Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix NPD in PMU during driver teardown

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>]

On 01/07/2022 01:11, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:00:28PM +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
>> In the driver teardown, we are unregistering the gt prior
>> to unregistering the PMU. This means there is a small window
>> of time in which the application can request metrics from the
>> PMU, some of which are calling into the uapi engines list,
>> while the engines are not available. In this case we can
>> see null pointer dereferences.
>>
>> Fix this ordering in both the driver load and unload sequences.
>>
>> Additionally add a check for engine presence to prevent this
>> NPD in the event this ordering is accidentally reversed. Print
>> a debug message indicating when they aren't available.
>>
>> v1: Actually address the driver load/unload ordering issue
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
>> ---
> 
> I thought this is likely happening because intel_gpu_top is running in 
> the background when i915 is unloaded. I tried a quick repro, I don't see 
> the unload succeed ("fatal module in use", not sure if this was a 
> partial unload), but when I try to kill intel_gpu_top, I get an NPD. 
> This is in the event disable path - i915_pmu_event_stop -> 
> i915_pmu_disable.

So i915 failed to unload (as expected - with perf events open we elevate 
the module ref count via i915_pmu_event_init -> drm_dev_get), then you 
quit intel_gpu_top and get NPD? On the engine lookup? With the 
re-ordered init/fini sequence as from this patch?

With elevated module count there shouldn't be any unloading happening so 
I am intrigued.

> It's likely that you are seeing a different path (unload) leading to the 
> same issue.
> 
> I think in i915_pmu_disable/disable should be aware of event->hw.state 
> and or pmu->closed states before accessing the event. Maybe like,
> 
> if (event->hw.state != PERF_HES_STOPPED && is_engine_event(event)) {
> 
> @Tvrtko, wondering if this case is tested by igt@perf_pmu@module-unload. 

A bit yes. From what Stuart wrote it seems the test would need to be 
extended to cover the case where PMU is getting opened while module 
unload is in progress.

But the NPD you saw is for the moment confusing so I don't know what is 
happening.

> I am not clear if we should use event->hw.state or pmu->closed here and 
> if/how they are related. IMO, for this issue, the engine check is good 
> enough too, so we don't really need the pmu state checks.  Thoughts?

Engine check at the moment feels like papering.

Indeed as you say I think the pmu->closed might be the solution. Perhaps 
the race is as mentioned above. PMU open happening in parallel to unload..

If the sequence of events userspace triggers is:

   i915_pmu_event_init
   i915_pmu_event_start
   i915_pmu_enable
   i915_pmu_event_read

I guess pmu->closed can get set halfway in i915_pmu_event_init. What 
would be the effect of that.. We'd try to get a module reference while 
in the process of unloading. Which is probably very bad.. So possibly a 
final check on pmu->close is needed there. Ho hum.. can it be made safe 
is the question.

It doesn't explain the NPD on Ctrl-C though.. intel_gpu_top keeps the 
evens open all the time. So I think more info needed, for me at least.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
> Regards,
> Umesh
> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 11 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c    | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> index deb8a8b76965..ee4dcb85d206 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
>> @@ -717,7 +717,6 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>     struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
>>
>>     i915_gem_driver_register(dev_priv);
>> -    i915_pmu_register(dev_priv);
>>
>>     intel_vgpu_register(dev_priv);
>>
>> @@ -731,11 +730,12 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>     i915_debugfs_register(dev_priv);
>>     i915_setup_sysfs(dev_priv);
>>
>> +    intel_gt_driver_register(to_gt(dev_priv));
>> +
>>     /* Depends on sysfs having been initialized */
>> +    i915_pmu_register(dev_priv);
>>     i915_perf_register(dev_priv);
>>
>> -    intel_gt_driver_register(to_gt(dev_priv));
>> -
>>     intel_display_driver_register(dev_priv);
>>
>>     intel_power_domains_enable(dev_priv);
>> @@ -762,11 +762,12 @@ static void i915_driver_unregister(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>>     intel_display_driver_unregister(dev_priv);
>>
>> -    intel_gt_driver_unregister(to_gt(dev_priv));
>> -
>>     i915_perf_unregister(dev_priv);
>> +    /* GT should be available until PMU is gone */
>>     i915_pmu_unregister(dev_priv);
>>
>> +    intel_gt_driver_unregister(to_gt(dev_priv));
>> +
>>     i915_teardown_sysfs(dev_priv);
>>     drm_dev_unplug(&dev_priv->drm);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> index 958b37123bf1..796a1d8e36f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> @@ -670,21 +670,28 @@ static void i915_pmu_enable(struct perf_event 
>> *event)
>>     if (is_engine_event(event)) {
>>         u8 sample = engine_event_sample(event);
>>         struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> -
>> -        engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915,
>> -                          engine_event_class(event),
>> -                          engine_event_instance(event));
>> -
>> -        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count) !=
>> -                 I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT);
>> -        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample) !=
>> -                 I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT);
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count));
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample));
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == ~0);
>> -
>> -        engine->pmu.enable |= BIT(sample);
>> -        engine->pmu.enable_count[sample]++;
>> +        u8 class = engine_event_class(event);
>> +        u8 instance = engine_event_instance(event);
>> +
>> +        engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915, class, instance);
>> +        if (engine) {
>> +            BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count) !=
>> +                     I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT);
>> +            BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample) !=
>> +                     I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT);
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(sample >=
>> +                   ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count));
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(sample >=
>> +                   ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample));
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == ~0);
>> +
>> +            engine->pmu.enable |= BIT(sample);
>> +            engine->pmu.enable_count[sample]++;
>> +        } else {
>> +            drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
>> +                "Invalid engine event: { class:%d, inst:%d }\n",
>> +                class, instance);
>> +        }
>>     }
>>
>>     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
>> @@ -714,21 +721,26 @@ static void i915_pmu_disable(struct perf_event 
>> *event)
>>     if (is_engine_event(event)) {
>>         u8 sample = engine_event_sample(event);
>>         struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> -
>> -        engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915,
>> -                          engine_event_class(event),
>> -                          engine_event_instance(event));
>> -
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count));
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample));
>> -        GEM_BUG_ON(engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == 0);
>> -
>> -        /*
>> -         * Decrement the reference count and clear the enabled
>> -         * bitmask when the last listener on an event goes away.
>> -         */
>> -        if (--engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == 0)
>> -            engine->pmu.enable &= ~BIT(sample);
>> +        u8 class = engine_event_class(event);
>> +        u8 instance = engine_event_instance(event);
>> +
>> +        engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915, class, instance);
>> +        if (engine) {
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.enable_count));
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine->pmu.sample));
>> +            GEM_BUG_ON(engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == 0);
>> +
>> +            /*
>> +             * Decrement the reference count and clear the enabled
>> +             * bitmask when the last listener on an event goes away.
>> +             */
>> +            if (--engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == 0)
>> +                engine->pmu.enable &= ~BIT(sample);
>> +        } else {
>> +            drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
>> +                "Invalid engine event: { class:%d, inst:%d }\n",
>> +                class, instance);
>> +        }
>>     }
>>
>>     GEM_BUG_ON(bit >= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu->enable_count));
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>