From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Extract mchbar_reg()
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:07:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUievhTqfoI-ApJL@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bkcc2sez.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:31:16PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Stop repeating the same logic to determine the correct
> > config space register for MCHBAR.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_gmch.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_gmch.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_gmch.c
> > index f32e9f78770a..40874ebfb64c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_gmch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_gmch.c
> > @@ -33,18 +33,22 @@ int intel_gmch_bridge_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > i915->gmch.pdev);
> > }
> >
> > +static int mchbar_reg(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > +{
> > + return GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4 ? MCHBAR_I965 : MCHBAR_I915;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Allocate space for the MCH regs if needed, return nonzero on error */
> > static int
> > intel_alloc_mchbar_resource(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > {
> > - int reg = GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4 ? MCHBAR_I965 : MCHBAR_I915;
> > u32 temp_lo, temp_hi = 0;
> > u64 mchbar_addr;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4)
> > - pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, reg + 4, &temp_hi);
> > - pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, reg, &temp_lo);
> > + pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915) + 4, &temp_hi);
>
> How about having mchbar_hi_reg() and mchbar_lo_reg(), and drop the magic
> + 4 here and there?
>
> Either way,
I left it as is for now. There's also that magic |1
in there that would deserve a symbolic name. Someone
bored enough could perhaps tackle both issues together.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Thanks. Series pushed.
>
>
> > + pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915), &temp_lo);
> > mchbar_addr = ((u64)temp_hi << 32) | temp_lo;
> >
> > /* If ACPI doesn't have it, assume we need to allocate it ourselves */
> > @@ -68,10 +72,10 @@ intel_alloc_mchbar_resource(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > }
> >
> > if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4)
> > - pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, reg + 4,
> > + pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915) + 4,
> > upper_32_bits(i915->gmch.mch_res.start));
> >
> > - pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, reg,
> > + pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915),
> > lower_32_bits(i915->gmch.mch_res.start));
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -79,7 +83,6 @@ intel_alloc_mchbar_resource(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > /* Setup MCHBAR if possible, return true if we should disable it again */
> > void intel_gmch_bar_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > {
> > - int mchbar_reg = GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4 ? MCHBAR_I965 : MCHBAR_I915;
> > u32 temp;
> > bool enabled;
> >
> > @@ -92,7 +95,7 @@ void intel_gmch_bar_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, DEVEN, &temp);
> > enabled = !!(temp & DEVEN_MCHBAR_EN);
> > } else {
> > - pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg, &temp);
> > + pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915), &temp);
> > enabled = temp & 1;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -110,15 +113,13 @@ void intel_gmch_bar_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, DEVEN,
> > temp | DEVEN_MCHBAR_EN);
> > } else {
> > - pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg, &temp);
> > - pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg, temp | 1);
> > + pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915), &temp);
> > + pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915), temp | 1);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > void intel_gmch_bar_teardown(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > {
> > - int mchbar_reg = GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 4 ? MCHBAR_I965 : MCHBAR_I915;
> > -
> > if (i915->gmch.mchbar_need_disable) {
> > if (IS_I915G(i915) || IS_I915GM(i915)) {
> > u32 deven_val;
> > @@ -131,10 +132,10 @@ void intel_gmch_bar_teardown(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > } else {
> > u32 mchbar_val;
> >
> > - pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg,
> > + pci_read_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915),
> > &mchbar_val);
> > mchbar_val &= ~1;
> > - pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg,
> > + pci_write_config_dword(i915->gmch.pdev, mchbar_reg(i915),
> > mchbar_val);
> > }
> > }
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-01 11:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Some register cleanups Ville Syrjala
2023-11-01 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Extract hsw_chicken_trans_reg() Ville Syrjala
2023-11-02 13:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-01 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Stop using a 'reg' variable Ville Syrjala
2023-11-02 13:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-01 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Extract mchbar_reg() Ville Syrjala
2023-11-02 13:31 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-06 8:07 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-11-01 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dsi: Remove dead GLK checks Ville Syrjala
2023-11-02 13:32 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-01 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/dsi: Extract port_ctrl_reg() Ville Syrjala
2023-11-02 13:32 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-01 14:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Some register cleanups Patchwork
2023-11-01 14:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-01 14:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-04 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Some register cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-04 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-04 17:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-04 17:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Some register cleanups (rev3) Patchwork
2023-11-04 17:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-04 18:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-04 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUievhTqfoI-ApJL@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox