From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:33:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyHmK0sc2r1G7x5i@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220914141553.16864-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 07:45:53PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> DG1 and DG2 has lmem, and cpu can access the lmem objects
> via mmap and i915 internal i915_gem_object_pin_map() for
> i915 own usages. Both of these methods has pre-requisite
> requirement to keep GFX PCI endpoint in D0 for a supported
> iomem transaction over PCI link. (Refer PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1)
>
> TODO:
> With respect to i915_gem_object_pin_map(), every caller
> has to grab a wakeref if gem object lies in lmem.
>
> Till we fix all issues related to runtime PM, we need
> to keep runtime PM disable on both DG1 and DG2.
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 77e7df21f539..f31d7f5399cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -931,6 +931,26 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg1_info = {
> BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),
> /* Wa_16011227922 */
> .__runtime.ppgtt_size = 47,
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME: Temporary hammer to disable rpm.
> + * As per PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1, all iomem read write request over a PCIe
> + * function will be unsupported in case PCIe endpoint function is in D3.
> + * But both DG1/DG2 has a hardware bug that violates the PCIe specs
> + * and supports the iomem read write transaction over PCIe bus despite
> + * endpoint is D3 state.
> + * Due to above H/W bug, we had never observed any issue with i915 runtime
> + * PM versus lmem access.
> + * But this issue gets discover when PCIe gfx endpoint's upstream
> + * bridge enters to D3, at this point any lmem read/write access will be
> + * returned as unsupported request. But again this issue is not observed
> + * on every platform because it has been observed on few host machines
> + * DG1/DG2 endpoint's upstream bridge does not binds with pcieport driver.
> + * which really disables the PCIe power savings and leaves the bridge to D0
> + * state.
> + * Let's disable i915 rpm till we fix all known issue with lmem access in D3.
> + */
> + .has_runtime_pm = 0,
> };
>
> static const struct intel_device_info adl_s_info = {
> @@ -1076,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
> XE_LPD_FEATURES,
> .__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
> + .has_runtime_pm = 0,
The FIXME msg can be smaller, but it also needs to be here.
With this in place fell free to use:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Since the proper solution might take a while let's protect from this case,
regardless of any other on going discussion about the force_probe protection.
> .require_force_probe = 1,
> };
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-14 14:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-14 14:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2022-09-14 14:43 ` Andi Shyti
2022-09-14 14:50 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 15:35 ` Andi Shyti
2022-09-14 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 16:05 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:09 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:34 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-09-14 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-15 6:47 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-15 7:19 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-15 14:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-14 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev3) Patchwork
2022-09-15 9:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-13 7:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyHmK0sc2r1G7x5i@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox