* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Do both crawl and squash when changing cdclk
@ 2022-09-27 17:56 Anusha Srivatsa
2022-09-27 18:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2022-09-27 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
For MTL, changing cdclk from between certain frequencies has
both squash and crawl. Use the current cdclk config and
the new(desired) cdclk config to construct a mid cdclk config.
Set the cdclk twice:
- Current cdclk -> mid cdclk
- mid cdclk -> desired cdclk
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index a12e86d92783..e7faded38e66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1689,37 +1689,70 @@ static u32 cdclk_squash_waveform(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return 0xffff;
}
-static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
- enum pipe pipe)
+static int cdclk_squash_divider(u16 waveform)
+{
+ return hweight16(waveform ?: 0xffff);
+}
+
+static bool cdclk_crawl_and_squash(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config,
+ struct intel_cdclk_config *mid_cdclk_config)
+{
+ u16 old_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, old_cdclk_config->cdclk);
+ u16 new_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, new_cdclk_config->cdclk);
+ u16 mid_waveform;
+ int size = 16;
+ int div = 2;
+
+ if (!HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(i915) || !has_cdclk_squasher(i915))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Return if Squash only or Crawl only is the desired action */
+ if (old_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 || new_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 ||
+ old_cdclk_config->vco == new_cdclk_config->vco ||
+ old_waveform == new_waveform)
+ return false;
+
+ *mid_cdclk_config = *new_cdclk_config;
+
+ /* If moving to a higher cdclk(squash) the mid cdclk config
+ * should have the new (squash) waveform.
+ * If moving to a lower cdclk (crawl) the mid cdclk config
+ * should have the new vco.
+ */
+
+ if (cdclk_squash_divider(new_waveform) > cdclk_squash_divider(old_waveform)) {
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco = old_cdclk_config->vco;
+ mid_waveform = new_waveform;
+ } else {
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco = new_cdclk_config->vco;
+ mid_waveform = old_waveform;
+ }
+
+ mid_cdclk_config->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_squash_divider(mid_waveform) *
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco, size * div);
+
+ /* make sure the mid clock came out sane */
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk <
+ min(old_cdclk_config->cdclk, new_cdclk_config->cdclk));
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk >
+ i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq);
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk) !=
+ mid_waveform);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
+ enum pipe pipe)
{
int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
int vco = cdclk_config->vco;
u32 val;
u16 waveform;
int clock;
- int ret;
-
- /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
- ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
- SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
- SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
- SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
- else
- /*
- * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
- * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
- */
- ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
- HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- 0x80000000, 150, 2);
- if (ret) {
- drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
- "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
- ret, cdclk);
- return;
- }
if (HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(dev_priv) && dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0 && vco > 0) {
if (dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
@@ -1772,6 +1805,44 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(intel_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe));
+}
+
+static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
+ enum pipe pipe)
+{
+ struct intel_cdclk_config mid_cdclk_config;
+ int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
+ ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
+ SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
+ SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
+ SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
+ else
+ /*
+ * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
+ * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
+ */
+ ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
+ HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
+ 0x80000000, 150, 2);
+ if (ret) {
+ drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
+ ret, cdclk);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (cdclk_crawl_and_squash(dev_priv, &dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw,
+ cdclk_config, &mid_cdclk_config)) {
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &mid_cdclk_config, pipe);
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
+ } else {
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
+ }
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
ret = snb_pcode_write(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Do both crawl and squash when changing cdclk
2022-09-27 17:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Do both crawl and squash when changing cdclk Anusha Srivatsa
@ 2022-09-27 18:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2022-09-27 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:56:32AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> For MTL, changing cdclk from between certain frequencies has
> both squash and crawl. Use the current cdclk config and
> the new(desired) cdclk config to construct a mid cdclk config.
> Set the cdclk twice:
> - Current cdclk -> mid cdclk
> - mid cdclk -> desired cdclk
I might have said we don't need any logic in intel_modeset_calc_cdclk()
but I didn't mean it entirely literally :) I think we do need a bit
of logic there to avoid taking the "force full modeset" path.
So some kind of
can_crawl_and_squash() {
return has_crawl && has_squash && old_vco != 0 && new_vco != 0;
}
should be sufficient I think.
Hmm, but I guess that would mean the debug message won't be 100%
accurate. So your idea of using the same logic from
cdclk_crawl_and_squash() here too might be the best option after
all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index a12e86d92783..e7faded38e66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1689,37 +1689,70 @@ static u32 cdclk_squash_waveform(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return 0xffff;
> }
>
> -static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
> - enum pipe pipe)
> +static int cdclk_squash_divider(u16 waveform)
> +{
> + return hweight16(waveform ?: 0xffff);
> +}
> +
> +static bool cdclk_crawl_and_squash(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config,
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config,
> + struct intel_cdclk_config *mid_cdclk_config)
> +{
> + u16 old_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, old_cdclk_config->cdclk);
> + u16 new_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, new_cdclk_config->cdclk);
> + u16 mid_waveform;
> + int size = 16;
> + int div = 2;
> +
> + if (!HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(i915) || !has_cdclk_squasher(i915))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Return if Squash only or Crawl only is the desired action */
> + if (old_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 || new_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 ||
> + old_cdclk_config->vco == new_cdclk_config->vco ||
> + old_waveform == new_waveform)
> + return false;
> +
> + *mid_cdclk_config = *new_cdclk_config;
> +
> + /* If moving to a higher cdclk(squash) the mid cdclk config
> + * should have the new (squash) waveform.
> + * If moving to a lower cdclk (crawl) the mid cdclk config
> + * should have the new vco.
> + */
> +
> + if (cdclk_squash_divider(new_waveform) > cdclk_squash_divider(old_waveform)) {
> + mid_cdclk_config->vco = old_cdclk_config->vco;
> + mid_waveform = new_waveform;
> + } else {
> + mid_cdclk_config->vco = new_cdclk_config->vco;
> + mid_waveform = old_waveform;
> + }
> +
> + mid_cdclk_config->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_squash_divider(mid_waveform) *
> + mid_cdclk_config->vco, size * div);
> +
> + /* make sure the mid clock came out sane */
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk <
> + min(old_cdclk_config->cdclk, new_cdclk_config->cdclk));
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk >
> + i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq);
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk) !=
> + mid_waveform);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
> + enum pipe pipe)
> {
> int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
> int vco = cdclk_config->vco;
> u32 val;
> u16 waveform;
> int clock;
> - int ret;
> -
> - /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> - ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> - SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
> - SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> - SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> - else
> - /*
> - * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
> - * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
> - */
> - ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
> - HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> - 0x80000000, 150, 2);
> - if (ret) {
> - drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> - ret, cdclk);
> - return;
> - }
>
> if (HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(dev_priv) && dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0 && vco > 0) {
> if (dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> @@ -1772,6 +1805,44 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
> intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(intel_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe));
> +}
> +
> +static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
> + enum pipe pipe)
> +{
> + struct intel_cdclk_config mid_cdclk_config;
> + int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> + SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
> + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> + SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> + else
> + /*
> + * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
> + * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
> + */
> + ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
> + HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> + 0x80000000, 150, 2);
> + if (ret) {
> + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> + ret, cdclk);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (cdclk_crawl_and_squash(dev_priv, &dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw,
> + cdclk_config, &mid_cdclk_config)) {
> + _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &mid_cdclk_config, pipe);
> + _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
> + } else {
> + _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
> + }
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> ret = snb_pcode_write(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> --
> 2.25.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Do both crawl and squash when changing cdclk
@ 2022-09-27 22:50 Anusha Srivatsa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2022-09-27 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
For MTL, changing cdclk from between certain frequencies has
both squash and crawl. Use the current cdclk config and
the new(desired) cdclk config to construtc a mid cdclk config.
Set the cdclk twice:
- Current cdclk -> mid cdclk
- mid cdclk -> desired cdclk
v2: Add check in intel_modeset_calc_cdclk() to avoid cdclk
change via modeset for platforms that support squash_crawl sequences(Ville)
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index a12e86d92783..f7bc1013b149 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1689,37 +1689,68 @@ static u32 cdclk_squash_waveform(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return 0xffff;
}
-static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
- enum pipe pipe)
+static int cdclk_squash_divider(u16 waveform)
+{
+ return hweight16(waveform ?: 0xffff);
+}
+
+static bool cdclk_crawl_and_squash(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_cdclk_config,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_cdclk_config,
+ struct intel_cdclk_config *mid_cdclk_config)
+{
+ u16 old_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, old_cdclk_config->cdclk);
+ u16 new_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, new_cdclk_config->cdclk);
+ u16 mid_waveform;
+ int size = 16;
+ int div = 2;
+
+ /* Return if Squash only or Crawl only is the desired action */
+ if (old_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 || new_cdclk_config->vco <= 0 ||
+ old_cdclk_config->vco == new_cdclk_config->vco ||
+ old_waveform == new_waveform)
+ return false;
+
+ *mid_cdclk_config = *new_cdclk_config;
+
+ /* If moving to a higher cdclk(squash) the mid cdclk config
+ * should have the new (squash) waveform.
+ * If moving to a lower cdclk (crawl) the mid cdclk config
+ * should have the new vco.
+ */
+
+ if (cdclk_squash_divider(new_waveform) > cdclk_squash_divider(old_waveform)) {
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco = old_cdclk_config->vco;
+ mid_waveform = new_waveform;
+ } else {
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco = new_cdclk_config->vco;
+ mid_waveform = old_waveform;
+ }
+
+ mid_cdclk_config->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_squash_divider(mid_waveform) *
+ mid_cdclk_config->vco, size * div);
+
+ /* make sure the mid clock came out sane */
+
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk <
+ min(old_cdclk_config->cdclk, new_cdclk_config->cdclk));
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk >
+ i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq);
+ drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, mid_cdclk_config->cdclk) !=
+ mid_waveform);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
+ enum pipe pipe)
{
int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
int vco = cdclk_config->vco;
u32 val;
u16 waveform;
int clock;
- int ret;
-
- /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
- ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
- SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
- SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
- SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
- else
- /*
- * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
- * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
- */
- ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
- HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
- 0x80000000, 150, 2);
- if (ret) {
- drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
- "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
- ret, cdclk);
- return;
- }
if (HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(dev_priv) && dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0 && vco > 0) {
if (dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
@@ -1772,6 +1803,44 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE)
intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(intel_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe));
+}
+
+static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
+ enum pipe pipe)
+{
+ struct intel_cdclk_config mid_cdclk_config;
+ int cdclk = cdclk_config->cdclk;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Inform power controller of upcoming frequency change. */
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
+ ret = skl_pcode_request(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
+ SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE,
+ SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
+ SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
+ else
+ /*
+ * BSpec requires us to wait up to 150usec, but that leads to
+ * timeouts; the 2ms used here is based on experiment.
+ */
+ ret = snb_pcode_write_timeout(&dev_priv->uncore,
+ HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
+ 0x80000000, 150, 2);
+ if (ret) {
+ drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
+ ret, cdclk);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (cdclk_crawl_and_squash(dev_priv, &dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw,
+ cdclk_config, &mid_cdclk_config)) {
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &mid_cdclk_config, pipe);
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
+ } else {
+ _bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk_config, pipe);
+ }
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
ret = snb_pcode_write(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
@@ -1944,6 +2013,20 @@ void intel_cdclk_uninit_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
skl_cdclk_uninit_hw(i915);
}
+static bool intel_cdclk_can_crawl_and_squash(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *a,
+ const struct intel_cdclk_config *b)
+{
+ u16 old_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, a->cdclk);
+ u16 new_waveform = cdclk_squash_waveform(i915, b->cdclk);
+
+ if (!HAS_CDCLK_CRAWL(i915) || !has_cdclk_squasher(i915))
+ return false;
+
+ return a->vco != b->vco &&
+ old_waveform == new_waveform;
+}
+
static bool intel_cdclk_can_crawl(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct intel_cdclk_config *a,
const struct intel_cdclk_config *b)
@@ -2750,9 +2833,14 @@ int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
pipe = INVALID_PIPE;
}
- if (intel_cdclk_can_squash(dev_priv,
- &old_cdclk_state->actual,
- &new_cdclk_state->actual)) {
+ if (intel_cdclk_can_crawl_and_squash(dev_priv,
+ &old_cdclk_state->actual,
+ &new_cdclk_state->actual)) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Can change cdclk via crawler and squasher\n");
+ } else if (intel_cdclk_can_squash(dev_priv,
+ &old_cdclk_state->actual,
+ &new_cdclk_state->actual)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"Can change cdclk via squasher\n");
} else if (intel_cdclk_can_crawl(dev_priv,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-27 22:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-27 17:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Do both crawl and squash when changing cdclk Anusha Srivatsa
2022-09-27 18:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-27 22:50 Anusha Srivatsa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox