From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:39:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173858999403.77773.2784787564938835855@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6C5-qxVQTYB3LHc@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
Quoting Imre Deak (2025-02-03 09:43:38-03:00)
>On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 02:26:13PM +0530, Mohammed Thasleem wrote:
>> Starting from MTl we don't have a platform agnostic way to validate DC6 state
>> due to dc6 counter has been removed to validate DC state.
>> Adding dc6_entry_counter at display dirver to validate dc6 state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> index 554870d2494b..cc244617011f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> @@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ struct intel_display {
>> struct {
>> struct intel_dmc *dmc;
>> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>> + u32 dc6_entry_counter;
>> } dmc;
>>
>> struct {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> index f45a4f9ba23c..0eb178aa618d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> @@ -869,6 +869,8 @@ void skl_enable_dc6(struct intel_display *display)
>> intel_dmc_wl_enable(display, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
>>
>> gen9_set_dc_state(display, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
>> +
>> + display->dmc.dc6_entry_counter++;
>
>AFAIU the goal is to validate that the display HW can reach the DC6
>power state. There is no HW DC6 residency counter (and there wasn't such
>a counter earlier either), so an alternative way is required. According
>to the HW team the display driver has programmed everything correctly in
>order to allow the DC6 power state if the DC5 power state is reached
>(indicated by the HW DC5 residency counter incrementing) and DC6 is
>enabled by the driver.
Yep. That's what I learned as well when looking into this stuff a while
ago.
>
>Based on the above, we'd need a DC6 residency counter maintained by the
>driver which is incremented if the DC5 residency counter increments
>while DC6 is enabled. The dc6_entry_counter in this patch is not enough
>for this, since it doesn't take into account the DC5 residency. While
>user space could check both dc6_entry_counter and the DC5 residency,
>that check would be racy wrt. the driver enabling/disabling the DC6
>state asynchronously.
I'm not sure doing a driver-maintained dc6 entry counter would be
something worth implementing. Even if we have successfully entered DC5
and, in theory, DC6 would follow if enabled, this would be a synthetic
counter and it could be masking some hardware bug that could be
preventing DC6.
On the IGT side, we could just skip if we are on a platform that does
not support DC6 counters, at least while we do not have a reliable
alternative way of checking for DC6.
It would be good if we could detect that PG0 was in fact disabled, which
I believe is a stronger indication of DC6.
--
Gustavo Sousa
>
>I suppose the driver could take a snapshot of the DC5 residency counter
>right after it enables DC6 (dc5_residency_start) and increment the SW
>DC6 residency counter right before it disables DC6 or when user space
>reads the DC6 counter. So the driver would update the counter at these
>two points in the following way:
>dc6_residency += dc5_residency_current - dc5_residency_start
>
>The commit log would need a justification, something along the above
>lines.
>
>> }
>>
>> void bxt_enable_dc9(struct intel_display *display)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> index 221d3abda791..f51bd8e6011d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> @@ -1293,6 +1293,7 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>> if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(dc6_reg))
>> seq_printf(m, "DC5 -> DC6 count: %d\n",
>> intel_de_read(display, dc6_reg));
>> + seq_printf(m, "DC6 entry count: %d\n", display->dmc.dc6_entry_counter);
>>
>> seq_printf(m, "program base: 0x%08x\n",
>> intel_de_read(display, DMC_PROGRAM(dmc->dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].start_mmioaddr, 0)));
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 8:56 [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-02-03 9:23 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-03 15:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 12:43 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-02-03 14:26 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 14:59 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 15:14 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 15:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:01 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:27 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 16:51 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 17:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-03 19:22 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 20:19 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 20:23 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-02-03 20:40 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 20:59 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-02-03 21:18 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-04 18:10 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-04 17:15 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 16:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-02-03 16:49 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 17:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2025-02-03 17:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 17:31 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-03 20:06 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-12 11:49 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [v2] " Almahallawy, Khaled
2025-02-21 17:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 17:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 18:35 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-21 18:44 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-12 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-12 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-12 14:51 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-12 21:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-03 19:23 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-04 8:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 11:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-04 12:16 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-04 12:22 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-09 8:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-10 15:04 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-10 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-03 21:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-03 21:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 21:42 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-09 9:28 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-12 14:43 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-12 15:08 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 18:14 ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2025-03-12 18:49 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 19:32 ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2025-03-12 20:06 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-12 16:48 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev5) Patchwork
2025-03-12 20:30 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-12 20:54 ` [PATCH v7] " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-13 10:51 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-12 21:17 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev6) Patchwork
2025-03-12 21:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Add debugfs for dc6 counter (rev7) Patchwork
2025-03-14 14:56 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-14 15:24 ` Patchwork
2025-03-19 11:48 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-19 15:14 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173858999403.77773.2784787564938835855@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mohammed.thasleem@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox