Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
	"Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org"
	<Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Cc: "DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org" <DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/2] Don't use stolen memory or BAR mappings for ring buffers
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:18:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a202bf77-a5a4-b7cd-44a6-6ddfb3625e66@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03de3c68458fd5c44e9fe1d4bba4687ea49c4788.camel@intel.com>

On 2/17/2023 00:39, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 17:10 -0800, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>
>> Instruction from hardware arch is that stolen memory and BAR mappings
>> are unsafe for use as ring buffers. There can be issues with cache
>> aliasing due to the CPU access going to memory via the BAR. So, don't
>> do it.
> Tested these patches for GPU Hang I was debugging. Seem to fix that one
> as well:
>
> Tested-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Sweet! Out of interest, which platform was that? And how reproducible 
was it? It would be interesting to know if an IGT was actually regularly 
showing the issue and we had just been ignoring it!

John.

>
>> v2: Dont use BAR mappings either.
>> Make conditional on LLC so as not to change platforms that don't need
>> to change (Daniele).
>> Add 'Fixes' tags (Tvrtko).
>> v3: Fix dumb typo.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>
>>
>> John Harrison (2):
>>    drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC
>>    drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-17 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-16  1:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/2] Don't use stolen memory or BAR mappings for ring buffers John.C.Harrison
2023-02-16  1:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC John.C.Harrison
2023-02-17 15:41   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2023-02-16  1:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-17 15:50   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2023-02-16  2:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Don't use stolen memory or BAR mappings for ring buffers Patchwork
2023-02-16 19:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Don't use stolen memory or BAR mappings for ring buffers (rev2) Patchwork
2023-02-17  7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-02-17  8:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/2] Don't use stolen memory or BAR mappings for ring buffers Hogander, Jouni
2023-02-17 17:18   ` John Harrison [this message]
2023-02-20  6:50     ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-02-20  8:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a202bf77-a5a4-b7cd-44a6-6ddfb3625e66@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox