From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Mun, Gwan-gyeong" <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>,
"maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Rename DP_PSR_SELECTIVE_UPDATE to better mach eDP spec
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:52:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a63b7ab5a0d507d61eab5da7663b5e0bad72f3f4.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b250e029-2b10-baa6-5822-42df586c6477@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 12:25 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 22-04-2021 om 13:00 schreef Mun, Gwan-gyeong:
> > The changed name looks more accurate to the edp 1.4b spec.
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:02 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > DP_PSR_EN_CFG bit 5 aka "Selective Update Region Scan Line Capture
> > > Indication" in eDP spec has a ambiguous name, so renaming to better
> > > match specification.
> > >
> > > While at it, replacing bit shit by BIT() macro and adding the version
> > > some registers were added to eDP specification.
> > >
> > > Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > > index 1e85c2021f2f..d6f6a084a190 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > > @@ -687,14 +687,14 @@ struct drm_device;
> > > #define DP_DSC_ENABLE 0x160 /* DP 1.4 */
> > > # define DP_DECOMPRESSION_EN (1 << 0)
> > >
> > > -#define DP_PSR_EN_CFG 0x170 /* XXX 1.2? */
> > > -# define DP_PSR_ENABLE (1 << 0)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE (1 << 1)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION (1 << 2)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE (1 << 3)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_SELECTIVE_UPDATE (1 << 4)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS (1 << 5)
> > > -# define DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 (1 << 6) /* eDP 1.4a */
> > > +#define DP_PSR_EN_CFG 0x170 /* XXX 1.2? */
> > > +# define DP_PSR_ENABLE BIT(0)
> > > +# define DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE BIT(1)
> > > +# define DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION BIT(2)
> > > +# define DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE BIT(3)
> > > +# define DP_PSR_SU_REGION_SCANLINE_CAPTURE BIT(4) /* eDP 1.4a */
> > > +# define DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS BIT(5) /* eDP
> > > 1.4a */
> > > +# define DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 BIT(6) /* eDP 1.4a */
> > >
> > > #define DP_ADAPTER_CTRL 0x1a0
> > > # define DP_ADAPTER_CTRL_FORCE_LOAD_SENSE (1 << 0)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> This should probably go throuh drm-misc-next, I don't see the next patch depending on this?
The patch depending on this change will be sent right after this one is merged.
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-23 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 22:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Rename DP_PSR_SELECTIVE_UPDATE to better mach eDP spec José Roberto de Souza
2021-04-21 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/xelpd: Do not program EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE José Roberto de Souza
2021-04-22 11:01 ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2021-04-21 22:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm: Rename DP_PSR_SELECTIVE_UPDATE to better mach eDP spec Patchwork
2021-04-21 22:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-04-21 23:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-04-22 9:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-04-23 15:23 ` Souza, Jose
2021-04-22 11:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Mun, Gwan-gyeong
2021-04-23 10:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-04-23 14:52 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a63b7ab5a0d507d61eab5da7663b5e0bad72f3f4.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox