Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:12:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im4651cq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427230756.2847495-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> Direction on gen9+ was to stop reading the straps and only rely on the
> VBT for marking the port presence. This happened while dealing with
> WaIgnoreDDIAStrap and instead of using it as a WA, it should now be the
> normal flow. See commit 885d3e5b6f08 ("drm/i915/display: fix comment on
> skl straps").
>
> For gen 10 it's hard to say if this will work or not since I can't test
> it, so leave it with the same behavior as before.
>
> For PCH_TGP we should still rely on the VBT to make ports E and F not
> available.
>
> v2 (Ville):
>   - use display ver >= 9 to make it consistent with the rest of the
>     driver instead of checking for == 9
>   - also handle CNL and only initialize port F if it is
>     IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F. Eventually CNL may be removed, but while it
>     isn't let's keep it consistent everywhere

I agree with this.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 38 +++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 37fe35f6de2c..55f8f2ceada2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10883,34 +10883,27 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
>  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
>  		vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> +	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> +
> +		if (IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
> +			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>  	} else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> -		int found;
> +		u32 found;
>  
>  		if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
>  			intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs.
> -		 * On SKL pre-D0 the strap isn't connected. Later SKUs may or
> -		 * may not have it - it was supposed to be fixed by the same
> -		 * time we stopped using straps. Assume it's there.
> -		 */
> +		/* Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs. */
>  		found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
> -		/* WaIgnoreDDIAStrap: skl */
> -		if (found || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
> +		if (found)
>  			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
>  
> -		/* DDI B, C, D, and F detection is indicated by the SFUSE_STRAP
> -		 * register */
> -		if (HAS_PCH_TGP(dev_priv)) {
> -			/* W/A due to lack of STRAP config on TGP PCH*/
> -			found = (SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED |
> -				 SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED |
> -				 SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED);
> -		} else {
> -			found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
> -		}
> -
> +		found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
>  		if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
>  			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
>  		if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
> @@ -10919,11 +10912,6 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
>  		if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED)
>  			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> -		/*
> -		 * On SKL we don't have a way to detect DDI-E so we rely on VBT.
> -		 */
> -		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
> -			intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>  	} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
>  		int found;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27 23:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] Simplify intel_setup_outputs Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init() Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/display: remove FIXME comment for intended feature Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9 Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28  7:12   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-04-27 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt in intel_bios.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28  6:18   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28  7:20     ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-28  7:02   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] " Jani Nikula
2021-04-28 16:16     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-28  0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev2) Patchwork
2021-04-28  3:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev3) Patchwork
2021-04-28  7:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Simplify intel_setup_outputs (rev4) Patchwork
2021-04-28  9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87im4651cq.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox