From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:22:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6EXhDOE3Mx9ueCF@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6D5rl5bcI1v675e@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:15:26PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > The driver enabling DC6 is not an enough condition for DC6 being allowed
> > > > from the display side. Some display clock gating etc. configuration by
> > > > the driver could be blocking it. According to the HW team, DC5 being
> > > > entered while DC6 is enabled is a guarantee that DC6 is allowed from the
> > > > display side - i.e. the driver has configured everything correctly for
> > > > that.
> > >
> > > Fair enough. So IGT test case would check directly if DC5 counter is
> > > increasing and DC6 is allowed.
> > >
> > > Something as simple as this in the kernel code would tell that
> > > DC6 is enabled:
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > @@ -1294,6 +1294,10 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > > seq_printf(m, "DC5 -> DC6 count: %d\n",
> > > intel_de_read(display, dc6_reg));
> > >
> > > + seq_printf(m, "DC6 allowed: %s\n", str_yes_no((intel_de_read(display,
> > > + DC_STATE_EN)
> > > + & 0x3) == 2));
> > > +
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > $ cat i915_dmc_info
> > > [snip]
> > > DC3 -> DC5 count: 286
> > > DC5 -> DC6 count: 0
> > > DC6 allowed: yes
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > $ cat i915_dmc_info
> > > [snip]
> > > DC3 -> DC5 count: 292
> > > DC5 -> DC6 count: 0
> > > DC6 allowed: yes
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > The DC5 increment could've happened while DC6 was disabled by the driver.
>
> Yes, it could... in general the dc6 bit would be zero, but right, there's
> a possible race.
>
> But should we complicate things when we know that on the test case itself
> we are in full control of the modeset?! From the test perspective I believe
> this would be more than enough without complicating things.
Imo having a counter which works based on the condition that guarantees the
display to allow DC6, would help later in debugging.
> But well, if you really believe that we need to go further in the driver
> to cover that it is fine by me.
>
> But just to ensure that we are in the same page, could you please open
> up a bit more of your idea on when to increase the dc5 sw counters
> in a way that we would ensure that we don't have race and that we
> get the dc6 allowed counter correctly?
Something like the following:
1. Right after the driver sets DC6_EN, it stores the DC5 HW counter's
current value:
dc5_start = dc5_current
2. Right before the driver clears DC6_EN, it updates the DC6 allowed
counter:
dc6_allowed += dc5_current - dc5_start
dc5_start = dc5_current
3. When userspace reads the counters via debugfs the driver first
updates dc6_allowed the same way as 2. did if DC6_EN is set.
> Btw, while doing this experiment I noticed that the debugfs and test
> also doesn't call that residency anyway and it is just count. So
> perhaps with your idea we don't need to change the debugfs interface.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 8:56 [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-02-03 9:23 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-03 15:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 12:43 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 14:26 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 14:59 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 15:14 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 15:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:01 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:27 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:51 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 17:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 19:22 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-02-03 20:19 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 20:23 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-02-03 20:40 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 20:59 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-02-03 21:18 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-04 18:10 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-04 17:15 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 16:49 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 17:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2025-02-03 17:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 17:31 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-03 20:06 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-12 11:49 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [v2] " Almahallawy, Khaled
2025-02-21 17:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 17:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 18:35 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-21 18:44 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-12 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-12 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-12 14:51 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-12 21:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:23 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-04 8:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 11:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-04 12:16 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 12:22 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-10 15:04 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-10 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-03 21:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-03 21:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 21:42 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-09 9:28 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-12 14:43 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-12 15:08 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 18:14 ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2025-03-12 18:49 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 19:32 ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2025-03-12 20:06 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 16:48 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev5) Patchwork
2025-03-12 20:30 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-12 20:54 ` [PATCH v7] " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-13 10:51 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-12 21:17 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev6) Patchwork
2025-03-12 21:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev7) Patchwork
2025-03-14 14:56 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-14 15:24 ` Patchwork
2025-03-19 11:48 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-19 15:14 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6EXhDOE3Mx9ueCF@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mohammed.thasleem@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox