From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:48:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXPQe2SaD-mDvksb@ideak-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121035330.2793386-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:23:30AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> From: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
>
> Add upper limit check for pixel clock by platform. Limits don't apply
> when DSC is enabled.
>
> For the currently supported versions of HDMI, pixel clock is already
> limited to 600Mhz so nothing needs to be done there as of now.
>
> BSpec: 49199, 68912
>
> v2: Add this limit to the new helper
> intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(). (Ankit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 7491e00e3858..04021ad6b473 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -8001,6 +8001,18 @@ void intel_setup_outputs(struct intel_display *display)
> drm_helper_move_panel_connectors_to_head(display->drm);
> }
>
> +int intel_dotclock_limit(struct intel_display *display)
The name should reflect that it's the (stricter) non-DSC dotclock limit,
so maybe intel_max_uncompressed_dotclock()?
> +{
I guess display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq could be used as a base, reducing
it if needed.
> + if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 3002)
> + return 937500;
While the above WCL limit is indeed in bspec, I couldn't find the HSD
for it. Windows doesn't use this limit either. So could it be a
follow-up to add the limit for this platform, to reduce the number of
affacted platforms until it's clarified why Windows doesn't use it?
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30)
> + return 1350000;
This one for PTL matches bspec, there is an HSD for it and it is also
used by Windows.
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 13)
> + return 1200000;
> + else
> + return 1100000;
The above ICL-MTL limits are not used by Windows either and I couldn't
find the corresponding HSDs. So could adding these two be done
separately as a follow-up (even though they are listed by bspec)?
> +}
> +
> static int max_dotclock(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> int max_dotclock = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index f8e6e4e82722..0009c305f140 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -488,6 +488,7 @@ void intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
> int intel_dotclock_calculate(int link_freq, const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
> int intel_crtc_dotclock(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> +int intel_dotclock_limit(struct intel_display *display);
> enum intel_display_power_domain intel_port_to_power_domain(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> enum intel_display_power_domain
> intel_aux_power_domain(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index a6a1a803d860..bd8ba6db01db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1456,6 +1456,9 @@ bool intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(struct intel_display *display,
> target_clock,
> htotal,
> dsc_slice_count);
> + else
> + effective_dotclk_limit =
> + min(max_dotclk, intel_dotclock_limit(display)) * num_joined_pipes;
>
> return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 3:53 [PATCH 00/14] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:06 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:25 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:28 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 10:54 ` Jani Nikula
2026-01-21 11:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-23 18:44 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:06 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:11 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:16 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:23 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:30 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 3:53 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:48 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-21 5:59 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXPQe2SaD-mDvksb@ideak-desk \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox