +			gt->info.id);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	struct intel_gt *gt;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (!IS_DGFX(i915))
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = skl_pcode_request(i915, DG1_PCODE_STATUS,
> -				DG1_UNCORE_GET_INIT_STATUS,
> -				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE,
> -				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE, 180000);
> -
> -	drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "PCODE init status %d\n", ret);
> -
> -	if (ret)
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Pcode did not report uncore initialization completion!\n");
> +	for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
> +		ret = __gt_pcode_init(gt);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h
> index 0962a17fac48..96c954ec91f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pcode.h
> @@ -8,16 +8,31 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> +struct intel_gt;
>  struct drm_i915_private;
>  
> -int snb_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 *val, u32 *val1);
> -int snb_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 val,
> -			    int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms);
> -#define snb_pcode_write(i915, mbox, val)			\
> +int intel_gt_pcode_read(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 *val, u32 *val1);
> +
> +int intel_gt_pcode_write_timeout(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 val,
> +				 int fast_timeout_us, int slow_timeout_ms);
> +
> +#define intel_gt_pcode_write(gt, mbox, val) \
> +	intel_gt_pcode_write_timeout(gt, mbox, val, 500, 0)
> +
> +int intel_gt_pcode_request(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 mbox, u32 request,
> +			   u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
> +
> +#define snb_pcode_read(i915, mbox, val, val1) \
> +	intel_gt_pcode_read(&(i915)->gt0, mbox, val, val1)
> +
> +#define snb_pcode_write_timeout(i915, mbox, val, fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms) \
> +	intel_gt_pcode_write_timeout(&(i915)->gt0, mbox, val, fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms)
> +
> +#define snb_pcode_write(i915, mbox, val) \
>  	snb_pcode_write_timeout(i915, mbox, val, 500, 0)
>  
> -int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
> -		      u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);
> +#define skl_pcode_request(i915, mbox, request, reply_mask, reply, timeout_base_ms) \
> +	intel_gt_pcode_request(&(i915)->gt0, mbox, request, reply_mask, reply, timeout_base_ms)
>  
>  int intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  6:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Introduce has_media_ratio_mode Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 18:44   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/gt: Add media freq factor to per-gt sysfs Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 18:43   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-26  0:28     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/pcode: Extend pcode functions for multiple gt's Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 19:08   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-29  1:21     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-26  7:55   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-04-26 20:05     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/gt: Convert callers to user per-gt pcode functions Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 21:54   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-29  1:21     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/pcode: Add a couple of pcode helpers Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 22:00   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-29  1:21     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/gt: Add media RP0/RPn to per-gt sysfs Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-24 22:05   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-29  1:21     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/gt: Fix memory leaks in " Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20 16:23   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-24 22:30   ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-26 20:21     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-27 11:45       ` Andi Shyti
2022-04-27 20:50         ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/gt: Expose per-gt RPS defaults in sysfs Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20  6:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/gt: Expose default value for media_freq_factor in per-gt sysfs Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20  7:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2022-04-20  7:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-20  7:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-29  0:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/9] drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-29  0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/pcode: Extend pcode functions for multiple gt's Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-29 12:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-04-29 14:46     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-04-13 18:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20  5:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] " Ashutosh Dixit
2022-04-20  5:21   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/pcode: Extend pcode functions for multiple gt's Ashutosh Dixit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k2guvm9.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox