public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:30:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXPMYDnNdGeNcJJV@ideak-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121035330.2793386-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:23:27AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Add intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk() helper, that checks the
> required pixel rate against platform dotclock limit.
> With joined pipes the effective dotclock limit depends upon the number
> of joined pipes.
> 
> Call the helper from the mode_valid phase and from the compute_config
> phase where we need to check the limits for the given target clock for a
> given joiner candidate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     | 26 ++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 14 +++++------
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 2ead783129f4..ed81cf4adb9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1440,6 +1440,18 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +bool intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(struct intel_display *display,

intel_dp_dotclk_valid()?

> +				     int target_clock,
> +				     int num_joined_pipes)
> +{
> +	int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> +	int effective_dotclk_limit;
> +
> +	effective_dotclk_limit = max_dotclk * num_joined_pipes;
> +
> +	return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
> +}
> +
>  static enum drm_mode_status
>  intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		    const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> @@ -1495,7 +1507,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  					   link_bpp_x16, 0);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
>  
>  		status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> @@ -1569,9 +1580,9 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (target_clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    target_clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -2888,7 +2899,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		if (joiner == FORCED_JOINER) {
>  			if (!connector->force_joined_pipes)
> @@ -2930,9 +2940,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		if (ret)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index e5913fba0143..0c1cd843bd0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -233,5 +233,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			       bool assume_all_enabled);
>  int intel_dp_hdisplay_limit(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(struct intel_display *display,
> +				     int target_clock,
> +				     int num_joined_pipes);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 46208ee67905..7c957351467e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -742,9 +741,9 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		if (ret)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (adjusted_mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    adjusted_mode->clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1542,7 +1541,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
>  
>  		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> @@ -1593,9 +1591,9 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (*status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    mode->clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			*status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-23 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-21  3:53 [PATCH 00/14] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:25   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:28   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 10:54   ` Jani Nikula
2026-01-21 11:19     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-23 18:44       ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:11   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:16   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:23   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:30   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:48   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  5:59 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXPMYDnNdGeNcJJV@ideak-desk \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox