From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Try to show where the pulse went
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:27:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e3kkzq5.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128102546.3857140-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> We have a case of a mysteriously absent pulse, so dump the engine
> details to see if we can find out what happened to it.
>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 8f6e353caa66..df3369c3f330 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -1479,6 +1479,8 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> drm_printf(m, "*** WEDGED ***\n");
>
> drm_printf(m, "\tAwake? %d\n", atomic_read(&engine->wakeref.count));
> + drm_printf(m, "\tBarriers?: %s\n",
> + yesno(!llist_empty(&engine->barrier_tasks)));
A random thought arise when reading this and it was that
should we do a memory barrier before dump. But there
would be no pairing and it could actually hide something
more sinister.
It is important to know if and where and why did we drop
our stethoscope.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> rq = READ_ONCE(engine->heartbeat.systole);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> index f665a0e23c61..0b1148cf3f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ static int __live_idle_pulse(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&engine->barrier_tasks));
>
> if (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(engine->gt, HZ / 5)) {
> + struct drm_printer m = drm_err_printer("pulse");
> +
> + pr_err("%s: no heartbeat pulse?\n", engine->name);
> + intel_engine_dump(engine, &m, "%s", engine->name);
> +
> err = -ETIME;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Try to show where the pulse went
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:27:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e3kkzq5.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191128112730.NMKFJ-qWUAoOusxpzo9TqxdbB2HGa7OId3WbAt2m8rM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128102546.3857140-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> We have a case of a mysteriously absent pulse, so dump the engine
> details to see if we can find out what happened to it.
>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 8f6e353caa66..df3369c3f330 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -1479,6 +1479,8 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> drm_printf(m, "*** WEDGED ***\n");
>
> drm_printf(m, "\tAwake? %d\n", atomic_read(&engine->wakeref.count));
> + drm_printf(m, "\tBarriers?: %s\n",
> + yesno(!llist_empty(&engine->barrier_tasks)));
A random thought arise when reading this and it was that
should we do a memory barrier before dump. But there
would be no pairing and it could actually hide something
more sinister.
It is important to know if and where and why did we drop
our stethoscope.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> rq = READ_ONCE(engine->heartbeat.systole);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> index f665a0e23c61..0b1148cf3f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ static int __live_idle_pulse(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&engine->barrier_tasks));
>
> if (intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(engine->gt, HZ / 5)) {
> + struct drm_printer m = drm_err_printer("pulse");
> +
> + pr_err("%s: no heartbeat pulse?\n", engine->name);
> + intel_engine_dump(engine, &m, "%s", engine->name);
> +
> err = -ETIME;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-28 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-28 10:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Try to show where the pulse went Chris Wilson
2019-11-28 10:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-28 11:27 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-11-28 11:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-28 11:31 ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-28 11:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-28 14:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2019-11-28 14:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877e3kkzq5.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox