public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:17:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXqLBWUUsDhrhJVp@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128140636.3527799-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:36:31PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Add intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk() helper, that checks the
      ^intel_dp_dotclk_valid()

> required pixel rate against platform dotclock limit.
> With joined pipes the effective dotclock limit depends upon the number
> of joined pipes.
> 
> Call the helper from the mode_valid phase and from the compute_config
> phase where we need to check the limits for the given target clock for a
> given joiner candidate.
> 
> v2: Rename the helper to intel_dp_dotclk_valid(). (Imre)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Rebased on moving the check from mst_stream_compute_config() to
mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes() and status/ret fixes
mentioned earlier:

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     | 23 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 14 ++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 9bbd37ebd2ea..655688c8e6ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1449,6 +1449,18 @@ bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
> +			   int target_clock,
> +			   int num_joined_pipes)
> +{
> +	int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> +	int effective_dotclk_limit;
> +
> +	effective_dotclk_limit = max_dotclk * num_joined_pipes;
> +
> +	return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
> +}
> +
>  static enum drm_mode_status
>  intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		    const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> @@ -1511,7 +1523,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  	 * over candidate pipe counts and evaluate each combination.
>  	 */
>  	for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>  
> @@ -1582,9 +1593,9 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (target_clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> +					  target_clock,
> +					  num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -2870,7 +2881,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
>  
> -	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > max_dotclk)
> +	if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> +				   adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> +				   num_joined_pipes))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index 6d409c1998c9..78fa8eaba4ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -228,5 +228,8 @@ int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display);
>  bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
>  		       int num_joined_pipes);
> +bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
> +			   int target_clock,
> +			   int num_joined_pipes);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 7a83af89ef03..f433a01dcfcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -702,7 +702,6 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
>  
>  	for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -732,9 +731,9 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		if (ret)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (adjusted_mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> +					  adjusted_mode->clock,
> +					  num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1532,7 +1531,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>  
> @@ -1580,9 +1578,9 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (*status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> +					  mode->clock,
> +					  num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			*status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-28 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-28 14:06 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 16:46   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29  5:21     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29  5:48       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29  9:24         ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 10:01           ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:03   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:07   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 21:21   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 22:11     ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:17   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-29  3:57   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:19   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:35   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 23:00   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:49   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL and pre PTL platforms Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:53   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 15:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-28 20:04 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXqLBWUUsDhrhJVp@ideak-desk.lan \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox