* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly
@ 2023-06-09 22:02 Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-06-09 23:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2023-06-09 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel
We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply
it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe.
This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before
reset and then performs a GT reset.
Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency")
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 01b75529311c..ee9f83af7cf6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
if (unlikely(ret))
return ret;
slpc_to_gt(slpc)->defaults.min_freq = slpc->min_freq_softlimit;
- } else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) {
+ } else {
return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc,
slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly 2023-06-09 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2023-06-09 23:11 ` Patchwork 2023-06-11 11:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-09 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5401 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119162/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13257 -> Patchwork_119162v1 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/index.html Participating hosts (36 -> 37) ------------------------------ Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119162v1 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][3] ([i915#1886] / [i915#7913]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate: - bat-atsm-1: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#7699] / [i915#7913]) [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/bat-atsm-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/bat-atsm-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html * igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#109271]) +14 similar issues [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast.html * igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend: - fi-ivb-3770: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271]) [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-ivb-3770/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html * igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs: - {bat-mtlp-8}: [DMESG-FAIL][9] ([i915#7059]) -> [PASS][10] [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@guc: - bat-rpls-2: [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#7852]) -> [PASS][12] [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: - fi-ivb-3770: [INCOMPLETE][13] ([i915#7913]) -> [PASS][14] [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886 [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190 [i915#3637]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3637 [i915#4309]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4309 [i915#4423]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4423 [i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579 [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613 [i915#6121]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6121 [i915#6367]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367 [i915#6763]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6763 [i915#6868]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6868 [i915#7059]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7059 [i915#7699]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7699 [i915#7852]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7852 [i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913 [i915#8497]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8497 Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_13257 -> Patchwork_119162v1 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_13257: ce4482577d084a40755e177398f4c577423548e5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_7324: 32b74aedc08e31b0143d29d7de56c5ba63eb310a @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_119162v1: ce4482577d084a40755e177398f4c577423548e5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux ### Linux commits e2fba2f2bce4 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/index.html [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6110 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly 2023-06-09 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly Vinay Belgaumkar 2023-06-09 23:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork @ 2023-06-11 11:35 ` Patchwork 2023-06-14 2:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh 2023-06-15 17:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-11 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13863 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119162/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13257_full -> Patchwork_119162v1_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. Participating hosts (7 -> 7) ------------------------------ No changes in participating hosts Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119162v1_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +1 similar issue [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl2/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@parallel-random.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3323]) [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync.html * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937] / [i915#4579]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-primary-rotation-180-4_tiled_dg2_rc_ccs: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +122 similar issues [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-primary-rotation-180-4_tiled_dg2_rc_ccs.html * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +3 similar issues [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html * igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms@pipe-a-dp-1: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][6] ([i915#7173]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms@pipe-a-dp-1.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions: - shard-apl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2346]) [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-apl1/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html * igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271]) +18 similar issues [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-snb4/igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip.html * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-linear-to-64bpp-linear-downscaling@pipe-a-valid-mode: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579]) +8 similar issues [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-linear-to-64bpp-linear-downscaling@pipe-a-valid-mode.html * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1: - shard-apl: [PASS][11] -> [ABORT][12] ([i915#180]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-apl2/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl2/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@constant-alpha-max@pipe-c-dp-1: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#4573]) +1 similar issue [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@constant-alpha-max@pipe-c-dp-1.html * igt@kms_plane_scaling@plane-upscale-with-modifiers-factor-0-25@pipe-b-hdmi-a-1: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579]) +12 similar issues [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-snb1/igt@kms_plane_scaling@plane-upscale-with-modifiers-factor-0-25@pipe-b-hdmi-a-1.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-continuous-sf: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-continuous-sf.html * igt@kms_setmode@basic@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#5465]) +1 similar issue [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-snb1/igt@kms_setmode@basic@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-fb-id: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl2/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-fb-id.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@drm_fdinfo@most-busy-idle-check-all@rcs0: - {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][18] ([i915#7742]) -> [PASS][19] [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-rkl-4/igt@drm_fdinfo@most-busy-idle-check-all@rcs0.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-rkl-3/igt@drm_fdinfo@most-busy-idle-check-all@rcs0.html * igt@gem_barrier_race@remote-request@rcs0: - shard-apl: [ABORT][20] ([i915#7461] / [i915#8211] / [i915#8234]) -> [PASS][21] [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-apl1/igt@gem_barrier_race@remote-request@rcs0.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@gem_barrier_race@remote-request@rcs0.html * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: - shard-apl: [ABORT][22] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][23] +1 similar issue [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-apl2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-apl1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html * igt@gem_exec_endless@dispatch@rcs0: - {shard-rkl}: [TIMEOUT][24] ([i915#3778]) -> [PASS][25] [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-rkl-4/igt@gem_exec_endless@dispatch@rcs0.html [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_exec_endless@dispatch@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0: - {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][26] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][27] [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0.html [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0: - shard-glk: [FAIL][28] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][29] +1 similar issue [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@smem-oom@lmem0: - {shard-dg1}: [DMESG-WARN][30] ([i915#4936] / [i915#5493]) -> [PASS][31] [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-dg1-12/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@smem-oom@lmem0.html [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-dg1-19/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@smem-oom@lmem0.html * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms: - {shard-tglu}: [FAIL][32] ([i915#3989] / [i915#454]) -> [PASS][33] [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-tglu-6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-tglu-9/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-lpsp: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][34] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][35] [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-rkl-4/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-lpsp.html [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-rkl-7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-lpsp.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-non-lpsp-stress: - {shard-dg1}: [SKIP][36] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][37] [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-dg1-19/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-non-lpsp-stress.html [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-dg1-18/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-non-lpsp-stress.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size: - shard-glk: [FAIL][38] ([i915#2346]) -> [PASS][39] [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-glk7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-glk8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@single-move@pipe-b: - {shard-rkl}: [INCOMPLETE][40] ([i915#8011]) -> [PASS][41] +1 similar issue [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-rkl-7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@single-move@pipe-b.html [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-rkl-2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@single-move@pipe-b.html - {shard-dg1}: [INCOMPLETE][42] ([i915#8011] / [i915#8347]) -> [PASS][43] [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13257/shard-dg1-19/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@single-move@pipe-b.html [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/shard-dg1-17/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@single-move@pipe-b.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#109280]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280 [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315 [fdo#110189]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110189 [fdo#111615]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111615 [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072 [i915#1397]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1397 [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180 [i915#1937]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1937 [i915#2346]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2346 [i915#2437]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2437 [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575 [i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842 [i915#3323]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3323 [i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555 [i915#3689]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3689 [i915#3778]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3778 [i915#3804]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3804 [i915#3886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3886 [i915#3955]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3955 [i915#3989]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3989 [i915#4070]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4070 [i915#4078]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4078 [i915#454]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/454 [i915#4573]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4573 [i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579 [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613 [i915#4816]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4816 [i915#4936]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4936 [i915#4983]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983 [i915#5176]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5176 [i915#5235]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5235 [i915#5354]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5354 [i915#5465]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5465 [i915#5493]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5493 [i915#6095]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6095 [i915#6268]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6268 [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658 [i915#6755]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6755 [i915#7173]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7173 [i915#7392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7392 [i915#7461]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7461 [i915#7742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7742 [i915#7967]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7967 [i915#8011]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8011 [i915#8211]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8211 [i915#8234]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8234 [i915#8247]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8247 [i915#8292]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8292 [i915#8347]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8347 Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_13257 -> Patchwork_119162v1 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_13257: ce4482577d084a40755e177398f4c577423548e5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_7324: 32b74aedc08e31b0143d29d7de56c5ba63eb310a @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_119162v1: ce4482577d084a40755e177398f4c577423548e5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119162v1/index.html [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14574 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly 2023-06-09 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly Vinay Belgaumkar 2023-06-09 23:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2023-06-11 11:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork @ 2023-06-14 2:25 ` Dixit, Ashutosh 2023-06-14 7:35 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay 2023-06-15 17:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh 3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2023-06-14 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hi Vinay, > We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply > it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. regardless > This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before > reset and then performs a GT reset. Can you explain the reason for the patch clearly in terms of variables in the code, what variable has what value and what is the bug. I am not following from the above description. Thanks. -- Ashutosh > > Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency") > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > index 01b75529311c..ee9f83af7cf6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > if (unlikely(ret)) > return ret; > slpc_to_gt(slpc)->defaults.min_freq = slpc->min_freq_softlimit; > - } else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) { > + } else { > return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, > slpc->min_freq_softlimit); > } > -- > 2.38.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly 2023-06-14 2:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2023-06-14 7:35 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Belgaumkar, Vinay @ 2023-06-14 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dixit, Ashutosh; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel On 6/13/2023 7:25 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hi Vinay, > >> We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply >> it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. > regardless > >> This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before >> reset and then performs a GT reset. > Can you explain the reason for the patch clearly in terms of variables in > the code, what variable has what value and what is the bug. I am not > following from the above description. Hi Ashutosh, Scenario being fixed here is exactly the one in i915_pm_freq_api reset/suspend subtests (currently in review). Test sets min freq to RPn and then performs a reset. It then checks if cur_freq is RPn. Here's the sequence that shows the problem- RPLS:/home/gta# modprobe i915 RPLS:/home/gta# echo 1 > /sys/class/drm/card0/gt/gt0/slpc_ignore_eff_freq RPLS:/home/gta# echo 300 > /sys/class/drm/card0/gt_min_freq_mhz (RPn) RPLS:/home/gta# cat /sys/class/drm/card0/gt_cur_freq_mhz --> cur == RPn as expected 300 RPLS:/home/gta# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gt0/reset --> reset RPLS:/home/gta# cat /sys/class/drm/card0/gt_min_freq_mhz --> shows the internal cached variable correctly 300 RPLS:/home/gta# cat /sys/class/drm/card0/gt_cur_freq_mhz --> actual freq being requested by SLPC (it's not RPn!!) 700 We need to sync up driver min freq value and SLPC min after a reset/suspend. Currently, we skip if the user had manually set min to RPn (this was an optimization we had before we enabled efficient freq usage). Thanks, Vinay. > > Thanks. > -- > Ashutosh > > >> Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency") >> >> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c >> index 01b75529311c..ee9f83af7cf6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c >> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) >> if (unlikely(ret)) >> return ret; >> slpc_to_gt(slpc)->defaults.min_freq = slpc->min_freq_softlimit; >> - } else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) { >> + } else { >> return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, >> slpc->min_freq_softlimit); >> } >> -- >> 2.38.1 >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly 2023-06-09 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly Vinay Belgaumkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2023-06-14 2:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2023-06-15 17:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2023-06-15 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hi Vinay, > We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply > it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. > This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before > reset and then performs a GT reset. > > Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency") > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > index 01b75529311c..ee9f83af7cf6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > if (unlikely(ret)) > return ret; > slpc_to_gt(slpc)->defaults.min_freq = slpc->min_freq_softlimit; > - } else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) { > + } else { > return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, > slpc->min_freq_softlimit); IMO the current code is unnecessarily complicated and confusing and similar changes (with a little tweaking) should be made for max_freq too. But at least this is a step in the right direction so: Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> > } > -- > 2.38.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-15 17:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-06-09 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly Vinay Belgaumkar 2023-06-09 23:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2023-06-11 11:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2023-06-14 2:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh 2023-06-14 7:35 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay 2023-06-15 17:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox