Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: mika.kahola@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for vblank after register read
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:22:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgdie17i.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524206549.16539.24.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 17:09 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> > When reading out CRC's we  wait for a vblank on
>> > intel_dp_sink_crc_start()
>> > function. When we start reading out CRC's in intel_dp_sink_crc()
>> > loop we
>> > first wait for a vblank yielding that all in all we end up waiting
>> > two
>> > vblanks on the first iteration round. Therefore, let's move the
>> > intel_wait_for_vblank() as the last routine that we do in an
>> > iteration loop
>> > in intel_dp_sink_crc().
>> > 
>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
>> Umm, do the CI failures in the bug really use sink crc, or are they
>> rather about pipe crc?
>> 
> The bug is more on pipe crc. This just caught my attention while I was
> looking into these bugs. 

I think the practice we've adopted is,

Bugzilla: <bug that this patch should fix>

References: <bug or something else that this patch is related to>

> Was there a reason why we need to wait two vblanks here before running
> the loop?

I can't remember by heart. I'm not sure if it would make more sense to
remove the vblank wait from intel_dp_sink_crc_start() instead. Even with
your patch, there'll still be an extra vblank wait, you just move it to
a different place.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> 
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 +++--
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > index 62f82c4..6eb97fa 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> > @@ -3972,13 +3972,14 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp
>> > *intel_dp, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_s
>> >  		return ret;
>> >  
>> >  	do {
>> > -		intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, intel_crtc->pipe);
>> > -
>> >  		if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
>> >  				      DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf) <
>> > 0) {
>> >  			ret = -EIO;
>> >  			goto stop;
>> >  		}
>> > +
>> > +		intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, intel_crtc->pipe);
>> > +
>> >  		count = buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK;
>> >  
>> >  	} while (--attempts && count == 0);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-18  7:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for vblank after register read Mika Kahola
2018-04-18 14:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-04-18 18:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-04-19  6:11 ` [PATCH] " Lofstedt, Marta
2018-04-19  7:03   ` Mika Kahola
2018-04-20 18:15     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-20 20:56       ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-24  8:14         ` Mika Kahola
2018-04-19 14:09 ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-20  6:42   ` Mika Kahola
2018-04-20  8:22     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-04-20 11:15       ` Mika Kahola
2018-04-23 19:21         ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-23 19:34           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-23 20:24             ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-23 20:17               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-24  7:41           ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgdie17i.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox