From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Simplify scanline_offset handling for gen2
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:20:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plt5j7ny.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528185647.7765-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 28 May 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently intel_crtc_scanline_offset() is careful to always
> return a positive offset. That is not actually necessary
> as long as we take care of negative values when applying the
> offset in __intel_get_crtc_scanline().
>
> This simplifies intel_crtc_scanline_offset(), and makes
> the scanline_offfset arithmetic more symmetric between
> the forwad (__intel_get_crtc_scanline()) and reverse
*forward
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> (intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw()) directions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> index 31fa5867e1a7..b0e95a4c680d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> * See update_scanline_offset() for the details on the
> * scanline_offset adjustment.
> */
> - return (position + crtc->scanline_offset) % vtotal;
> + return (position + vtotal + crtc->scanline_offset) % vtotal;
> }
>
> int intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw(struct intel_crtc *crtc, int scanline)
> @@ -470,7 +470,6 @@ void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> static int intel_crtc_scanline_offset(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
>
> /*
> * The scanline counter increments at the leading edge of hsync.
> @@ -482,8 +481,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_scanline_offset(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> * last active line), the scanline counter will read vblank_start-1.
> *
> * On gen2 the scanline counter starts counting from 1 instead
> - * of vtotal-1, so we have to subtract one (or rather add vtotal-1
> - * to keep the value positive), instead of adding one.
> + * of vtotal-1, so we have to subtract one.
> *
> * On HSW+ the behaviour of the scanline counter depends on the output
> * type. For DP ports it behaves like most other platforms, but on HDMI
> @@ -500,7 +498,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_scanline_offset(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> * answer that's slightly in the future.
> */
> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 2)
> - return intel_mode_vtotal(adjusted_mode) - 1;
> + return -1;
> else if (HAS_DDI(i915) && intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI))
> return 2;
> else
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 18:56 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Cleanups around scanline arithmetic Ville Syrjala
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Reuse intel_mode_vblank_start() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:03 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Extract intel_mode_vblank_end() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Extract intel_mode_vtotal() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:06 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Simplify scanline_offset handling for gen2 Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Move intel_crtc_scanline_offset() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:22 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Switch intel_usecs_to_scanlines() to 64bit maths Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:22 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 18:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dsb: Convert dewake_scanline to a hw scanline number earlier Ville Syrjala
2024-05-29 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-28 20:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Cleanups around scanline arithmetic Patchwork
2024-05-29 14:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plt5j7ny.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox