From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/: Refactor hsw_crtc_enable for bigjoiner cleanup
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:48:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee32pcce.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315233856.30255-1-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch abstracts pieces of hsw_crtc_enable corresponding to different
> Bspec enable sequence steps into separate functions.
> This helps to call them in a specific order for bigjoiner master/slave
> in a cleaner fashion.
So does this contain only refactoring or functional changes also? One or
the other at a time, please, not both.
Also looks like hsw_crtc_* have accumulated just way too many checks for
platforms instead of having a clean break at e.g. display 9 and/or 11.
Adding references to "enable sequence step 8" is not helpful because
it's platform specific. (Yeah, I know there are existing references like
this, but they're also suspect.)
BR,
Jani.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 125 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index eb49973621f0..d8e6466c9fa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1865,24 +1865,6 @@ static void hsw_set_frame_start_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, val);
> }
>
> -static void icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> - struct intel_crtc *master_crtc = intel_master_crtc(crtc_state);
> -
> - /*
> - * Enable sequence steps 1-7 on bigjoiner master
> - */
> - if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> - intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, master_crtc);
> -
> - if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> - intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
> -
> - if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> - intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, master_crtc);
> -}
> -
> static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -1910,70 +1892,73 @@ static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
> hsw_set_transconf(crtc_state);
> }
>
> -static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> - intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> - enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> - enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> - bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> -
> - if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> - return;
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>
> - if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> - intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> + /*
> + * Enable sequence steps 1 - 7 on all pipes
> + */
> + intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> + if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> + intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
>
> - if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> - intel_enable_shared_dpll(new_crtc_state);
> + intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> +}
>
> - intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> - } else {
> - icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> - }
> +static void hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> + bool psl_clkgate_wa;
>
> - intel_dsc_enable(new_crtc_state);
> + /*
> + * Enable sequence step 8
> + */
> + intel_dsc_enable(crtc_state);
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> - intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(new_crtc_state);
> + intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(crtc_state);
>
> - intel_set_pipe_src_size(new_crtc_state);
> + intel_set_pipe_src_size(crtc_state);
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> - bdw_set_pipemisc(new_crtc_state);
> + bdw_set_pipemisc(crtc_state);
>
> - if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state) &&
> + if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state) &&
> !transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder))
> - hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(new_crtc_state);
> + hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(crtc_state);
>
> crtc->active = true;
>
> /* Display WA #1180: WaDisableScalarClockGating: glk */
> psl_clkgate_wa = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10 &&
> - new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> if (psl_clkgate_wa)
> glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, true);
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> - skl_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> + skl_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
> else
> - ilk_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> + ilk_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
>
> /*
> * On ILK+ LUT must be loaded before the pipe is running but with
> * clocks enabled
> */
> - intel_color_load_luts(new_crtc_state);
> - intel_color_commit(new_crtc_state);
> + intel_color_load_luts(crtc_state);
> + intel_color_commit(crtc_state);
> /* update DSPCNTR to configure gamma/csc for pipe bottom color */
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> - intel_disable_primary_plane(new_crtc_state);
> + intel_disable_primary_plane(crtc_state);
>
> - hsw_set_linetime_wm(new_crtc_state);
> + hsw_set_linetime_wm(crtc_state);
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> - icl_set_pipe_chicken(new_crtc_state);
> + icl_set_pipe_chicken(crtc_state);
>
> intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
>
> @@ -1984,8 +1969,8 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> icl_pipe_mbus_enable(crtc, dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
> }
>
> - if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
> - intel_crtc_vblank_on(new_crtc_state);
> + if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> + intel_crtc_vblank_on(crtc_state);
>
> intel_encoders_enable(state, crtc);
>
> @@ -1996,7 +1981,7 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> /* If we change the relative order between pipe/planes enabling, we need
> * to change the workaround. */
> - hsw_workaround_pipe = new_crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> + hsw_workaround_pipe = crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && hsw_workaround_pipe != INVALID_PIPE) {
> struct intel_crtc *wa_crtc;
>
> @@ -2007,6 +1992,29 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> +static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> + struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> + return;
> +
> + hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, slave_crtc,
> + intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(new_crtc_state)) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, slave_crtc);
> +
> + hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, slave_crtc_state);
> + }
> + hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> +}
> +
> void ilk_pfit_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(old_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -8122,11 +8130,11 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> intel_crtc_update_active_timings(new_crtc_state);
>
> - dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> -
> if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
> return;
>
> + dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> +
> intel_drrs_enable(new_crtc_state);
>
> /* vblanks work again, re-enable pipe CRC. */
> @@ -8360,8 +8368,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> continue;
>
> if (intel_dp_mst_is_slave_trans(new_crtc_state) ||
> - is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state) ||
> - intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(new_crtc_state))
> + is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state))
> continue;
>
> modeset_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> @@ -8371,7 +8378,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>
> /*
> * Then we enable all remaining pipes that depend on other
> - * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters, big joiner master
> + * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters
> */
> for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 23:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/: Refactor hsw_crtc_enable for bigjoiner cleanup Manasi Navare
2022-03-16 0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-03-16 3:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-16 7:48 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-16 17:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 15:35 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 18:28 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 18:31 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 19:15 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-17 19:05 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 19:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30 0:00 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-30 9:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee32pcce.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox