Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix header test with GCOV
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:29:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeuktbg8.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f6712cd-87e5-5480-f01c-bfadd98368b5@infradead.org>

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> On 2/21/20 9:49 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:25 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/21/20 8:53 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:43 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jani,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 7:54 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $(CC) with $(CFLAGS_GCOV) assumes the output filename with .gcno suffix
>>>>>> appended is writable. This is not the case when the output filename is
>>>>>> /dev/null:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   HDRTEST drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h
>>>>>> /dev/null:1:0: error: cannot open /dev/null.gcno
>>>>>>   HDRTEST drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
>>>>>> /dev/null:1:0: error: cannot open /dev/null.gcno
>>>>>> make[5]: *** [../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile:307:
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.hdrtest] Error 1
>>>>>> make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>>> make[5]: *** [../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile:307:
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.hdrtest] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Filter out $(CFLAGS_GVOC) from the header test $(c_flags) as they don't
>>>>>> make sense here anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is GCOV the only case that produces a separate file?
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you also test CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT, please ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The GCC manual says this:
>>>>>
>>>>> -gsplit-dwarf
>>>>>
>>>>>    Separate as much DWARF debugging information as possible into a
>>>>> separate output
>>>>>    file with the extension .dwo. This option allows the build system
>>>>> to avoid linking
>>>>>    files with debug information. To be useful, this option requires a debugger
>>>>>    capable of reading .dwo files.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just tested it.
>>>>
>>>> This is not a problem for header test
>>>> because cmd_hdrtest uses '-S' instead of '-c'.
>>>>
>>>> If '-c' were used, we would see a similar error.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, gsplit-dwarf is OK.
>>>
>>> Yes, works for me also.
>>>
>>> (I think you have a faster build machine that I do. I began the build
>>> almost immediately after reading your email. :)
>> 
>> 
>> I use a reasonable PC for my development.
>> (core-i9 with 4 physical cores)
>> 
>> 
>> I just compiled under i915/ with this command:
>> 
>> make drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
>
> Good trick.  I did a full build.

Thanks for the testing.

I also checked with some other options, did not see any failures. I'll
go with this for now, let's revisit as needed.

Another related thing is we try to hide this a bit from build testing
outside of our CI with "depends on !COMPILE_TEST" but I guess there's no
way to ensure something is not enabled on a randconfig build...

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-21 10:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix header test with GCOV Jani Nikula
2020-02-21 15:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-02-24 12:22   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-21 18:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-02-21 18:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-22  4:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-22  4:53   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-22  5:25     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-02-22  5:49       ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-22  5:53         ` Randy Dunlap
2020-02-24 12:29           ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-02-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eeuktbg8.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox