Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Souza\, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>, "Gupta\,
	Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"zwisler@google.com" <zwisler@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2-resend] drm/i915/psr: Force PSR probe only after full initialization
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:40:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878skwz3ar.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66727024b95d96e33a7eef85b39304ab5b5e247e.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 09:41 +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>> On 2020-02-18 at 23:53:28 +0530, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
>> > Commit 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute
>> > phase
>> > once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
>> > causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
>> > moving to i915_driver_register() when everything is ready and
>> > driver
>> > is registering into the rest of the system.
>> > 
>> > Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
>> > atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking
>> > and
>> > it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
>> > Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable()
>> > or
>> > intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
>> > allow PSR to be enabled.
>> Is it possible to having a psr state in intel crtc state to do this,
>> this can be used in future when will have dual psr display?
>
> When we implement that we would probably move i915_psr to intel_crtc,
> just not sure how we would handle when the connector changes its CRTC
> but that is something to handle in the future.

Likely not intel_crtc, but rather intel_encoder or intel_dp I think.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> 
>> intel_psr_fastset_force() also forcing the fastset when psr mode
>> change from debugfs, may be intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(true)
>> can get rid of that.
>
> They are different, intel_psr_fastset_force() will do a atomic commit
> and change the PSR state while intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() will
> just make sure that the pipe attached to the eDP panel will have its
> state computed and checked in the next atomic commit.
>
>
>> > v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
>> > 
>> > Fixes: 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute
>> > phase once to enable PSR")
>> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
>> > Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
>> > Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
>> > Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h |  1 +
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c          |  3 +++
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  2 +-
>> >  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > index b4942b6445ae..35bafd281deb 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > @@ -936,6 +936,8 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp
>> > *intel_dp,
>> >  {
>> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> >  
>> > +	intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(intel_dp, false);
>> > +
>> >  	if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
>> >  		return;
>> >  
>> > @@ -1096,6 +1098,8 @@ void intel_psr_update(struct intel_dp
>> > *intel_dp,
>> >  	struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
>> >  	bool enable, psr2_enable;
>> >  
>> > +	intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(intel_dp, false);
>> > +
>> >  	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv) || READ_ONCE(psr->dp) != intel_dp)
>> >  		return;
>> >  
>> > @@ -1629,7 +1633,7 @@ void intel_psr_atomic_check(struct
>> > drm_connector *connector,
>> >  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> >  
>> >  	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv) || !new_state->crtc ||
>> > -	    dev_priv->psr.initially_probed)
>> > +	    !dev_priv->psr.force_mode_changed)
>> >  		return;
>> >  
>> >  	intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
>> > @@ -1640,5 +1644,15 @@ void intel_psr_atomic_check(struct
>> > drm_connector *connector,
>> >  	crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(new_state->state,
>> >  						   new_state->crtc);
>> >  	crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
>> > -	dev_priv->psr.initially_probed = true;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > bool set)
>> > +{
>> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> > +
>> > +	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv) || !intel_dp ||
>> > !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) ||
>> > +	    intel_dp != dev_priv->psr.dp)
>> > +		return;
>> > +
>> > +	dev_priv->psr.force_mode_changed = set;
>> >  }
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
>> > index c58a1d438808..27a70468e2b9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
>> > @@ -40,5 +40,6 @@ bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp
>> > *intel_dp);
>> >  void intel_psr_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> >  			    struct drm_connector_state *old_state,
>> >  			    struct drm_connector_state *new_state);
>> > +void intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> > bool set);
>> >  
>> >  #endif /* __INTEL_PSR_H__ */
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> > index f7a1c33697b7..83791c197611 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>> >  #include "display/intel_hotplug.h"
>> >  #include "display/intel_overlay.h"
>> >  #include "display/intel_pipe_crc.h"
>> > +#include "display/intel_psr.h"
>> >  #include "display/intel_sprite.h"
>> >  #include "display/intel_vga.h"
>> >  
>> > @@ -1256,6 +1257,8 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct
>> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> >  
>> >  	intel_audio_init(dev_priv);
>> >  
>> > +	intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set(dev_priv->psr.dp, true);
>> > +
>> >  	/*
>> >  	 * Some ports require correctly set-up hpd registers for
>> > detection to
>> >  	 * work properly (leading to ghost connected connector status),
>> > e.g. VGA
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > index 3330b538d379..a546655072bd 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
>> >  	bool dc3co_enabled;
>> >  	u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
>> >  	struct delayed_work dc3co_work;
>> > -	bool initially_probed;
>> > +	bool force_mode_changed;
>> >  };
>> >  
>> >  #define QUIRK_LVDS_SSC_DISABLE (1<<1)
>> > -- 
>> > 2.25.1
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-21  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-18 18:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2-resend] drm/i915/psr: Force PSR probe only after full initialization José Roberto de Souza
2020-02-20  4:11 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-02-20 21:02   ` Souza, Jose
2020-02-21  9:40     ` Jani Nikula [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878skwz3ar.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=zwisler@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox