public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyHod22zbMjkh8iY@alfio.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyHmK0sc2r1G7x5i@intel.com>

Hi Anshuman,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:33:15AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 07:45:53PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > DG1 and DG2 has lmem, and cpu can access the lmem objects
> > via mmap and i915 internal i915_gem_object_pin_map() for
> > i915 own usages. Both of these methods has pre-requisite
> > requirement to keep GFX PCI endpoint in D0 for a supported
> > iomem transaction over PCI link. (Refer PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1)
> > 
> > TODO:
> > With respect to i915_gem_object_pin_map(), every caller
> > has to grab a wakeref if gem object lies in lmem.
> > 
> > Till we fix all issues related to runtime PM, we need
> > to keep runtime PM disable on both DG1 and DG2.
> > 
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > index 77e7df21f539..f31d7f5399cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -931,6 +931,26 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg1_info = {
> >  		BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),
> >  	/* Wa_16011227922 */
> >  	.__runtime.ppgtt_size = 47,
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 *  FIXME: Temporary hammer to disable rpm.
> > +	 *  As per PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1, all iomem read write request over a PCIe
> > +	 *  function will be unsupported in case PCIe endpoint function is in D3.
> > +	 *  But both DG1/DG2 has a hardware bug that violates the PCIe specs

/has/have/

> > +	 *  and supports the iomem read write transaction over PCIe bus despite

/supports/support/

> > +	 *  endpoint is D3 state.
> > +	 *  Due to above H/W bug, we had never observed any issue with i915 runtime
> > +	 *  PM versus lmem access.
> > +	 *  But this issue gets discover when PCIe gfx endpoint's upstream

/gets discover/becomes visible/

> > +	 *  bridge enters to D3, at this point any lmem read/write access will be
> > +	 *  returned as unsupported request. But again this issue is not observed
> > +	 *  on every platform because it has been observed on few host machines
> > +	 *  DG1/DG2 endpoint's upstream bridge does not binds with pcieport driver.

/binds/bind/

> > +	 *  which really disables the PCIe power savings and leaves the bridge to D0
> > +	 *  state.
> > +	 *  Let's disable i915 rpm till we fix all known issue with lmem access in D3.
> > +	 */
> > +	.has_runtime_pm = 0,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct intel_device_info adl_s_info = {
> > @@ -1076,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
> >  	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
> >  	.__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> >  			       BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
> > +	.has_runtime_pm = 0,
> 
> The FIXME msg can be smaller, but it also needs to be here.

I actually like the comment, is very clear and helps
understanding the issue :)

Thanks again for addressing the issue and with the hope to see
the proper fix soon:

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Andi

> With this in place fell free to use:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> 
> Since the proper solution might take a while let's protect from this case,
> regardless of any other on going discussion about the force_probe protection.
> 
> 
> >  	.require_force_probe = 1,
> >  };
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-14 14:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-14 14:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-09-14 14:43   ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2022-09-14 14:50     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 15:35       ` Andi Shyti
2022-09-14 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 16:05   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:09     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:34       ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-09-14 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-15  6:47   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-15  7:19     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-15 14:44   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-14 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev3) Patchwork
2022-09-15  9:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-13  7:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyHod22zbMjkh8iY@alfio.lan \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox