From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: forcewake struct mutex locking fixes
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7da2f$r698u3@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303343599-18509-4-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:53:17 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Just to annoy you, this needs to be split up into the various categories
of fixes. Because...
> static void ironlake_crtc_dpms(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int mode)
> @@ -3067,9 +3074,12 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> intel_disable_pll(dev_priv, pipe);
>
> intel_crtc->active = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> intel_update_fbc(dev);
> intel_update_watermarks(dev);
> intel_clear_scanline_wait(dev);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> }
This is overly correct. You can put a comment here to say that we will
never attempt to use FORCEWAKE here and that these registers are protected
by the mode_config lock. Except for intel_clear_scanline_wait, but that
itself is is longing to be killed now. If we haven't fixed the underlying
bug that we were working around by now, we have been too lax.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 23:53 forcewake v5 Ben Widawsky
2011-04-20 23:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: proper use of forcewake Ben Widawsky
2011-04-25 18:22 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-20 23:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: reference counted forcewake Ben Widawsky
2011-04-25 18:23 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-20 23:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: forcewake struct mutex locking fixes Ben Widawsky
2011-04-21 6:18 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2011-04-22 16:20 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-22 16:41 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-22 17:00 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-25 18:24 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-20 23:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: move gen6 rps handling to workqueue Ben Widawsky
2011-04-21 6:34 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-22 16:12 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-25 18:25 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-20 23:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: debugfs interface for forcewake reference count Ben Widawsky
2011-04-25 18:25 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-25 19:28 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-25 21:46 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-26 7:57 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-21 6:39 ` forcewake v5 Chris Wilson
2011-04-25 18:21 ` Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b7da2f$r698u3@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com' \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox