From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init()
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:38:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0q374qc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210213190511.1017088-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> On intel_ddi_init() we already check VBT if the port supports HDMI/DP
> and bail out otherwise. Instad of checking if a single port is present
> using VBT in intel_display.c, move the stronger check to
> intel_ddi_init() and return early in case it's not supported. There
> would be no way intel_bios_* would report support for hdmi/dp if the
> port isn't present so this should cause no regressions for other
> platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 3b97c0091812..1235be0ba5d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3972,6 +3972,13 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> bool init_hdmi, init_dp;
> enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port);
>
> + if (!intel_bios_is_port_present(dev_priv, port)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "VBT says port %c is not present, respect it\n",
> + port_name(port));
> + return;
> + }
> +
We now have this:
devdata = intel_bios_encoder_data_lookup(dev_priv, port);
if (!devdata) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"VBT says port %c is not present\n",
port_name(port));
return;
}
added in 45c0673aac97 ("drm/i915/bios: start using the
intel_bios_encoder_data directly").
With that, the below hunks are
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> /*
> * On platforms with HTI (aka HDPORT), if it's enabled at boot it may
> * have taken over some of the PHYs and made them unavailable to the
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 23ec68498800..7aaf7a29d493 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -11904,13 +11904,13 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> +
> /*
> - * On some ICL SKUs port F is not present. No strap bits for
> - * this, so rely on VBT.
> - * Work around broken VBTs on SKUs known to have no port F.
> + * On some ICL SKUs port F is not present, but broken VBTs mark
> + * the port as present. Only try to initialize port F for the
> + * SKUs that may actually have it.
> */
> - if (IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv) &&
> - intel_bios_is_port_present(dev_priv, PORT_F))
> + if (IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>
> icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> @@ -11964,10 +11964,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> /*
> * On SKL we don't have a way to detect DDI-E so we rely on VBT.
> */
> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) &&
> - intel_bios_is_port_present(dev_priv, PORT_E))
> + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> -
> } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
> int found;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-19 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-13 19:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Simplify intel_setup_outputs() Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-13 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init() Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-15 10:35 ` Jani Nikula
2021-02-15 16:26 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-16 19:50 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-18 19:41 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-03-19 11:38 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-02-13 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/display: remove FIXME comment for intended feature Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-13 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9 Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-13 19:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Simplify intel_setup_outputs() Patchwork
2021-02-13 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-13 6:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Simplify intel_setup_outputs Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-13 6:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init() Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0q374qc.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox