Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Restore the missing check for intel_dp_has_joiner
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 12:33:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYXDe0_RlCYif6jB@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260206044753.808631-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 10:17:53AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Commit ad121a62d566 ("drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid")
> replaced intel_dp_num_joined_pipes() with an explicit joiner candidate
> iteration. The previous code implicitly checked for DP joiner capability
> via intel_dp_has_joiner(), but this check was lost during the refactor.
> 
> Restore the missing intel_dp_has_joiner() check in intel_dp_can_join() so
> that DP specific joiner conditions are taken into account.
> 
> v2: Derive intel_dp from intel_attached_dp(). (Imre)
> 
> Fixes: ad121a62d566 ("drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid")
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 4f5b89f80e55..7da4310b399e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1397,9 +1397,14 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
>  }
>  
>  static
> -bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
> +bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		       int num_joined_pipes)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (num_joined_pipes > 1 && !intel_dp_has_joiner(intel_dp))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	switch (num_joined_pipes) {
>  	case 1:
>  		return true;
> @@ -7218,8 +7223,9 @@ bool intel_dp_joiner_candidate_valid(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  				     int num_joined_pipes)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector);
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  
> -	if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
> +	if (!intel_dp_can_join(intel_dp, num_joined_pipes))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-06 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05  8:36 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05  8:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Make intel_dp_can_join() static Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05  9:44   ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05  8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Restore the missing check for intel_dp_has_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-05  9:41   ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05 12:37     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-05 12:53       ` Imre Deak
2026-02-05 14:20         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-06  4:47   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-06 10:33     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-02-05 12:30 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix Patchwork
2026-02-06  4:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-06  6:06 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Joiner cleanups and fix (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-07  4:20 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-09  5:47 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYXDe0_RlCYif6jB@ideak-desk.lan \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox