From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 20:38:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilkzsd4f.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915004601.320198-1-pceballos@google.com>
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com> wrote:
> On some devices the Parade PS175 takes more than 400ms to settle in PCON
> mode.
Got any bug report with more info, or any other details to back this up?
This is kind of thin. What's the 800 ms based on?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> index 15d59de8810e..b4cbade13ee5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_wait_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Waiting for LSPCON mode %s to settle\n",
> lspcon_mode_name(mode));
>
> - wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 400);
> + wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 800);
> if (current_mode != mode)
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "LSPCON mode hasn't settled\n");
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-04 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 0:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout Pablo Ceballos
2022-09-19 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-09-19 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-09-19 20:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-10-04 17:38 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-10-06 22:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Pablo Ceballos
2022-10-13 7:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-13 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilkzsd4f.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=pceballos@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox