From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>,
Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:55:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ef06c2a-1ca6-7cf6-0f21-1722bdc4b4fb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e71f8d2-fd50-4550-5168-240c6f703c7f@linux.intel.com>
On 08/09/2022 15:32, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
>
> I fixed a similar issue in DII but I couldn't reproduce it in drm
>
> http://intel-gfx-pw.fi.intel.com/patch/228850/?series=15910&rev=2.
>
> I wonder if that fixes the problem you are facing then I can send that
> to drm.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 7809be3a6840..5438e9277924 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ void i915_gem_init_early(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
>
> void i915_gem_cleanup_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - i915_gem_drain_freed_objects(dev_priv);
> + i915_gem_drain_workqueue(dev_priv);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&dev_priv->mm.free_list));
> GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.free_count));
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, dev_priv->mm.shrink_count);
Yes why not, more black magic (count to three) but if it works... :) I
also spy the general area has been a bit neglected. Like:
i915_gem_driver_remove:
...
i915_gem_drain_workqueue
i915_gem_drain_freed_objects
While i915_gem_drain_workqueue:
...
i915_gem_drain_freed_objects
So i915_gem_drain_freed_objects in i915_gem_driver_remove is redundant
already.
Should i915_gem_drain_freed_objects be unexported and all callers made
just call i915_gem_drain_workqueue after your patch? Or if "drain free
objects" is considered more self descriptive it could be made as an
alias to i915_gem_drain_workqueue.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
> On 9/6/2022 7:46 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> On gen3 the selftests are pretty much always tripping this:
>> <4> [383.822424] pci 0000:00:02.0: drm_WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count)
>> <4> [383.822546] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3560 at
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1223 i915_gem_cleanup_early+0x96/0xb0
>> [i915]
>>
>> Looks to be due to the status page object lingering on the
>> purge_list. Call synchronize_rcu() ahead of it to make more
>> sure all objects have been freed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index 0f49ec9d494a..5b61f7ad6473 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -1098,6 +1098,7 @@ void i915_gem_drain_freed_objects(struct
>> drm_i915_private *i915)
>> flush_delayed_work(&i915->bdev.wq);
>> rcu_barrier();
>> }
>> + synchronize_rcu();
>> }
>> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 17:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects Ville Syrjala
2022-09-06 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-09-06 18:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-06 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-09-08 12:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-08 13:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-08 14:32 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 14:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-09-08 19:22 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 15:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-08 19:34 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-09 7:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-21 7:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-22 8:39 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ef06c2a-1ca6-7cf6-0f21-1722bdc4b4fb@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox