From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:57:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d385cd74ebdbc8d1843bc17eaae670ec5007d7de.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015072217.1710717-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 12:52 +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Add a function to set non-psr pipes in crtc_state based on psr
> features.
> This will help to move this part later where we re-evaluate psr
> features
> and update the non-psr pipes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 49 ++++++++++++++--------
> --
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 1d06011a97ce..e97dcfa7673c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1711,15 +1711,40 @@ static bool
> intel_psr_needs_wa_18037818876(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> !crtc_state->has_sel_update);
> }
>
> +static
> +void intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> + struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> + u8 active_pipes = 0;
> +
> + /* Wa_16025596647 */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) != 20 &&
> + !IS_DISPLAY_VERx100_STEP(display, 3000, STEP_A0,
> STEP_B0))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Not needed by Panel Replay */
> + if (crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
> + return;
> +
> + /* We ignore possible secondary PSR/Panel Replay capable eDP
> */
> + for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc)
> + active_pipes |= crtc->active ? BIT(crtc->pipe) : 0;
> +
> + active_pipes = intel_calc_active_pipes(state, active_pipes);
> +
> + crtc_state->active_non_psr_pipes = active_pipes &
> + ~BIT(to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe);
> +}
> +
> void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct drm_connector_state
> *conn_state)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state-
> >hw.adjusted_mode;
> - struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> - u8 active_pipes = 0;
>
> if (!psr_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "PSR disabled by flag\n");
> @@ -1768,23 +1793,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> "PSR disabled to workaround PSR FSM hang
> issue\n");
> }
>
> - /* Rest is for Wa_16025596647 */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(display) != 20 &&
> - !IS_DISPLAY_VERx100_STEP(display, 3000, STEP_A0,
> STEP_B0))
> - return;
> -
> - /* Not needed by Panel Replay */
> - if (crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
> - return;
> -
> - /* We ignore possible secondary PSR/Panel Replay capable eDP
> */
> - for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc)
> - active_pipes |= crtc->active ? BIT(crtc->pipe) : 0;
> -
> - active_pipes = intel_calc_active_pipes(state, active_pipes);
> -
> - crtc_state->active_non_psr_pipes = active_pipes &
> - ~BIT(to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe);
> + intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> }
>
> void intel_psr_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 7:22 [PATCH 00/10] Preparatory patches for guardband optimization Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/vrr: Use crtc_vsync_start/end for computing vrr.vsync_start/end Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/display: Move intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock early Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/vrr: s/intel_vrr_compute_config_late/intel_vrr_compute_guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/vblank: Add helper to get correct vblank length Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/psr: Consider SCL lines when validating vblank for wake latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:57 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Introduce dp/psr_compute_config_late() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 7:59 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/psr: Check if final vblank is sufficient for PSR features Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 8:23 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15 8:33 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15 9:14 ` Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 9:32 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/display: Add vblank_start adjustment logic for always-on VRR TG Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 13:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Prepare for vblank_delay for LRR Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-15 15:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-15 11:07 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Preparatory patches for guardband optimization (rev7) Patchwork
2025-10-15 17:12 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-16 5:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-16 5:54 [PATCH 00/10] Preparatory patches for guardband optimization Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16 5:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/psr: Introduce helper intel_psr_set_non_psr_pipes() Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d385cd74ebdbc8d1843bc17eaae670ec5007d7de.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox