Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>
Cc: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Simon Ser" <contact@emersion.fr>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Melissa Wen" <mwen@igalia.com>,
	"VMware Graphics Reviewers"
	<linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Zack Rusin" <zackr@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/framebuffer: Check for valid formats
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:48:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y788su0QVqdBz5bo@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109105807.18172-2-mcanal@igalia.com>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:58:04AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Currently, framebuffer_check() doesn't check if the pixel format is
> supported, which can lead to the acceptance of invalid pixel formats
> e.g. the acceptance of invalid modifiers. Therefore, add a check for
> valid formats on framebuffer_check(), so that the ADDFB2 IOCTL rejects
> calls with invalid formats.
> 
> Moreover, note that this check is only valid for atomic drivers,
> because, for non-atomic drivers, checking drm_any_plane_has_format() is
> not possible since the format list for the primary plane is fake, and
> we'd therefore reject valid formats.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  Documentation/gpu/todo.rst        | 9 ++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> index 1f8a5ebe188e..3a79c26c5cc7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> @@ -276,11 +276,10 @@ Various hold-ups:
>  - Need to switch to drm_fbdev_generic_setup(), otherwise a lot of the custom fb
>    setup code can't be deleted.
>  
> -- Many drivers wrap drm_gem_fb_create() only to check for valid formats. For
> -  atomic drivers we could check for valid formats by calling
> -  drm_plane_check_pixel_format() against all planes, and pass if any plane
> -  supports the format. For non-atomic that's not possible since like the format
> -  list for the primary plane is fake and we'd therefor reject valid formats.
> +- Need to switch to drm_gem_fb_create(), as now framebuffer_check() checks for
> +  valid formats for atomic drivers.
> +
> +- Add an addfb format validation for non-atomic drivers.
>  
>  - Many drivers subclass drm_framebuffer, we'd need a embedding compatible
>    version of the varios drm_gem_fb_create functions. Maybe called
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> index aff3746dedfb..605642bf3650 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,14 @@ static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Verify that the modifier is supported. */
> +	if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev) &&
> +	    !drm_any_plane_has_format(dev, r->pixel_format, r->modifier[0])) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Unsupported pixel format %p4cc / modifier 0x%llx\n",
> +			    &r->pixel_format, r->modifier[0]);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-09 10:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Check for valid framebuffer's format Maíra Canal
2023-01-09 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/framebuffer: Check for valid formats Maíra Canal
2023-01-11 22:48   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2023-01-09 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/amdgpu: Remove redundant framebuffer format check Maíra Canal
2023-01-12 12:17   ` Simon Ser
2023-01-09 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: " Maíra Canal
2023-01-12 12:18   ` Simon Ser
2023-01-12 12:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-01-12 14:07     ` Maíra Canal
2023-01-12 15:15       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-01-09 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/vmwgfx: " Maíra Canal
2023-01-12  2:52   ` Zack Rusin
2023-01-09 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/plane: Unexport drm_any_plane_has_format() Maíra Canal
2023-01-11 22:50   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y788su0QVqdBz5bo@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=contact@emersion.fr \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mwen@igalia.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=zackr@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox