From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt in intel_bios.c
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:20:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsza50zq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428061808.2848432-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> Instead of poluting the normal code path in intel_display.c, make
> intel_bios.c handle the brokenness of the VBT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 ++------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index befab891a6b9..e9f828452412 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1852,6 +1852,14 @@ intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
> devdata->child.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_INTERNAL_CONNECTOR;
> }
>
> +static bool skip_broken_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
The idea of the patch seems good to me, but I'll nitpick on the naming.
I suggest calling this positively is_port_valid() or something like
that.
With that,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> +{
> + if (port == PORT_F && (IS_ICELAKE(i915) || IS_CANNONLAKE(i915)))
> + return !IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(i915) && !IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(i915);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
> {
> @@ -1865,6 +1873,13 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> if (port == PORT_NONE)
> return;
>
> + if (skip_broken_vbt(i915, port)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> + "VBT reports port %c as supported, but that can't be true: skipping\n",
> + port_name(port));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> info = &i915->vbt.ddi_port_info[port];
>
> if (info->devdata) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 55f8f2ceada2..87a85de5e03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10868,15 +10868,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> -
> - /*
> - * On some ICL SKUs port F is not present, but broken VBTs mark
> - * the port as present. Only try to initialize port F for the
> - * SKUs that may actually have it.
> - */
> - if (IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> -
> + intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> } else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> @@ -10889,9 +10881,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> -
> - if (IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> + intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> u32 found;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 23:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] Simplify intel_setup_outputs Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init() Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/display: remove FIXME comment for intended feature Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9 Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28 7:12 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt in intel_bios.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28 6:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28 7:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-04-28 7:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] " Jani Nikula
2021-04-28 16:16 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28 0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev2) Patchwork
2021-04-28 3:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev3) Patchwork
2021-04-28 7:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev4) Patchwork
2021-04-28 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fsza50zq.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox