From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Do not read the transcoder register for mipi dsi
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:48:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87woc64orp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111105207.7583-1-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com> wrote:
> As per the Bspec the port mapping is fixed for mipi dsi
The "tgl" in the patch subject is slightly confusing, because this isn't
new to tgl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index f1328c08f4ad..d4a8617d6185 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10397,21 +10397,38 @@ static bool bxt_get_dsi_transcoder_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return transcoder_is_dsi(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> }
>
> -static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +static enum port
> +intel_transcoder_to_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
This is also confusing naming because this is definitely not universal
across platforms.
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> enum port port;
> u32 tmp;
>
> - tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder));
> + /* DSI transcoders have fixed ddi mapping*/
> + if (transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)) {
> + port = (cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_DSI_A) ? PORT_A : PORT_B;
> + return port;
> + }
I think I'd just add that in the existing haswell_get_ddi_port_state()
without another function.
if (dsi) {
} else {
do the below
>
> + tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> port = TGL_TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_VAL_TO_PORT(tmp);
> else
> port = TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_VAL_TO_PORT(tmp);
>
> + return port;
> +}
> +
> +static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> + enum port port;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + port = intel_transcoder_to_port(dev_priv, pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> +
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> icelake_get_ddi_pll(dev_priv, port, pipe_config);
> else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Do not read the transcoder register for mipi dsi
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:48:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87woc64orp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191111114842.qnVyG8yiiFnskFzTXFVv3BqqNvUFXU2yAF50FS0rcko@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111105207.7583-1-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com> wrote:
> As per the Bspec the port mapping is fixed for mipi dsi
The "tgl" in the patch subject is slightly confusing, because this isn't
new to tgl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index f1328c08f4ad..d4a8617d6185 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10397,21 +10397,38 @@ static bool bxt_get_dsi_transcoder_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return transcoder_is_dsi(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> }
>
> -static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +static enum port
> +intel_transcoder_to_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
This is also confusing naming because this is definitely not universal
across platforms.
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> enum port port;
> u32 tmp;
>
> - tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder));
> + /* DSI transcoders have fixed ddi mapping*/
> + if (transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)) {
> + port = (cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_DSI_A) ? PORT_A : PORT_B;
> + return port;
> + }
I think I'd just add that in the existing haswell_get_ddi_port_state()
without another function.
if (dsi) {
} else {
do the below
>
> + tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> port = TGL_TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_VAL_TO_PORT(tmp);
> else
> port = TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_VAL_TO_PORT(tmp);
>
> + return port;
> +}
> +
> +static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> + enum port port;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + port = intel_transcoder_to_port(dev_priv, pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> +
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> icelake_get_ddi_pll(dev_priv, port, pipe_config);
> else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 10:52 [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Do not read the transcoder register for mipi dsi Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-11 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-11 11:48 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-11-11 11:48 ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-11 16:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-11-11 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-11 16:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-11 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 4:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-11-12 4:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87woc64orp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vandita.kulkarni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox