From: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com, michel@daenzer.net,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com,
daniel.vetter@intel.com, harry.wentland@amd.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 6/8] drm/i915: WA for platforms with double buffered adress update enable bit
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:24:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5b317aa-5197-4292-a545-8f69d9552c14@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915141909.GM6112@intel.com>
On 9/15/2020 7:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26:31AM +0530, Karthik B S wrote:
>> In Gen 9 and Gen 10 platforms, async address update enable bit is
>> double buffered. Due to this, during the transition from async flip
>> to sync flip we have to wait until this bit is updated before continuing
>> with the normal commit for sync flip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index a0c17d94daf3..b7e24dff0772 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -15360,6 +15360,42 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(crtc);
>> }
>>
>> +static void skl_toggle_async_sync(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> skl_disable_async_flip_wa() maybe?
>
Thanks for the review.
I'll change the name.
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>> + struct intel_plane *plane;
>> + struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state;
>> + u32 update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
>> + u32 plane_ctl, surf_addr;
>> + enum plane_id plane_id;
>> + unsigned long irqflags;
>> + enum pipe pipe;
>
> Most of these things are only needed within the loop, so that's where
> the declarations should be.
>
Sure, I'll move it inside the loop.
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
>> + if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
>> + !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + plane_id = plane->id;
>> + pipe = plane->pipe;
>> +
>
> I'd take the lock here so the rmw is fully protected.
>
Sure, I'll move it here.
>> + plane_ctl = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id));
>> + surf_addr = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id));
>> +
>> + plane_ctl &= ~PLANE_CTL_ASYNC_FLIP;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>> + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), plane_ctl);
>> + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), surf_addr);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + intel_wait_for_vblank(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> {
>> @@ -15387,6 +15423,14 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> else
>> intel_fbc_enable(state, crtc);
>>
>> + /* WA for older platforms where async address update enable bit
>
> s/older//
>
Noted.
>> + * is double buffered.
>
> "is double buffered and only latched at start of vblank" or
> something. Otherwise one is left wondering what the fuss is about.
>
Sure, I'll update this.
>> + */
>
> Multiline comment format should be
> /*
> * blah
> * blah
> */
>
I'll fix this.
>> + if (old_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip &&
>> + !new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip &&
>> + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 10 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>
> IS_GEN_RANGE(9, 10) or whatever it's called.
>
Sure, I'll update this.
> I guess we might want to put this call into intel_pre_plane_update()
> since that's where all kinds of similar wait_for_vblank w/as live.
>
Sure, I'll move this to intel_pre_plane_update()
Thanks,
Karthik.B.S
>> + skl_toggle_async_sync(state, crtc, new_crtc_state);
>> +
>> /* Perform vblank evasion around commit operation */
>> intel_pipe_update_start(new_crtc_state);
>>
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 5:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/8] Asynchronous flip implementation for i915 Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 1/8] drm/i915: Add enable/disable flip done and flip done handler Karthik B S
2020-09-15 13:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:36 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 2/8] drm/i915: Add support for async flips in I915 Karthik B S
2020-09-15 13:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:38 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 3/8] drm/i915: Add checks specific to async flips Karthik B S
2020-09-15 14:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:44 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 4/8] drm/i915: Do not call drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event in " Karthik B S
2020-09-15 14:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:46 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 5/8] drm/i915: Add dedicated plane hook for async flip case Karthik B S
2020-09-15 14:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:48 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-15 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 13:00 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-16 15:52 ` Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 6/8] drm/i915: WA for platforms with double buffered adress update enable bit Karthik B S
2020-09-15 14:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-16 12:54 ` Karthik B S [this message]
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 7/8] Documentation/gpu: Add asynchronous flip documentation for i915 Karthik B S
2020-09-14 5:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 8/8] drm/i915: Enable async flips in i915 Karthik B S
2020-09-14 11:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Asynchronous flip implementation for i915 (rev8) Patchwork
2020-09-14 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-09-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-09-14 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5b317aa-5197-4292-a545-8f69d9552c14@intel.com \
--to=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox