From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Govindapillai, Vinod" <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane tiling checks per-platform
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:55:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRppTZd-qeCZuMYS@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e928b839ff9ebb66e46215319f9ca4ec1983b7a5.camel@intel.com>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:00:44AM +0000, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 14:38 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Carve up tiling_is_valid() into per-platform variants to
> > make it easier to see what limits are actually being imposed.
> >
> > TODO: maybe go for vfuncs later
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > index 4c4626c84666..052f9d8b53d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > @@ -984,16 +984,21 @@ static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct
> > intel_plane_state *
> > return effective_w <= max_w && effective_h <= max_h;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +static bool i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +{
> > + const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> > +
> > + return fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_fbc_tiling_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > {
> > - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
> > const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> >
> > switch (fb->modifier) {
> > case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> > case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> > case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
> > - return DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9;
> > case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
> > case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> > return true;
> > @@ -1002,6 +1007,16 @@ static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static bool tiling_is_valid(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
> > +
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
> > + return skl_fbc_tiling_valid(plane_state);
> > + else
> > + return i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid(plane_state);
> I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED is not checked for i8xx_fbc_tiling_valid() comparing to the original code.
> Is that intentional?
Tile4 was introduced in dg2/mtl
>
> With that checked,
>
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > static void intel_fbc_update_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > struct intel_plane *plane)
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-14 11:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/fbc: Remove ancient 16k plane stride limit Ville Syrjala
2023-09-14 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane stride checks per-platform Ville Syrjala
2023-10-01 10:53 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-10-02 7:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-10-02 7:32 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-14 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane tiling " Ville Syrjala
2023-10-01 11:00 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-10-02 6:55 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-09-14 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane rotation " Ville Syrjala
2023-10-01 11:03 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-14 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/fbc: Split plane pixel format " Ville Syrjala
2023-10-01 11:08 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-14 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/fbc: Remove ancient 16k plane stride limit Patchwork
2023-09-15 5:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] " Sharma, Swati2
2023-09-15 16:48 ` Matt Roper
2023-09-15 16:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-29 13:08 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2023-09-29 16:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/fbc: Remove ancient 16k plane stride limit (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-29 23:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRppTZd-qeCZuMYS@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox