Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
@ 2023-01-10 16:44 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2023-01-10 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, Tvrtko Ursulin,
	David Airlie, Daniel Vetter
  Cc: intel-gfx, linux-hardening, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	Gustavo A. R. Silva

Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards
adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length
arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array
members.

This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2].

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header {
 
 struct guc_debug_capture_list {
 	struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header;
-	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0];
+	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[];
 } __packed;
 
 /**
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t {
 
 struct guc_state_capture_t {
 	struct guc_state_capture_header_t header;
-	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0];
+	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[];
 } __packed;
 
 enum guc_capture_group_types {
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t {
 /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */
 struct guc_state_capture_group_t {
 	struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header;
-	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0];
+	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[];
 } __packed;
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
  2023-01-10 16:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
  2023-01-10 19:42   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2023-01-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2023-01-11  4:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2023-01-10 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
  Cc: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, linux-hardening,
	Daniel Vetter, David Airlie


On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards
> adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length
> arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array
> members.
> 
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2].
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header {
>  
>  struct guc_debug_capture_list {
>  	struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header;
> -	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0];
> +	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[];
>  } __packed;
>  
>  /**
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t {
>  
>  struct guc_state_capture_t {
>  	struct guc_state_capture_header_t header;
> -	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0];
> +	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[];
>  } __packed;
>  
>  enum guc_capture_group_types {
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t {
>  /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */
>  struct guc_state_capture_group_t {
>  	struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header;
> -	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0];
> +	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[];

Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...).
Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using
the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account?

>  } __packed;
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
  2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
@ 2023-01-10 19:42   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2023-01-11  9:16     ` Rodrigo Vivi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2023-01-10 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rodrigo Vivi
  Cc: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, linux-hardening,
	Daniel Vetter, David Airlie

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards
> > adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length
> > arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array
> > members.
> > 
> > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2].
> > 
> > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
> > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2]
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header {
> >  
> >  struct guc_debug_capture_list {
> >  	struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header;
> > -	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0];
> > +	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[];
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t {
> >  
> >  struct guc_state_capture_t {
> >  	struct guc_state_capture_header_t header;
> > -	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0];
> > +	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[];
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> >  enum guc_capture_group_types {
> > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t {
> >  /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */
> >  struct guc_state_capture_group_t {
> >  	struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header;
> > -	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0];
> > +	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[];
> 
> Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...).

Yep; I noticed that. :)

> Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using
> the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account?

Not necessarily. In recent times, we don't include the struct_size
changes in the same patch as the flex-array transformation. That's
usually a follow-up patch.

--
Gustavo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
  2023-01-10 16:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
@ 2023-01-10 20:10 ` Patchwork
  2023-01-11  4:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-01-10 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6352 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112621/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12569 -> Patchwork_112621v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/index.html

Participating hosts (41 -> 40)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-rkl-11600 
  Missing    (2): fi-kbl-soraka fi-snb-2520m 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_112621v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@debugfs_test@basic-hwmon:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([i915#7456])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@debugfs_test@basic-hwmon.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([i915#2190])
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html

  * igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#3282])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([i915#7561])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][6] ([i915#4817])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@dp-hpd-fast:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([i915#7828]) +7 similar issues
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@dp-hpd-fast.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#4103])
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor.html

  * igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109285] / [i915#4098])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect.html

  * igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#1072]) +3 similar issues
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#3555] / [i915#4098])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-read:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#109295] / [i915#3291] / [i915#3708]) +2 similar issues
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_vgem@basic-read.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
    - fi-rkl-11600:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109295] / [i915#3301] / [i915#3708])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/fi-rkl-11600/igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc:
    - {bat-adlp-9}:       [INCOMPLETE][14] ([i915#4983]) -> [PASS][15]
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/bat-adlp-9/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/bat-adlp-9/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
  [fdo#109295]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109295
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#3282]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3282
  [i915#3291]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3291
  [i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
  [i915#3546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3546
  [i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
  [i915#3708]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3708
  [i915#4098]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4098
  [i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#4817]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4817
  [i915#4983]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983
  [i915#6367]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367
  [i915#6997]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6997
  [i915#7456]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7456
  [i915#7561]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7561
  [i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_12569 -> Patchwork_112621v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_12569: 739b2ee4e76d9cd64e5fbe834b682e550e496cf4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7115: c162d70b00c6f4cf6a0ba1ca7a7e2ad8f7190646 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_112621v1: 739b2ee4e76d9cd64e5fbe834b682e550e496cf4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

4611f7fed82a drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7232 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
  2023-01-10 16:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
  2023-01-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2023-01-11  4:57 ` Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-01-11  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11792 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112621/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12569_full -> Patchwork_112621v1_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/index.html

Participating hosts (14 -> 11)
------------------------------

  Missing    (3): pig-skl-6260u pig-kbl-iris pig-glk-j5005 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_112621v1_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#2017])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-glk1/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-glk5/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@drm_fdinfo@idle@rcs0:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][5] ([i915#7742]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-1/igt@drm_fdinfo@idle@rcs0.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-2/igt@drm_fdinfo@idle@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@bcs0:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][7] ([fdo#103375]) -> [PASS][8] +3 similar issues
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@bcs0.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wc-read-noreloc:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][11] ([i915#3281]) -> [PASS][12] +7 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wc-read-noreloc.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wc-read-noreloc.html

  * igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][13] ([i915#3282]) -> [PASS][14] +1 similar issue
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-3/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@write.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@valid-registers:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][15] ([i915#2527]) -> [PASS][16] +3 similar issues
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@valid-registers.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@valid-registers.html

  * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [SKIP][17] ([i915#1937]) -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-dg1-18/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-dg1-14/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a.html

  * igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][19] ([i915#4387]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12569/shard-rkl-2/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#103375]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
  [fdo#109274]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
  [fdo#109279]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
  [fdo#109280]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
  [fdo#109283]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109283
  [fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
  [fdo#109289]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109289
  [fdo#109295]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109295
  [fdo#109303]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
  [fdo#109309]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109309
  [fdo#109313]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109313
  [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
  [fdo#109506]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109506
  [fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
  [fdo#110189]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110189
  [fdo#110542]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110542
  [fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
  [fdo#111614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
  [fdo#111615]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111615
  [fdo#111644]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111644
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [fdo#112283]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112283
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#1397]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1397
  [i915#1839]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1839
  [i915#1845]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1845
  [i915#1849]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1849
  [i915#1902]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1902
  [i915#1937]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1937
  [i915#2017]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2017
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#2437]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2437
  [i915#2527]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2527
  [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575
  [i915#2587]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2587
  [i915#2672]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2672
  [i915#2705]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2705
  [i915#280]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/280
  [i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842
  [i915#2856]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2856
  [i915#2994]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2994
  [i915#315]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/315
  [i915#3281]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3281
  [i915#3282]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3282
  [i915#3297]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3297
  [i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
  [i915#3323]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3323
  [i915#3359]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3359
  [i915#3469]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3469
  [i915#3528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3528
  [i915#3546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3546
  [i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
  [i915#3558]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3558
  [i915#3637]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3637
  [i915#3689]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3689
  [i915#3742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3742
  [i915#3804]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3804
  [i915#3886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3886
  [i915#3966]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3966
  [i915#4070]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4070
  [i915#4078]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4078
  [i915#4098]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4098
  [i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
  [i915#426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/426
  [i915#4270]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4270
  [i915#4387]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4387
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#5176]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5176
  [i915#5235]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5235
  [i915#5286]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5286
  [i915#5289]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5289
  [i915#5325]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5325
  [i915#5327]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5327
  [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533
  [i915#5461]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5461
  [i915#5723]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5723
  [i915#5784]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5784
  [i915#6095]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6095
  [i915#6248]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6248
  [i915#6252]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6252
  [i915#6268]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6268
  [i915#6334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6334
  [i915#6433]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6433
  [i915#6524]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6524
  [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658
  [i915#6768]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6768
  [i915#6944]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6944
  [i915#6946]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6946
  [i915#6953]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6953
  [i915#7052]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7052
  [i915#7116]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7116
  [i915#7118]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7118
  [i915#7561]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7561
  [i915#7651]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7651
  [i915#7697]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7697
  [i915#7742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7742
  [i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_12569 -> Patchwork_112621v1
  * Piglit: piglit_4509 -> None

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_12569: 739b2ee4e76d9cd64e5fbe834b682e550e496cf4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7115: c162d70b00c6f4cf6a0ba1ca7a7e2ad8f7190646 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_112621v1: 739b2ee4e76d9cd64e5fbe834b682e550e496cf4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112621v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6749 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
  2023-01-10 19:42   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2023-01-11  9:16     ` Rodrigo Vivi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2023-01-11  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
  Cc: intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-hardening,
	Daniel Vetter, David Airlie

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:42:57PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:28:11PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:44:53AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards
> > > adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length
> > > arrays in a couple of structures (three, actually) with flex-array
> > > members.
> > > 
> > > This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > > routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
> > > enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2].
> > > 
> > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1]
> > > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2]
> > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > > index 3624abfd22d1..9d589c28f40f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/guc_capture_fwif.h
> > > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct guc_debug_capture_list_header {
> > >  
> > >  struct guc_debug_capture_list {
> > >  	struct guc_debug_capture_list_header header;
> > > -	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[0];
> > > +	struct guc_mmio_reg regs[];
> > >  } __packed;
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_header_t {
> > >  
> > >  struct guc_state_capture_t {
> > >  	struct guc_state_capture_header_t header;
> > > -	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[0];
> > > +	struct guc_mmio_reg mmio_entries[];
> > >  } __packed;
> > >  
> > >  enum guc_capture_group_types {
> > > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t {
> > >  /* this is the top level structure where an error-capture dump starts */
> > >  struct guc_state_capture_group_t {
> > >  	struct guc_state_capture_group_header_t grp_header;
> > > -	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[0];
> > > +	struct guc_state_capture_t capture_entries[];
> > 
> > Please notice we are currently using sizeof(struct ...).
> 
> Yep; I noticed that. :)
> 
> > Along with your proposed changes, shouldn't we also start using
> > the struct_size() which already take the flexible array into account?
> 
> Not necessarily. In recent times, we don't include the struct_size
> changes in the same patch as the flex-array transformation. That's
> usually a follow-up patch.

okay, if that's not a problem, let's go with this for now and wait
for the follow ups.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

(and pushing it right now. Thanks for the patch)

> 
> --
> Gustavo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-11  9:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-10 16:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm/i915/guc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members Gustavo A. R. Silva
2023-01-10 19:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-10 19:42   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2023-01-11  9:16     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-01-11  4:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox