From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid()
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:19:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXqLae4A0ZeDXWiU@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128140636.3527799-13-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:36:32PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Make dsc_slice_count closer to the block where it is used and promote it
> from u8 to int. This aligns it with upcoming DSC bubble pixel-rate
> adjustments, where the slice count participates in wider arithmetic.
>
> Currently, for non-eDP (DP/DP_MST) cases the slice count is computed only
> inside intel_dp_dsc_mode_valid() and is not used by the caller. Once DSC
> bubble handling is added, dp_mode_valid() will need access to its own local
> slice count for non-eDP cases as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 655688c8e6ef..0acb3b64cf27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1473,7 +1473,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> int target_clock = mode->clock;
> int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
> u16 dsc_max_compressed_bpp = 0;
> - u8 dsc_slice_count = 0;
> enum drm_mode_status status;
> bool dsc = false;
> int num_joined_pipes;
> @@ -1523,6 +1522,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> * over candidate pipe counts and evaluate each combination.
> */
> for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> + int dsc_slice_count = 0;
>
> status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>
> @@ -1547,6 +1547,11 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector)) {
> int pipe_bpp;
>
> + dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
> + target_clock,
> + mode->hdisplay,
> + num_joined_pipes);
> +
> /*
> * TBD pass the connector BPC,
> * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
> @@ -1561,12 +1566,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> dsc_max_compressed_bpp =
> drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd) >> 4;
>
> - dsc_slice_count =
> - intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
> - target_clock,
> - mode->hdisplay,
> - num_joined_pipes);
> -
> dsc = dsc_max_compressed_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
> } else if (drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
> unsigned long bw_overhead_flags = 0;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 14:06 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 16:46 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 5:21 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29 5:48 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29 9:24 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 10:01 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:03 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:07 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 21:21 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:06 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 22:11 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:17 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 3:57 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:19 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:35 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 23:00 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:49 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL and pre PTL platforms Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:53 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 15:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-28 20:04 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXqLae4A0ZeDXWiU@ideak-desk.lan \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox