* [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs
@ 2017-03-02 14:21 Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 17:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs (rev2) Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-02 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Whilst investigating some mysterious failures with hangcheck not running
during gem_busy/basic-hang-default, the question is why did we decide to
cancel the retire_work (which queues the hangcheck)? That decision is
based around GT activity, so include that information in the debug
report.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 9b697fd03721..ee4bf6f71cab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1341,14 +1341,17 @@ static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
} else
seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n");
+ seq_printf(m, "GT active? %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
+
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
struct rb_node *rb;
seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", engine->name);
- seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x]\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x], inflight %d\n",
engine->hangcheck.seqno, seqno[id],
- intel_engine_last_submit(engine));
+ intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
+ engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
seq_printf(m, "\twaiters? %s, fake irq active? %s, stalled? %s\n",
yesno(intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)),
yesno(test_bit(engine->id,
@@ -3240,6 +3243,11 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
+ seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s\n",
+ yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
+ seq_printf(m, "Global active requests: %d\n",
+ dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
+
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq;
@@ -3247,11 +3255,12 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
u64 addr;
seq_printf(m, "%s\n", engine->name);
- seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms]\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms], inflight %d\n",
intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
engine->hangcheck.seqno,
- jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp));
+ jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp),
+ engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
rcu_read_lock();
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs
2017-03-02 14:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-02 15:03 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 15:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-02 17:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs (rev2) Patchwork
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-02 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Whilst investigating some mysterious failures with hangcheck not running
during gem_busy/basic-hang-default, the question is why did we decide to
cancel the retire_work (which queues the hangcheck)? That decision is
based around GT activity, so include that information in the debug
report.
v2: Include the GT awake status in the error state
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 9b697fd03721..ee4bf6f71cab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1341,14 +1341,17 @@ static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
} else
seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n");
+ seq_printf(m, "GT active? %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
+
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
struct rb_node *rb;
seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", engine->name);
- seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x]\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x], inflight %d\n",
engine->hangcheck.seqno, seqno[id],
- intel_engine_last_submit(engine));
+ intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
+ engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
seq_printf(m, "\twaiters? %s, fake irq active? %s, stalled? %s\n",
yesno(intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)),
yesno(test_bit(engine->id,
@@ -3240,6 +3243,11 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
+ seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s\n",
+ yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
+ seq_printf(m, "Global active requests: %d\n",
+ dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
+
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq;
@@ -3247,11 +3255,12 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
u64 addr;
seq_printf(m, "%s\n", engine->name);
- seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms]\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms], inflight %d\n",
intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
engine->hangcheck.seqno,
- jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp));
+ jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp),
+ engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7a2f2e4468d6..66f19924828a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ struct i915_gpu_state {
char error_msg[128];
bool simulated;
+ bool awake;
int iommu;
u32 reset_count;
u32 suspend_count;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 76855e1d8795..b4ae1464e0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
CSR_VERSION_MINOR(csr->version));
}
+ err_printf(m, "GT awake: %s\n", yesno(error->awake));
err_printf(m, "EIR: 0x%08x\n", error->eir);
err_printf(m, "IER: 0x%08x\n", error->ier);
for (i = 0; i < error->ngtier; i++)
@@ -1653,6 +1654,8 @@ static void i915_error_capture_msg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static void i915_capture_gen_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct i915_gpu_state *error)
{
+ error->awake = dev_priv->gt.awake;
+
error->iommu = -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
error->iommu = intel_iommu_gfx_mapped;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs
2017-03-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-02 15:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-03-02 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Whilst investigating some mysterious failures with hangcheck not running
> during gem_busy/basic-hang-default, the question is why did we decide to
> cancel the retire_work (which queues the hangcheck)? That decision is
> based around GT activity, so include that information in the debug
> report.
>
> v2: Include the GT awake status in the error state
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Noticed while testing this that we might not be so
interested in the instdone bits if the seqno is moving.
But nothing to do with this patch.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 9b697fd03721..ee4bf6f71cab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1341,14 +1341,17 @@ static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> } else
> seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n");
>
> + seq_printf(m, "GT active? %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
> +
> for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
> struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
> struct rb_node *rb;
>
> seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", engine->name);
> - seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x]\n",
> + seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x], inflight %d\n",
> engine->hangcheck.seqno, seqno[id],
> - intel_engine_last_submit(engine));
> + intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
> + engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
> seq_printf(m, "\twaiters? %s, fake irq active? %s, stalled? %s\n",
> yesno(intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)),
> yesno(test_bit(engine->id,
> @@ -3240,6 +3243,11 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>
> intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
>
> + seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s\n",
> + yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
> + seq_printf(m, "Global active requests: %d\n",
> + dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
> +
> for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
> struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq;
> @@ -3247,11 +3255,12 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> u64 addr;
>
> seq_printf(m, "%s\n", engine->name);
> - seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms]\n",
> + seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms], inflight %d\n",
> intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> intel_engine_last_submit(engine),
> engine->hangcheck.seqno,
> - jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp));
> + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp),
> + engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos);
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 7a2f2e4468d6..66f19924828a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -936,6 +936,7 @@ struct i915_gpu_state {
>
> char error_msg[128];
> bool simulated;
> + bool awake;
> int iommu;
> u32 reset_count;
> u32 suspend_count;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 76855e1d8795..b4ae1464e0ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> CSR_VERSION_MINOR(csr->version));
> }
>
> + err_printf(m, "GT awake: %s\n", yesno(error->awake));
> err_printf(m, "EIR: 0x%08x\n", error->eir);
> err_printf(m, "IER: 0x%08x\n", error->ier);
> for (i = 0; i < error->ngtier; i++)
> @@ -1653,6 +1654,8 @@ static void i915_error_capture_msg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> static void i915_capture_gen_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> + error->awake = dev_priv->gt.awake;
> +
> error->iommu = -1;
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> error->iommu = intel_iommu_gfx_mapped;
> --
> 2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs (rev2)
2017-03-02 14:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-02 17:18 ` Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-02 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/20562/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 20562v2 drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/20562/revisions/2/mbox/
Test gem_exec_flush:
Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
fail -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007
fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-bxt-t5700 total:278 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:247 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:259 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29
a5783262a0dd79ed8a7d244352378a3db668c5b2 drm-tip: 2017y-03m-02d-14h-56m-29s UTC integration manifest
0e78d6c drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4039/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-02 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-02 14:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-02 15:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-02 17:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs (rev2) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox