* [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
@ 2016-02-11 14:44 ville.syrjala
2016-02-12 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-15 15:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2016-02-11 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no
actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional
return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead
of just the one. But let's be consistent and add the 'else' anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index bbe18996efe6..040b86b9797f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4551,7 +4551,7 @@ bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
{
if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv))
return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
+ else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
return cpt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
return bxt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
--
2.4.10
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
2016-02-11 14:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected() ville.syrjala
@ 2016-02-12 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-15 15:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2016-02-12 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala, intel-gfx
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no
> actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional
> return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead
> of just the one. But let's be consistent and add the 'else' anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index bbe18996efe6..040b86b9797f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4551,7 +4551,7 @@ bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> {
> if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv))
> return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
> + else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
> return cpt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
> else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> return bxt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
2016-02-11 14:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected() ville.syrjala
2016-02-12 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2016-02-15 15:21 ` Patchwork
2016-02-15 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-02-15 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Summary ==
Series 3292v1 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3292/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
Subgroup basic-small-copy-xy:
pass -> DMESG-FAIL (ilk-hp8440p)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
Test pm_rpm:
Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
fail -> PASS (bdw-nuci7)
Subgroup basic-rte:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
bdw-nuci7 total:162 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10
bdw-ultra total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:13
bsw-nuc-2 total:165 pass:135 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29
byt-nuc total:165 pass:141 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
hsw-brixbox total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
hsw-gt2 total:165 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:10
ilk-hp8440p total:165 pass:115 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:48
ivb-t430s total:165 pass:150 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:14
skl-i5k-2 total:165 pass:149 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
snb-dellxps total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:22
snb-x220t total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:21
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1396/
f2110d8eac120416f8f5669f2aa561d9ab330a77 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-02m-15d-09h-53m-04s UTC integration manifest
bb6fd4ba57d864494466a3bd498428f71db09492 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
2016-02-15 15:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-02-15 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-02-15 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-02-15 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:21:54PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 3292v1 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3292/revisions/1/mbox/
>
> Test gem_mmap_gtt:
> Subgroup basic-small-copy-xy:
> pass -> DMESG-FAIL (ilk-hp8440p)
Some kind of corrupted spinlock:
[ 488.270400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000ffffeef7
[ 488.270487] IP: [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
[ 488.270555] PGD 13006a067 PUD 0
[ 488.270605] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 488.270667] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 ax88179_178a usbnet mii snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_generic intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_codec ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm mei_me mei lpc_ich sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core e1000e ptp pps_core [last unloaded: i915]
[ 488.271084] CPU: 0 PID: 6426 Comm: gem_mmap_gtt Tainted: G U 4.5.0-rc3-gfxbench+ #1
[ 488.271162] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8440p/172A, BIOS 68CCU Ver. F.24 09/13/2013
[ 488.271240] task: ffff8800b4afcb00 ti: ffff880132314000 task.ti: ffff880132314000
[ 488.271306] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810c9efc>] [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
[ 488.271387] RSP: 0018:ffff880132317c10 EFLAGS: 00010002
[ 488.271437] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8800b4afcb00 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 488.271499] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffeef7
[ 488.271561] RBP: ffff880132317cd0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 488.271623] R10: 00000000ffffeef7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 488.271685] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 488.271749] FS: 00007f700065a740(0000) GS:ffff880137c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 488.271820] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 488.271872] CR2: 00000000ffffeef7 CR3: 0000000130068000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 488.271934] Stack:
[ 488.271958] ffff880131f09c38 ffff8800b4afcb00 0000000000000005 0000000000000003
[ 488.272047] 0000000000000001 ffff8800b4afd350 ffff880132317d08 00000000000000b8
[ 488.272136] ffffffff00000000 ffff880131f09bb8 ffff8801329d1bc0 ffff880132317d98
[ 488.272224] Call Trace:
[ 488.272256] [<ffffffff81000ff7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x17/0x19
[ 488.272315] [<ffffffff810cc533>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1d0
[ 488.272368] [<ffffffff81236e78>] ? drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
[ 488.272426] [<ffffffff817b8c26>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x50
[ 488.272479] [<ffffffff81236e78>] ? drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
[ 488.272535] [<ffffffff81236e78>] drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
[ 488.272589] [<ffffffff81236e10>] ? do_coredump+0xf70/0xf70
[ 488.272645] [<ffffffff811d3899>] iterate_supers+0xa9/0x100
[ 488.272698] [<ffffffff81236f3e>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x4e/0xb0
[ 488.272761] [<ffffffff81246251>] proc_sys_call_handler+0xc1/0xe0
[ 488.272817] [<ffffffff8124627f>] proc_sys_write+0xf/0x20
[ 488.272868] [<ffffffff811cf263>] __vfs_write+0x23/0xe0
[ 488.272920] [<ffffffff810c5a22>] ? percpu_down_read+0x52/0x90
[ 488.272975] [<ffffffff811d35e4>] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0xf0
[ 488.273030] [<ffffffff811d35e4>] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0xf0
[ 488.273085] [<ffffffff811cffb4>] vfs_write+0xa4/0x190
[ 488.273136] [<ffffffff811ee67a>] ? __fget_light+0x6a/0x90
[ 488.273188] [<ffffffff811d0e54>] SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
[ 488.273237] [<ffffffff817b989b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x73
[ 488.273294] Code: b7 a7 01 85 c0 75 0a 45 3b 7e 28 0f 85 1f 0a 00 00 4d 85 f6 75 40 45 31 e4 48 8d 65 d8 44 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 <49> 81 3a c0 d4 ea 81 b8 00 00 00 00 44 0f 44 c0 41 83 ff 01 0f
[ 488.273912] RIP [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
[ 488.273975] RSP <ffff880132317c10>
[ 488.274009] CR2: 00000000ffffeef7
[ 488.274044] ---[ end trace cca43566d6f09c11 ]---
Imre and I had a look and this would seem to correspond to this C code:
if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
check = 0;
so the passed lockdep_map was garbage for some reason.
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
> Test pm_rpm:
> Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
*ERROR* Unclaimed access detected prior to suspending
Seems to have been there for quite a while. Filed a bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
> fail -> PASS (bdw-nuci7)
> Subgroup basic-rte:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
> pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
The rpm tests seem unstable. Bunch of random fails here and
there. Filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
>
> bdw-nuci7 total:162 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10
> bdw-ultra total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:13
> bsw-nuc-2 total:165 pass:135 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29
> byt-nuc total:165 pass:141 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
> hsw-brixbox total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> hsw-gt2 total:165 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:10
> ilk-hp8440p total:165 pass:115 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:48
> ivb-t430s total:165 pass:150 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:14
> skl-i5k-2 total:165 pass:149 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> snb-dellxps total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:22
> snb-x220t total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:21
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1396/
>
> f2110d8eac120416f8f5669f2aa561d9ab330a77 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-02m-15d-09h-53m-04s UTC integration manifest
> bb6fd4ba57d864494466a3bd498428f71db09492 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
2016-02-15 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2016-02-15 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-02-15 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:52:52PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:21:54PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Series 3292v1 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3292/revisions/1/mbox/
> >
> > Test gem_mmap_gtt:
> > Subgroup basic-small-copy-xy:
> > pass -> DMESG-FAIL (ilk-hp8440p)
>
> Some kind of corrupted spinlock:
>
> [ 488.270400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000ffffeef7
> [ 488.270487] IP: [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
> [ 488.270555] PGD 13006a067 PUD 0
> [ 488.270605] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 488.270667] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 ax88179_178a usbnet mii snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_generic intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hda_codec ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm mei_me mei lpc_ich sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core e1000e ptp pps_core [last unloaded: i915]
> [ 488.271084] CPU: 0 PID: 6426 Comm: gem_mmap_gtt Tainted: G U 4.5.0-rc3-gfxbench+ #1
> [ 488.271162] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8440p/172A, BIOS 68CCU Ver. F.24 09/13/2013
> [ 488.271240] task: ffff8800b4afcb00 ti: ffff880132314000 task.ti: ffff880132314000
> [ 488.271306] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810c9efc>] [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
> [ 488.271387] RSP: 0018:ffff880132317c10 EFLAGS: 00010002
> [ 488.271437] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8800b4afcb00 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 488.271499] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffeef7
> [ 488.271561] RBP: ffff880132317cd0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 488.271623] R10: 00000000ffffeef7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> [ 488.271685] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 488.271749] FS: 00007f700065a740(0000) GS:ffff880137c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 488.271820] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 488.271872] CR2: 00000000ffffeef7 CR3: 0000000130068000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [ 488.271934] Stack:
> [ 488.271958] ffff880131f09c38 ffff8800b4afcb00 0000000000000005 0000000000000003
> [ 488.272047] 0000000000000001 ffff8800b4afd350 ffff880132317d08 00000000000000b8
> [ 488.272136] ffffffff00000000 ffff880131f09bb8 ffff8801329d1bc0 ffff880132317d98
> [ 488.272224] Call Trace:
> [ 488.272256] [<ffffffff81000ff7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x17/0x19
> [ 488.272315] [<ffffffff810cc533>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1d0
> [ 488.272368] [<ffffffff81236e78>] ? drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
> [ 488.272426] [<ffffffff817b8c26>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x50
> [ 488.272479] [<ffffffff81236e78>] ? drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
> [ 488.272535] [<ffffffff81236e78>] drop_pagecache_sb+0x68/0xe0
> [ 488.272589] [<ffffffff81236e10>] ? do_coredump+0xf70/0xf70
> [ 488.272645] [<ffffffff811d3899>] iterate_supers+0xa9/0x100
> [ 488.272698] [<ffffffff81236f3e>] drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x4e/0xb0
> [ 488.272761] [<ffffffff81246251>] proc_sys_call_handler+0xc1/0xe0
> [ 488.272817] [<ffffffff8124627f>] proc_sys_write+0xf/0x20
> [ 488.272868] [<ffffffff811cf263>] __vfs_write+0x23/0xe0
> [ 488.272920] [<ffffffff810c5a22>] ? percpu_down_read+0x52/0x90
> [ 488.272975] [<ffffffff811d35e4>] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0xf0
> [ 488.273030] [<ffffffff811d35e4>] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0xf0
> [ 488.273085] [<ffffffff811cffb4>] vfs_write+0xa4/0x190
> [ 488.273136] [<ffffffff811ee67a>] ? __fget_light+0x6a/0x90
> [ 488.273188] [<ffffffff811d0e54>] SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
> [ 488.273237] [<ffffffff817b989b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x73
> [ 488.273294] Code: b7 a7 01 85 c0 75 0a 45 3b 7e 28 0f 85 1f 0a 00 00 4d 85 f6 75 40 45 31 e4 48 8d 65 d8 44 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 <49> 81 3a c0 d4 ea 81 b8 00 00 00 00 44 0f 44 c0 41 83 ff 01 0f
> [ 488.273912] RIP [<ffffffff810c9efc>] __lock_acquire+0x1ac/0x1f70
> [ 488.273975] RSP <ffff880132317c10>
> [ 488.274009] CR2: 00000000ffffeef7
> [ 488.274044] ---[ end trace cca43566d6f09c11 ]---
>
> Imre and I had a look and this would seem to correspond to this C code:
> if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
> check = 0;
>
> so the passed lockdep_map was garbage for some reason.
>
> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
> > Test pm_rpm:
> > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
>
> *ERROR* Unclaimed access detected prior to suspending
>
> Seems to have been there for quite a while. Filed a bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94164
>
> > fail -> PASS (bdw-nuci7)
> > Subgroup basic-rte:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
> > pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
>
> The rpm tests seem unstable. Bunch of random fails here and
> there. Filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94163
None of that seems related to my little 'else' so I went and pushed
the patch to dinq. Thanks for the review.
>
> >
> > bdw-nuci7 total:162 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10
> > bdw-ultra total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:13
> > bsw-nuc-2 total:165 pass:135 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29
> > byt-nuc total:165 pass:141 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
> > hsw-brixbox total:165 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> > hsw-gt2 total:165 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:10
> > ilk-hp8440p total:165 pass:115 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:48
> > ivb-t430s total:165 pass:150 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:14
> > skl-i5k-2 total:165 pass:149 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> > snb-dellxps total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:22
> > snb-x220t total:165 pass:142 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:21
> >
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1396/
> >
> > f2110d8eac120416f8f5669f2aa561d9ab330a77 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-02m-15d-09h-53m-04s UTC integration manifest
> > bb6fd4ba57d864494466a3bd498428f71db09492 drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-15 17:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-11 14:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected() ville.syrjala
2016-02-12 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-15 15:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-02-15 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-02-15 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox