* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/mm: Add an iterator to optimally walk over holes for an allocation (v2)
2022-02-04 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/mm: Add an iterator to optimally walk over holes for an allocation (v2) Vivek Kasireddy
@ 2022-02-07 10:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2022-02-07 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vivek Kasireddy, dri-devel; +Cc: intel-gfx, Nirmoy Das, Christian König
On 04/02/2022 01:19, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> This iterator relies on drm_mm_first_hole() and drm_mm_next_hole()
> functions to identify suitable holes for an allocation of a given
> size by efficiently traversing the rbtree associated with the given
> allocator.
>
> It replaces the for loop in drm_mm_insert_node_in_range() and can
> also be used by drm drivers to quickly identify holes of a certain
> size within a given range.
>
> v2: (Tvrtko)
> - Prepend a double underscore for the newly exported first/next_hole
> - s/each_best_hole/each_suitable_hole/g
> - Mask out DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE from the mode before calling
> first/next_hole and elsewhere.
>
> Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/drm/drm_mm.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> index 8257f9d4f619..b6da1dffcfcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> @@ -352,10 +352,10 @@ static struct drm_mm_node *find_hole_addr(struct drm_mm *mm, u64 addr, u64 size)
> return node;
> }
>
> -static struct drm_mm_node *
> -first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> - u64 start, u64 end, u64 size,
> - enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode)
> +struct drm_mm_node *
> +__drm_mm_first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> + u64 start, u64 end, u64 size,
> + enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode)
> {
> switch (mode) {
> default:
> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> hole_stack);
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_mm_first_hole);
>
> /**
> * DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR - macro to declare next hole functions
> @@ -410,11 +411,11 @@ static struct drm_mm_node *name(struct drm_mm_node *entry, u64 size) \
> DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR(next_hole_high_addr, rb_left, rb_right)
> DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR(next_hole_low_addr, rb_right, rb_left)
>
> -static struct drm_mm_node *
> -next_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> - struct drm_mm_node *node,
> - u64 size,
> - enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode)
> +struct drm_mm_node *
> +__drm_mm_next_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> + struct drm_mm_node *node,
> + u64 size,
> + enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode)
> {
> switch (mode) {
> default:
> @@ -432,6 +433,7 @@ next_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> return &node->hole_stack == &mm->hole_stack ? NULL : node;
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_mm_next_hole);
>
> /**
> * drm_mm_reserve_node - insert an pre-initialized node
> @@ -520,7 +522,6 @@ int drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(struct drm_mm * const mm,
> {
> struct drm_mm_node *hole;
> u64 remainder_mask;
> - bool once;
>
> DRM_MM_BUG_ON(range_start > range_end);
>
> @@ -533,22 +534,19 @@ int drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(struct drm_mm * const mm,
> if (alignment <= 1)
> alignment = 0;
>
> - once = mode & DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE;
> - mode &= ~DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE;
> -
> remainder_mask = is_power_of_2(alignment) ? alignment - 1 : 0;
> - for (hole = first_hole(mm, range_start, range_end, size, mode);
> - hole;
> - hole = once ? NULL : next_hole(mm, hole, size, mode)) {
> + drm_mm_for_each_suitable_hole(hole, mm, range_start, range_end,
> + size, mode) {
> u64 hole_start = __drm_mm_hole_node_start(hole);
> u64 hole_end = hole_start + hole->hole_size;
> u64 adj_start, adj_end;
> u64 col_start, col_end;
> + enum drm_mm_insert_mode placement = mode & ~DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE;
Could move outside the loop, but not sure if it matters much.
Could also call the masked out variable mode and the passed in one
caller_mode, or something, and that way have a smaller diff. (Four
following hunks wouldn't be there.)
>
> - if (mode == DRM_MM_INSERT_LOW && hole_start >= range_end)
> + if (placement == DRM_MM_INSERT_LOW && hole_start >= range_end)
> break;
>
> - if (mode == DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH && hole_end <= range_start)
> + if (placement == DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH && hole_end <= range_start)
> break;
>
> col_start = hole_start;
> @@ -562,7 +560,7 @@ int drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(struct drm_mm * const mm,
> if (adj_end <= adj_start || adj_end - adj_start < size)
> continue;
>
> - if (mode == DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH)
> + if (placement == DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH)
> adj_start = adj_end - size;
>
> if (alignment) {
> @@ -574,7 +572,7 @@ int drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(struct drm_mm * const mm,
> div64_u64_rem(adj_start, alignment, &rem);
> if (rem) {
> adj_start -= rem;
> - if (mode != DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH)
> + if (placement != DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH)
> adj_start += alignment;
>
> if (adj_start < max(col_start, range_start) ||
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mm.h b/include/drm/drm_mm.h
> index ac33ba1b18bc..777f659f9692 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mm.h
> @@ -400,6 +400,42 @@ static inline u64 drm_mm_hole_node_end(const struct drm_mm_node *hole_node)
> 1 : 0; \
> pos = list_next_entry(pos, hole_stack))
>
> +struct drm_mm_node *
> +__drm_mm_first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> + u64 start, u64 end, u64 size,
> + enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode);
> +
> +struct drm_mm_node *
> +__drm_mm_next_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
> + struct drm_mm_node *node,
> + u64 size,
> + enum drm_mm_insert_mode mode);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_mm_for_each_suitable_hole - iterator to optimally walk over all
> + * holes that can fit an allocation of the given @size.
> + * @pos: &drm_mm_node used internally to track progress
> + * @mm: &drm_mm allocator to walk
> + * @range_start: start of the allowed range for the allocation
> + * @range_end: end of the allowed range for the allocation
> + * @size: size of the allocation
> + * @mode: fine-tune the allocation search
> + *
> + * This iterator walks over all holes suitable for the allocation of given
> + * @size in a very efficient manner. It is implemented by calling
> + * drm_mm_first_hole() and drm_mm_next_hole() which identify the
> + * appropriate holes within the given range by efficiently traversing the
> + * rbtree associated with @mm.
> + */
> +#define drm_mm_for_each_suitable_hole(pos, mm, range_start, range_end, \
> + size, mode) \
> + for (pos = __drm_mm_first_hole(mm, range_start, range_end, size, \
> + mode & ~DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE); \
> + pos; \
> + pos = mode & DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE ? \
> + NULL : __drm_mm_next_hole(mm, hole, size, \
> + mode & ~DRM_MM_INSERT_ONCE))
> +
> /*
> * Basic range manager support (drm_mm.c)
> */
Nitpicks/bikesheds or not, patch LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Adding Christian and Das to Cc, by the virtue of being last people
active in the hole area (!). :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread