Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Move the DPLL extra power domain handling up one level
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:56:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyxj28jp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012123522.26045-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The extra DPLL power domain is currently handled in three places:
> - combo_pll_enable()
> - combo_pll_disable()
> - readout_dpll_hw_state()
>
> First two of those are low level PLL funcs, but the third is a higher
> level thing. So the current situation is rather inconsistent. Unify
> this by moving the PLL enable/disable up one level. This also means
> the extra power domain could be trivially be used by other platforms
> as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 4e524cb8ed83..556b10eefe66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,10 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, pll->on);
>  
>  	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "enabling %s\n", pll->info->name);
> +
> +	if (pll->info->power_domain)
> +		pll->wakeref = intel_display_power_get(i915, pll->info->power_domain);
> +
>  	pll->info->funcs->enable(i915, pll);
>  	pll->on = true;
>  
> @@ -307,6 +311,9 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	pll->info->funcs->disable(i915, pll);
>  	pll->on = false;
>  
> +	if (pll->info->power_domain)
> +		intel_display_power_put(i915, pll->info->power_domain, pll->wakeref);
> +
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&i915->display.dpll.lock);
>  }
> @@ -3838,9 +3845,6 @@ static void combo_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  {
>  	i915_reg_t enable_reg = intel_combo_pll_enable_reg(i915, pll);
>  
> -	if (pll->info->power_domain)
> -		pll->wakeref = intel_display_power_get(i915, pll->info->power_domain);
> -
>  	icl_pll_power_enable(i915, pll, enable_reg);
>  
>  	icl_dpll_write(i915, pll);
> @@ -3936,9 +3940,6 @@ static void combo_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	i915_reg_t enable_reg = intel_combo_pll_enable_reg(i915, pll);
>  
>  	icl_pll_disable(i915, pll, enable_reg);
> -
> -	if (pll->info->power_domain)
> -		intel_display_power_put(i915, pll->info->power_domain, pll->wakeref);
>  }
>  
>  static void tbt_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> @@ -4409,6 +4410,9 @@ static void sanitize_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  
>  	pll->info->funcs->disable(i915, pll);
>  	pll->on = false;
> +
> +	if (pll->info->power_domain)
> +		intel_display_power_put(i915, pll->info->power_domain, pll->wakeref);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12 12:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: DPLL code cleanups Ville Syrjala
2023-10-12 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Use named initializers for DPLL info Ville Syrjala
2023-10-12 14:52   ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-12 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Abstract the extra JSL/EHL DPLL4 power domain better Ville Syrjala
2023-10-12 14:56   ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-12 16:20     ` Imre Deak
2023-10-12 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Move the DPLL extra power domain handling up one level Ville Syrjala
2023-10-12 14:56   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-12 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Extract _intel_{enable, disable}_shared_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2023-10-12 14:57   ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-12 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: DPLL code cleanups Patchwork
2023-10-12 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-13 22:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: DPLL code cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-13 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-10-17 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: DPLL code cleanups (rev4) Patchwork
2023-10-17 16:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-27 22:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: DPLL code cleanups (rev5) Patchwork
2023-10-27 22:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-10-30  7:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cyxj28jp.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox