Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/dp: Separate out functions for edp/DP for computing DSC bpp
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:08:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNDeyhJa568jt3WO@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728041150.2524032-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:41:44AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Refactor code to separate functions for eDP and DP for computing
> pipe_bpp/compressed bpp when DSC is involved.
> 
> This will help to optimize the link configuration for DP later.
> 
> v2: Fix checkpatch warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 6228cfc44055..c87c3836966c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1699,6 +1699,115 @@ bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int pipe_bpp)
>  	return pipe_bpp >= intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(i915) * 3;
>  }
>  
> +static
> +int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	int forced_bpp;
> +
> +	if (!intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	forced_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3;
> +
> +	if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, forced_bpp)) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Input DSC BPC forced to %d\n", intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
> +		return forced_bpp;
> +	}
> +
> +	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Cannot force DSC BPC:%d, due to DSC BPC limits\n",
> +		    intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					 struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> +					 struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> +					 struct link_config_limits *limits,
> +					 int timeslots)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	u16 output_bpp, dsc_max_compressed_bpp = 0;
> +	int forced_bpp, pipe_bpp;
> +
> +	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (forced_bpp) {
> +		pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
> +	} else {
> +		pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> +
> +		if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, pipe_bpp)) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> +				    "Computed BPC less than min supported by source for DSC\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * For now enable DSC for max link rate, max lane count.
> +	 * Optimize this later for the minimum possible link rate/lane count
> +	 * with DSC enabled for the requested mode.
> +	 */
> +	pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
> +	pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
> +	dsc_max_compressed_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_get_max_compressed_bpp(i915,
> +								     pipe_config->port_clock,
> +								     pipe_config->lane_count,
> +								     adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> +								     adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> +								     pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> +								     pipe_config->output_format,
> +								     pipe_bpp,
> +								     timeslots);
> +	if (!dsc_max_compressed_bpp) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Compressed BPP not supported\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	output_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
> +
> +	pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16, dsc_max_compressed_bpp, output_bpp);
> +
> +	pipe_config->pipe_bpp = pipe_bpp;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					  struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> +					  struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> +					  struct link_config_limits *limits)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	int pipe_bpp, forced_bpp;
> +
> +	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (forced_bpp) {
> +		pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
> +	} else {
> +		/* For eDP use max bpp that can be supported with DSC. */
> +		pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(intel_dp,
> +							conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> +		if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, pipe_bpp)) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> +				    "Computed BPC less than min supported by source for DSC\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
> +	pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
> +	pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp =
> +		min_t(u16, drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd) >> 4,
> +		      pipe_bpp);
> +
> +	pipe_config->pipe_bpp = pipe_bpp;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  				struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>  				struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> @@ -1721,44 +1830,28 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(intel_dp, pipe_config->output_format))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * compute pipe bpp is set to false for DP MST DSC case
> +	 * and compressed_bpp is calculated same time once
> +	 * vpci timeslots are allocated, because overall bpp
> +	 * calculation procedure is bit different for MST case.
> +	 */
>  	if (compute_pipe_bpp) {
> -		int pipe_bpp;
> -		int forced_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3;
> -
> -		if (forced_bpp && is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(dev_priv, forced_bpp)) {
> -			pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
> -			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Input DSC BPC forced to %d\n",
> -				    intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
> -		} else {
> -			drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, forced_bpp,
> -				 "Cannot force DSC BPC:%d, due to DSC BPC limits\n",
> -				 intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
> -
> -			pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(intel_dp,
> -								conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> -
> -			if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(dev_priv, pipe_bpp)) {
> -				drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> -					    "Computed BPC less than min supported by source for DSC\n");
> -				return -EINVAL;
> -			}
> +		if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +			ret = intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> +							     conn_state, limits);
> +		else
> +			ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> +							    conn_state, limits, timeslots);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> +				    "No Valid pipe bpp for given mode ret = %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
>  		}
> -
> -		pipe_config->pipe_bpp = pipe_bpp;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * For now enable DSC for max link rate, max lane count.
> -	 * Optimize this later for the minimum possible link rate/lane count
> -	 * with DSC enabled for the requested mode.
> -	 */
> -	pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
> -	pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
> -
> +	/* Calculate Slice count */
>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> -		pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp =
> -			min_t(u16, drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd) >> 4,
> -			      pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
>  		pipe_config->dsc.slice_count =
>  			drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
>  							true);
> @@ -1768,26 +1861,8 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		u16 dsc_max_compressed_bpp = 0;
>  		u8 dsc_dp_slice_count;
>  
> -		if (compute_pipe_bpp) {
> -			dsc_max_compressed_bpp =
> -				intel_dp_dsc_get_max_compressed_bpp(dev_priv,
> -								    pipe_config->port_clock,
> -								    pipe_config->lane_count,
> -								    adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> -								    adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> -								    pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> -								    pipe_config->output_format,
> -								    pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
> -								    timeslots);
> -			if (!dsc_max_compressed_bpp) {
> -				drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> -					    "Compressed BPP not supported\n");
> -				return -EINVAL;
> -			}
> -		}
>  		dsc_dp_slice_count =
>  			intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
>  						     adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> @@ -1799,20 +1874,6 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * compute pipe bpp is set to false for DP MST DSC case
> -		 * and compressed_bpp is calculated same time once
> -		 * vpci timeslots are allocated, because overall bpp
> -		 * calculation procedure is bit different for MST case.
> -		 */
> -		if (compute_pipe_bpp) {
> -			u16 output_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format,
> -							     pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> -
> -			pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16,
> -								dsc_max_compressed_bpp,
> -								output_bpp);
> -		}
>  		pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
>  	}
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28  4:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/20] DSC misc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915/dp: Consider output_format while computing dsc bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915/dp: Move compressed bpp check with 420 format inside the helper Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use output_format to get the final link bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915/dp: Use consistent name for link bpp and compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915/dp: Update Bigjoiner interface bits for computing " Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915/intel_cdclk: Add vdsc with bigjoiner constraints on min_cdlck Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915/dp: Remove extra logs for printing DSC info Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/20] drm/display/dp: Fix the DP DSC Receiver cap size Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-02 11:43   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Avoid forcing DSC BPC for MST case Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-02 11:47   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915/dp: Add functions to get min/max src input bpc with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-02 12:05   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-08-04  4:12     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-08-07 12:30       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-08-08 10:08   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915/dp: Check min bpc DSC limits for dsc_force_bpc also Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:33   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915/dp: Avoid left shift of DSC output bpp by 4 Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915/dp: Rename helper to get DSC max pipe_bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:06   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/dp: Separate out functions for edp/DP for computing DSC bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:08   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915/dp: Add DSC BPC/BPP constraints while selecting pipe bpp with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:23   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915/dp: Separate out function to get compressed bpp with joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:35   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915/dp: Get optimal link config to have best compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915: Query compressed bpp properly using correct DPCD and DP Spec info Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915/dp: Check src/sink compressed bpp limit for edp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:27   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915/dp: Check if force_dsc_output_format is possible Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-07 12:25   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-28  4:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for DSC misc fixes (rev5) Patchwork
2023-07-28  5:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-28 12:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-08-08 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for DSC misc fixes (rev6) Patchwork
2023-08-08 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-08-08 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-08 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-10 13:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/20] DSC misc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2023-08-10 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/dp: Separate out functions for edp/DP for computing DSC bpp Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNDeyhJa568jt3WO@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox