From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Only set PCI d3cold_allowed when we are really allowing.
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:18:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMA8Ko8RYfpZP+qe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY5PR11MB621139820D8A2ED0CB2F49E59503A@CY5PR11MB6211.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 01:08:11AM -0400, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2023 12:30 AM
> > To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Only set PCI d3cold_allowed when we are
> > really allowing.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 03:39:35AM -0400, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 2:34 AM
> > > > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman
> > > > <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Only set PCI d3cold_allowed when we are
> > > > really allowing.
> > > >
> > > > First of all it was strange to see:
> > > > if (allowed) {
> > > > ...
> > > > } else {
> > > > D3COLD_ENABLE
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > But besides this misalignment, let's also use the pci d3cold_allowed
> > > > useful to us and know that we are not really allowing d3cold.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 3 +--
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c index 78df43c20cd2..0c4051f4f746
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > > > @@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ static int xe_pci_runtime_suspend(struct device
> > > > *dev)
> > > > pci_save_state(pdev);
> > > >
> > > > if (xe->d3cold.allowed) {
> > > > + d3cold_toggle(pdev, D3COLD_ENABLE);
> > > > pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > > > pci_ignore_hotplug(pdev);
> > > > pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3cold); @@ -823,8 +824,6
> > @@ static
> > > > int xe_pci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > return err;
> > > >
> > > > pci_set_master(pdev);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - d3cold_toggle(pdev, D3COLD_ENABLE);
> > > > }
> > > During s2idle , d3cold may get disabled if won't restore it's state in runtime
> > resume.
> >
> > I always forget about that case... please disregard this patch.
> I think , we can have this patch.
> I realized that system wide suspend/resume d3cold need some brainstorming.
> If device is already in runtime suspend state during system wide suspend, PM core may smartly skip device suspend/resume callback on Xe driver.
> This wasn't the case on I915 driver as it explicitly disables those smart optimization by
> dev_pm_set_driver_flags(kdev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE).
so, it looks that we do need this as well anyway.
1. because we might not be in the runtime-d3cold, but on the system suspend
we will lose power, hence the eviction/restore needs to happen.
2. because of the hda audio as documented in i915: "becaue the HDA driver
may require us to enable the audio power domain during system suspend."
then, on device suspend we enable the d3cold and disable again on
device resume.
> Thanks,
> Anshuman.
> Thanks,
> Anshuman Gupta.
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anshuman Gupta.
> > > >
> > > > return xe_pm_runtime_resume(xe);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.41.0
> > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 21:03 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Only set PCI d3cold_allowed when we are really allowing Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-20 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Move d3cold_allowed decision all together Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-21 7:42 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-20 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Fix the runtime_idle call and d3cold.allowed decision Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-21 6:00 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-21 19:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-20 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Only init runtime PM after all d3cold config is in place Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-21 7:27 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-20 21:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/xe: Only set PCI d3cold_allowed when we are really allowing Patchwork
2023-07-21 7:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] " Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-21 19:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-25 5:08 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-25 21:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMA8Ko8RYfpZP+qe@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox