Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp.dfp members with the new crtc_state dp_dfp members
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:43:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4d1590e-17df-4ed6-0eed-bdf237ddf7db@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yx+A+XHRzxJevOKr@intel.com>


On 9/13/2022 12:26 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:30:59AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> The decision to use DFP output format conversion capabilities should be
>> during compute_config phase.
>>
>> This patch uses the members of intel_dp->dfp to only store the
>> format conversion capabilities of the DP device and uses the crtc_state
>> dp_dfp members that are computed earlier, to program the
>> protocol-converter for colorspace/format conversion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 46 +++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index f3c2aeda0c1d..409bd9cdf450 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -805,6 +805,7 @@ intel_dp_output_format(struct intel_connector *connector,
>>   		       bool ycbcr_420_output)
>>   {
>>   	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>>   
>>   	if (!connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed || !ycbcr_420_output)
>>   		return INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
>> @@ -813,6 +814,10 @@ intel_dp_output_format(struct intel_connector *connector,
>>   	    intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420)
>>   		return INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
>>   
>> +	/* Prefer 4:2:0 passthrough over 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion */
>> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11 && intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr420_passthrough)
>> +		return INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420;
>> +
>>   	if (intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420)
>>   		return INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR444;
>>   	else
>> @@ -2698,8 +2703,8 @@ void intel_dp_configure_protocol_converter(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>   		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Failed to %s protocol converter HDMI mode\n",
>>   			    str_enable_disable(intel_dp->has_hdmi_sink));
>>   
>> -	tmp = crtc_state->output_format == INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR444 &&
>> -		intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 ? DP_CONVERSION_TO_YCBCR420_ENABLE : 0;
>> +	tmp = crtc_state->dp_dfp_config.ycbcr_444_to_420 ?
>> +		DP_CONVERSION_TO_YCBCR420_ENABLE : 0;
>>   
>>   	if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
>>   			       DP_PROTOCOL_CONVERTER_CONTROL_1, tmp) != 1)
>> @@ -2707,7 +2712,7 @@ void intel_dp_configure_protocol_converter(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>   			    "Failed to %s protocol converter YCbCr 4:2:0 conversion mode\n",
>>   			    str_enable_disable(intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420));
>>   
>> -	tmp = intel_dp->dfp.rgb_to_ycbcr ?
>> +	tmp = crtc_state->dp_dfp_config.rgb_to_ycbcr ?
>>   		DP_CONVERSION_BT709_RGB_YCBCR_ENABLE : 0;
>>   
>>   	if (drm_dp_pcon_convert_rgb_to_ycbcr(&intel_dp->aux, tmp) < 0)
>> @@ -4563,7 +4568,7 @@ intel_dp_update_420(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>>   	struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
>> -	bool is_branch, ycbcr_420_passthrough, ycbcr_444_to_420, rgb_to_ycbcr;
>> +	bool is_branch;
>>   
>>   	/* No YCbCr output support on gmch platforms */
>>   	if (HAS_GMCH(i915))
>> @@ -4577,38 +4582,21 @@ intel_dp_update_420(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>   		return;
>>   
>>   	is_branch = drm_dp_is_branch(intel_dp->dpcd);
>> -	ycbcr_420_passthrough =
>> +	intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr420_passthrough =
>>   		drm_dp_downstream_420_passthrough(intel_dp->dpcd,
>>   						  intel_dp->downstream_ports);
>>   	/* on-board LSPCON always assumed to support 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion */
>> -	ycbcr_444_to_420 =
>> +	intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 =
>>   		dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->lspcon.active ||
>>   		drm_dp_downstream_444_to_420_conversion(intel_dp->dpcd,
>>   							intel_dp->downstream_ports);
>> -	rgb_to_ycbcr = drm_dp_downstream_rgb_to_ycbcr_conversion(intel_dp->dpcd,
>> -								 intel_dp->downstream_ports,
>> -								 DP_DS_HDMI_BT709_RGB_YCBCR_CONV);
>> -
>> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11) {
>> -		/* Let PCON convert from RGB->YCbCr if possible */
>> -		if (is_branch && rgb_to_ycbcr && ycbcr_444_to_420) {
>> -			intel_dp->dfp.rgb_to_ycbcr = true;
>> -			intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 = true;
>> -			connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
>> -		} else {
>> -		/* Prefer 4:2:0 passthrough over 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion */
>> -			intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 =
>> -				ycbcr_444_to_420 && !ycbcr_420_passthrough;
>> +	intel_dp->dfp.rgb_to_ycbcr =
>> +		drm_dp_downstream_rgb_to_ycbcr_conversion(intel_dp->dpcd,
>> +							  intel_dp->downstream_ports,
>> +							  DP_DS_HDMI_BT709_RGB_YCBCR_CONV);
>>   
>> -			connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed =
>> -				!is_branch || ycbcr_444_to_420 || ycbcr_420_passthrough;
>> -		}
>> -	} else {
>> -		/* 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion is the only way */
>> -		intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420 = ycbcr_444_to_420;
>> -
>> -		connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed = ycbcr_444_to_420;
>> -	}
>> +	if (!is_branch || intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr420_passthrough || intel_dp->dfp.ycbcr_444_to_420)
>> +		connector->base.ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
> That part looks wrong for pre-icl now. They can't do the 4:2:0
> passthrough.


I have not put condition here, as here we are just storing the PCON 
conversion capability.

I have added the condition in intel_dp_output_format with ycbcr420passthrough for Display >= 11.

But yes for pre icl if dfp does not support 444_to_420, and since we cant do 4:2:0,
the connector->base.ycbcr420_allowed should perhaps be false.

I can add a condition for that.

Regards,
Ankit


>
>>   
>>   	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>>   		    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] RGB->YcbCr conversion? %s, YCbCr 4:2:0 allowed? %s, YCbCr 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion? %s\n",
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-13  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01  6:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] Handle BPC for HDMI2.1 PCON without DSC1.2 sink and other fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/dp: Reset frl trained flag before restarting FRL training Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/dp: Add RGB to YCBCR conversion case in is_dp_ycbcr420 helper Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove whitespace at the end of function Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915/display: Add new members to configure PCON color conversion Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-12 18:55   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-13  5:25     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-09-13  8:15       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-13 10:27         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Compute configuration for using PCON's color/format conversion Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/dp: Use crtc_state members in dp_is_ycbcr420 Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp.dfp members with the new crtc_state dp_dfp members Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-12 18:56   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-13  6:13     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2022-10-17 10:49       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-09-01  6:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Handle BPP where HDMI2.1 DFP doesn't support DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/dp: Fix FRL BW check for HDMI2.1 DFP Ankit Nautiyal
2022-09-01  6:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Handle BPC for HDMI2.1 PCON without DSC1.2 sink and other fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-01  6:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-01 20:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4d1590e-17df-4ed6-0eed-bdf237ddf7db@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox