Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/bios: rename bios to oprom when mapping pci rom
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:01:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k18a660l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108003602.33526-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> oprom is actually a better name to use when using
> pci_map_rom(). "bios"  is way too generic and confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index a03f56b7b4ef..1f83616cfc32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return vbt;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *bios, size_t size)
> +static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  {
>  	size_t i;
>  
> @@ -1812,14 +1812,14 @@ static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *bios, size_t size)
>  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
>  		void *vbt;
>  
> -		if (ioread32(bios + i) != *((const u32 *) "$VBT"))
> +		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)"$VBT"))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * This is the one place where we explicitly discard the address
>  		 * space (__iomem) of the BIOS/VBT.
>  		 */
> -		vbt = (void __force *) bios + i;
> +		vbt = (void __force *)oprom + i;
>  		if (intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(vbt, size - i))
>  			return vbt;
>  
> @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>  	const struct vbt_header *vbt = dev_priv->opregion.vbt;
>  	const struct bdb_header *bdb;
> -	u8 __iomem *bios = NULL;
> +	u8 __iomem *oprom = NULL;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv) || !INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv)) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Skipping VBT init due to disabled display.\n");
> @@ -1855,11 +1855,11 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	if (!vbt) {
>  		size_t size;
>  
> -		bios = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> -		if (!bios)
> +		oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> +		if (!oprom)
>  			goto out;
>  
> -		vbt = find_vbt(bios, size);
> +		vbt = find_vbt(oprom, size);
>  		if (!vbt)
>  			goto out;
>  
> @@ -1893,8 +1893,8 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		init_vbt_missing_defaults(dev_priv);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (bios)
> -		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, bios);
> +	if (oprom)
> +		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/bios: rename bios to oprom when mapping pci rom
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:01:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k18a660l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191108100146.NVvpYoSjp7sFi8Nh96UVSizdgHAq_B9zx4m9LkLmQMc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108003602.33526-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> oprom is actually a better name to use when using
> pci_map_rom(). "bios"  is way too generic and confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index a03f56b7b4ef..1f83616cfc32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return vbt;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *bios, size_t size)
> +static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  {
>  	size_t i;
>  
> @@ -1812,14 +1812,14 @@ static const struct vbt_header *find_vbt(void __iomem *bios, size_t size)
>  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
>  		void *vbt;
>  
> -		if (ioread32(bios + i) != *((const u32 *) "$VBT"))
> +		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)"$VBT"))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * This is the one place where we explicitly discard the address
>  		 * space (__iomem) of the BIOS/VBT.
>  		 */
> -		vbt = (void __force *) bios + i;
> +		vbt = (void __force *)oprom + i;
>  		if (intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(vbt, size - i))
>  			return vbt;
>  
> @@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>  	const struct vbt_header *vbt = dev_priv->opregion.vbt;
>  	const struct bdb_header *bdb;
> -	u8 __iomem *bios = NULL;
> +	u8 __iomem *oprom = NULL;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv) || !INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv)) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Skipping VBT init due to disabled display.\n");
> @@ -1855,11 +1855,11 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	if (!vbt) {
>  		size_t size;
>  
> -		bios = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> -		if (!bios)
> +		oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> +		if (!oprom)
>  			goto out;
>  
> -		vbt = find_vbt(bios, size);
> +		vbt = find_vbt(oprom, size);
>  		if (!vbt)
>  			goto out;
>  
> @@ -1893,8 +1893,8 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		init_vbt_missing_defaults(dev_priv);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (bios)
> -		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, bios);
> +	if (oprom)
> +		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-08  0:35 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/opregion: fix leaking fw on error path Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/bios: rename bios to oprom when mapping pci rom Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 10:01   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-11-08 10:01     ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-08  0:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/bios: make sure to check vbt size Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 10:08   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-08 10:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-08 17:41     ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 17:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/bios: do not discard address space Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08  0:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 11:14   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-08 11:14     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-08 18:18     ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 18:18       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 19:19       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-08 19:19         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-08 20:14         ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 20:14           ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 21:02           ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-08 21:02             ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-08 21:09             ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 21:09               ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-11 11:10       ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-11 11:10         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-10 16:57   ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-10 16:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-10 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/bios: find_vbt() can be static kbuild test robot
2019-11-10 16:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-08  1:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/opregion: fix leaking fw on error path Patchwork
2019-11-08  1:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-08  2:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-08  2:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-08  9:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-08  9:16   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-08 17:34   ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-08 17:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-09 13:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
2019-11-09 13:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k18a660l.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox