From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Michal Mrozek" <michal.mrozek@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/uapi: expose GTT alignment
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:26:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2f37a2e-3ff1-c689-613d-08306f8fa38f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166576630544.1044993.4210107539627625327@jljusten-skl.local>
On 14/10/2022 17:51, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2022-10-14 03:58:12, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> On 14/10/2022 08:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> Acked-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>>
>> Thanks. Can I take that as ack for merging the series from Mesa POV? I
>> think Lionel was going to test this, but I think keeps getting swamped
>> with other stuff. We kind of urgently need to land this series.
>
> Speaking from the uapi perspective, I would would say, yes, it looks
> seems good to merge. I looked over your igt patches, and they seem to
> test the uapi well. The uapi change is pretty simple, and the related
> documentation changes look good.
>
> No, we haven't gotten the chance to test the uapi implementation with
> Mesa, but I expect we will soon, once it's in drm-tip.
Pushed to drm-tip. Thanks.
>
> -Jordan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-04 11:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: enable PS64 support for DG2 Matthew Auld
2022-10-04 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/uapi: expose GTT alignment Matthew Auld
2022-10-04 14:08 ` Das, Nirmoy
2022-10-14 7:20 ` Jordan Justen
2022-10-14 10:58 ` Matthew Auld
2022-10-14 16:51 ` Jordan Justen
2022-10-14 17:26 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-10-04 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: enable PS64 support for DG2 Patchwork
2022-10-04 12:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-04 17:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-10-06 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: enable PS64 support for DG2 (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-06 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-10-06 10:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-07 1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d2f37a2e-3ff1-c689-613d-08306f8fa38f@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
--cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox