* [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
@ 2018-01-10 12:24 Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 12:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2018-01-10 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Intel-gfx
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
After recent code changes this part of the code now looks over-engineered
and can be simplified, together with the corresponding struct members.
Also correct the comment describing the unit of workaround bb size.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 57 +++++++++------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 9 ++----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index ff25f209d0a5..3ab1021d8518 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1260,10 +1260,10 @@ gen8_emit_flush_coherentl3_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch)
}
/*
- * Typically we only have one indirect_ctx and per_ctx batch buffer which are
- * initialized at the beginning and shared across all contexts but this field
- * helps us to have multiple batches at different offsets and select them based
- * on a criteria. At the moment this batch always start at the beginning of the page
+ * Typically we only have one indirect_ctx batch buffer which is initialized
+ * at the beginning and shared across all contexts but this field helps us
+ * to have multiple batches at different offsets and select them based on a
+ * criteria. At the moment this batch always start at the beginning of the page
* and at this point we don't have multiple wa_ctx batch buffers.
*
* The number of WA applied are not known at the beginning; we use this field
@@ -1406,12 +1406,10 @@ typedef u32 *(*wa_bb_func_t)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *batch);
static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
struct i915_ctx_workarounds *wa_ctx = &engine->wa_ctx;
- struct i915_wa_ctx_bb *wa_bb[2] = { &wa_ctx->indirect_ctx,
- &wa_ctx->per_ctx };
- wa_bb_func_t wa_bb_fn[2];
+ struct i915_wa_ctx_bb *wa_bb = &wa_ctx->indirect_ctx;
+ wa_bb_func_t wa_bb_fn;
struct page *page;
- void *batch, *batch_ptr;
- unsigned int i;
+ void *batch;
int ret;
if (WARN_ON(engine->id != RCS || !engine->scratch))
@@ -1421,12 +1419,10 @@ static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
case 10:
return 0;
case 9:
- wa_bb_fn[0] = gen9_init_indirectctx_bb;
- wa_bb_fn[1] = NULL;
+ wa_bb_fn = gen9_init_indirectctx_bb;
break;
case 8:
- wa_bb_fn[0] = gen8_init_indirectctx_bb;
- wa_bb_fn[1] = NULL;
+ wa_bb_fn = gen8_init_indirectctx_bb;
break;
default:
MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(engine->i915));
@@ -1440,31 +1436,16 @@ static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
}
page = i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page(wa_ctx->vma->obj, 0);
- batch = batch_ptr = kmap_atomic(page);
+ batch = kmap_atomic(page);
- /*
- * Emit the two workaround batch buffers, recording the offset from the
- * start of the workaround batch buffer object for each and their
- * respective sizes.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_bb_fn); i++) {
- wa_bb[i]->offset = batch_ptr - batch;
- if (WARN_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(wa_bb[i]->offset, CACHELINE_BYTES))) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
- }
- if (wa_bb_fn[i])
- batch_ptr = wa_bb_fn[i](engine, batch_ptr);
- wa_bb[i]->size = batch_ptr - (batch + wa_bb[i]->offset);
- }
-
- BUG_ON(batch_ptr - batch > CTX_WA_BB_OBJ_SIZE);
+ /* Emit the workaround batch buffer, recording its size. */
+ wa_bb->size = (void *)wa_bb_fn(engine, batch) - batch;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(wa_bb->size > CTX_WA_BB_OBJ_SIZE ||
+ !IS_ALIGNED(wa_bb->size, CACHELINE_BYTES));
kunmap_atomic(batch);
- if (ret)
- lrc_destroy_wa_ctx(engine);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static u8 gtiir[] = {
@@ -2184,7 +2165,7 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
u32 ggtt_offset = i915_ggtt_offset(wa_ctx->vma);
regs[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX + 1] =
- (ggtt_offset + wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.offset) |
+ ggtt_offset |
(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size / CACHELINE_BYTES);
regs[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET + 1] =
@@ -2192,12 +2173,6 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
}
CTX_REG(regs, CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR, RING_BB_PER_CTX_PTR(base), 0);
- if (wa_ctx->per_ctx.size) {
- u32 ggtt_offset = i915_ggtt_offset(wa_ctx->vma);
-
- regs[CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR + 1] =
- (ggtt_offset + wa_ctx->per_ctx.offset) | 0x01;
- }
}
regs[CTX_LRI_HEADER_1] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(9) | MI_LRI_FORCE_POSTED;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index c5ff203e42d6..6aa184f6ad2b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -142,17 +142,12 @@ struct drm_i915_reg_table;
* values are referred in terms of dwords
*
* struct i915_wa_ctx_bb:
- * offset: specifies batch starting position, also helpful in case
- * if we want to have multiple batches at different offsets based on
- * some criteria. It is not a requirement at the moment but provides
- * an option for future use.
- * size: size of the batch in DWORDS
+ * size: size of the batch in bytes
*/
struct i915_ctx_workarounds {
struct i915_wa_ctx_bb {
- u32 offset;
u32 size;
- } indirect_ctx, per_ctx;
+ } indirect_ctx;
struct i915_vma *vma;
};
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
2018-01-10 12:24 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2018-01-10 12:43 ` Patchwork
2018-01-10 12:50 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-10 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-10 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36271/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 36271v1 drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/36271/revisions/1/mbox/
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup basic:
incomplete -> PASS (fi-bsw-n3050) fdo#104571
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-kbl-r) fdo#104172 +1
fdo#104571 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104571
fdo#104172 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:422s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:427s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:372s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:485s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:281s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:487s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:488s
fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:470s
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:457s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:168 dwarn:10 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:179 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:108 time:273s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:514s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:393s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:404s
fi-ilk-650 total:288 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:409s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:460s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:415s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:468s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:497s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:452s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:503s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:575s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:435s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:508s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:531s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:494s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:496s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:288 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:430s
fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:532s
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:398s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:566s
fi-cnl-y2 total:288 pass:258 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:544s
fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:186 dwarn:1 dfail:4 fail:0 skip:97 time:377s
17fd16225c4df784ff06467c8bc528bee156a274 drm-tip: 2018y-01m-10d-09h-37m-51s UTC integration manifest
7d4cd8768e9b drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7641/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
2018-01-10 12:24 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 12:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2018-01-10 12:50 ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-10 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-01-10 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, Intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-10 12:24:49)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> After recent code changes this part of the code now looks over-engineered
> and can be simplified, together with the corresponding struct members.
I don't mind, but I was keeping it around just in case we ever need to
re-instantiate a per-bb wa batch.
If the consensus is we won't need one for the foreseeable future,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
2018-01-10 12:24 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 12:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-01-10 12:50 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-10 14:08 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-01-10 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36271/
State : success
== Summary ==
Warning: bzip CI_DRM_3618/shard-glkb6/results30.json.bz2 wasn't in correct JSON format
Test gem_softpin:
Subgroup noreloc-s4:
skip -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#103375 +1
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup flip-vs-modeset-vs-hang:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (shard-snb) fdo#103821
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-render:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#101623
fdo#103375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
fdo#103821 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103821
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
shard-hsw total:2641 pass:1500 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:10 skip:1128 time:8851s
shard-snb total:2713 pass:1309 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:11 skip:1391 time:7901s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2713 pass:1685 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:26 skip:1001 time:13574s
shard-kbl total:2637 pass:1624 dwarn:129 dfail:4 fail:24 skip:856 time:10351s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7641/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members
2018-01-10 12:50 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-01-10 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2018-01-10 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, Tvrtko Ursulin, Intel-gfx
On 10/01/2018 12:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-10 12:24:49)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> After recent code changes this part of the code now looks over-engineered
>> and can be simplified, together with the corresponding struct members.
>
> I don't mind, but I was keeping it around just in case we ever need to
> re-instantiate a per-bb wa batch.
>
> If the consensus is we won't need one for the foreseeable future,
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I expected something like that. I don't see anybody using it, but I also
don't mind if the scaffolding stays in. I'll let it hang out there, and
in case someone needs it it's there.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-10 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-10 12:24 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused workaround bb code and unused struct members Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 12:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-01-10 12:50 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-10 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-10 14:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox