From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:56:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyrDtvelxyo2MEGe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxrrc33z38fvf22h@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:29:55AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> >
> > On 9/8/2022 5:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> > >> Hi Ville,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I fixed a similar issue in DII but I couldn't reproduce it in drm
> > >>
> > >> http://intel-gfx-pw.fi.intel.com/patch/228850/?series=15910&rev=2.
> > >>
> > >> I wonder if that fixes the problem you are facing then I can send that
> > >> to drm.
> > > CI can tell you. It has been complaining about this for ages
> >
> >
> > Could you please share a url/failed test name. I must be searching the
> > wrong hw/test(https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-ivb-3770.html).
>
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12102/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
>
> gen3 hits it nearly 100% of the time in the live selftests.
> IIRC it also looked like shard-snb has also hit it more
> sporadically in some tests.
>
> There's also at least one bug about it
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4528
> which I guess is why ci is able to ignore this, and that
> then has enabled all the humans to ignore it as well.
Did we get anywhere with this? I'm getting tired of
seeing the red in CI.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 17:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects Ville Syrjala
2022-09-06 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-09-06 18:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-06 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-09-08 12:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-08 13:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-08 14:32 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 14:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-08 19:22 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 15:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-08 19:34 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-09 7:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-21 7:56 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-09-22 8:39 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-09-08 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyrDtvelxyo2MEGe@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox